^^■^^■HUBhIH^^I^^^^H
^^^^^^^^^^^^HHHBiH^^^^^I
^^^^^M^nm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^■IH
^^^^^^^^^^Ibh
^■1
^ggsmj;
•
'A
//
/
LIGHT, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE
MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited
LONDON • BOMBAY • CALCUTTA • MADRAS
MELBOURNE
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO
DALLAS • SAN FRANCISCO
THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd.
TORONTO
LIGHT
VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE
A SERIES OF LECTURES
DELIVERED AT THE ROYAL INSTITUTION OF
GREAT BRITAIN, AT CHRISTMAS, 1896
WITH ADDITIONAL LECTURES
BY
SILVANUS P: THOMPSON, ^N
D.Sc, F.R.S., M.R.I.
PRINCIPAL OF, AND PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS IN, THE CITY AND GUILDS
TECHNICAL COLLEGE, FINSBURY, LONDON
SECOND EDITION, ENLARGED
*«W COLLEGE UBHahY
I CJMrrNUT HHJL, MASS.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED
ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON
1928
ttOSTON COLL!»E tlBRAt^"
CHESTNUT HILL, MASS.
COPYRIGHT
First Edition i8g7
Second Edition, enlarged^ 1910, 1912, 1919, 1921, 1928
255899
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN
EY R. & R. CLARK, LIMITED, EDINBURGH
INTRODUCTION
Two things are expected of a lecturer who undertakes
a course of Christmas lectures at the Royal Institution.
In the first place his discourses must be illustrated to
the utmost extent by experiments. In the second,
however simple the language, in which scientific facts
and principles are described, every discourse must
sound at least some note of modernity, must reflect
some wave of recent progress in science.
So in undertaking a course of lectures in Optics in
the year 1896 the lecturer ventured to proceed on
certain lines which may, perhaps, seem strange to the
sedate student whose knowledge of optics has been
acquired on the narrower basis of the orthodox text-
book. The ideas developed in the first lecture arose
from the conviction that the time-honoured method of
teaching geometrical optics — a method in which the
wave-nature of light is steadily ignored — is funda-
VI LIGHT
mentally wrong. For the sake of students and teachers
of optics he has added to Lecture I. an Appendix, in
which the newer ideas are further developed. Other
Appendices have been added to the later Lectures,
with the aim of filling up some of the gaps left in the
subjects as treated in the lecture theatre.
Now that the electromagnetic nature of all light-
waves has been fully demonstrated, no apology is needed
for bringing into the fifth Lecture a few of the experi-
mental points upon which that demonstration rests.
That these fundamental points can be given without
any great complication of either thought or language
is in itself the strongest argument for making that
demonstration an essential feature at an early stage in
the teaching of the science.
Many of the ideas which must be grasped, for
example that of the polarisation of light, are popularly
supposed to be extremely difficult; whereas the difficulty
lies not in the ideas themselves so much as in the
language in which they are generally set forth. In an
experience lasting over a good many years, the author
has found that the main points in the phenomena of
polarisation are quite easily grasped by persons of
ordinary intelligence — even by children — provided they
are presented in a modern way devoid of pedantic
INTRODUCTION vil
terms, and illustrated by appropriate models. A
similar remark would equally apply to other parts of
optics, such as interference and diffraction, which are
barely alluded to in the present lectures. Many
branches are necessarily omitted altogether from so
brief a course : amongst them the entire subject of
spectrum analysis, the construction and theory of optical
instruments, and the greater part of the subject of
colour vision. No attempt was made to include these
topics, and no apology is needed for their omission.
Whatever value these discourses may possess must
depend upon the things they include, not upon those
which they do not.
At the request of the Publishers the author has added
a lecture on Radium which he has several times delivered
in different places in 1903- 1904, together with the lecture
On the Manufacture of Light which was given to a
popular audience at the Meeting of the British Associa-
tion in the city of York in 1906.
London, May 19 10.
CONTENTS
LECTURE I
LIGHT AND SHADOWS
How light-waves travel — Experiments with the ripple-tank — How
shadows are cast — How to make light -waves converge and
diverge — Measurement of brightness of lights — Reflexion of
light by mirrors — Formation of images — Regular and irregular
reflexion — Diffuse reflexion by paper and rough surfaces —
Multiple images — Refraction of light — Lenses — The eye as an
optical instrument — Some curious optical experiments — Inver-
sion of Images — The magic mirror of Japan — English magic
mirrors ......... Page I
Appendix — The general method of geometrical optics . . 55
LECTURE II
THE VISIBLE SPECTRUM AND THE EYE
Colour and wave-length — Rainbow tints — The spectrum of visible
colours — Spectrum made by prism — Spectrum made by grat-
ing—Composition of white light — Experiments on mixing
X LIGHT
colours — Analysis of colours — Blue and yellow mixed make
white, not green — Complementary tints — Contrast tints pro-
duced by fatigue of eye — Other effects of persistence of vision
— Zoetrope — Animatograph o . . . . Page 71
Appendix — Anomalous refraction and dispersion . . . 100
LECTURE III
POLARISATION OF LIGHT
Meaning of polarisation — How to polarise waves of light — Illus-
trative models — Polarisers made of glass, of calc-spar, and of
slices of tourmaline — How any polariser will cut off polarised
light — Properties of crystals — Use of polarised light to detect
false gems — Rubies, sapphires, and amethysts — Polarisation by
double-refraction — Curious coloured effects, in polarised light,
produced by colourless slices of thin crystals when placed
between polariser and analyser — Further study of comple-
mentary and supplementary tints — Exhibition of slides by
polarised light — Effects produced on glass by compression, and
by heating ...... o . . 105
Appendix — The elastic-solid theory of light .... 156
LECTURE IV
THE INVISIBLE SPECTRUM (ULTRA-VIOLET PART)
The spectrum stretches invisibly in both directions beyond the
visible part — Below the red end are the invisil)le longer waves
that will warm bodies instead of illuminating them — These are
called the calorific or infra-red waves. Beyond the violet end
of the visible spectrum are the invisible shorter waves that
/
CONTENTS xi
produce chemical efifects — These are called actinic or ultra-
violet waves — How to sift out the invisible ultra-violet light from
the visible light— How to make the invisible ultra-violet light
visible — Use of fluorescent screens — Reflexion, refraction, and
polarisation of the invisible ultra-violet light — Luminescence :
the temporary kind called Fluorescence, and the persistent
kind called Phosphorescence — How to make "luminous
paint " — Experiments with phosphorescent bodies — Other pro-
perties of invisible ultra-violet light — Its power to diselectrify
electrified bodies — Photographic action of visible and of in-
visible light — The photography of colours — Lippmann's dis>
covery of true colour-photography — The reproduction of the
colours of natural objects by trichroic photography — Ives's
photochromoscope . ...... Page i6o
Appendix — Table of wave-lengths and frequencies , . 190
LECTURE V
THE INVISIBLE SPECTRUM (iNFRA-RED PART)
How to sift out the invisible mfra-red light from the visible light —
Experiments on the absorption and transmission of invisible
infra-red light — It is cut off by transparent glass, but trans-
mitted by opaque ebonite — Use of radiometer — Use of thermo-
pile and bolometer — "Heat-indicating" paint — Experiments
on the reflexion, refraction, and polarisation of invisible infra-
red light — Discovery by Hertz of propagation of electric waves
— Plertzian waves are really gigantic waves of invisible light
— Experiments on the properties of Hertzian waves ; their
reflexion, refraction, and polarisation — Inference that all light-
waves, visible and invisible, are really electric waves of different
sizes . . . . . . . . . . 192
Appendix — The electromagnetic theory of light . , . 230
xii LIGHT
LECTURE VI
RONTGEN LIGHT
Rontgen's Discovery — Production of light in vacuum tubes by
electric discharges — Exhaustion of air from a tube — Geissler-
tube phenomena — The mercurial pump — Crookes's-tube pheno-
mena — Properties of Kathode light — Crookes's shadows — De-
flection of Kathode light by a magnet — Luminescent and
mechanical effects — Lenard's researches on Kathode rays in air
— Rontgen's researches — The discovery of X-rays by the lumin-
escent effect — Shadows on the luminescent screen— Transpar-
ency of aluminium — Opacity of heavy metals — Transparency of
flesh and leather — Opacity of bones^ Absence of reflexion, re-
fraction, and polarisation — Diselectrifying effects of Rontgen
rays — Improvements in PvOntgen tubes — Speculations on the
nature of Rontgen light — Seeing the invisible . . Page 238
Appendix — Other kinds of invisible Hght .... 277
LECTURE VII
RADIUM AND ITS RAYS
Emission by certain substances of radiations that will penetrate
opaque screens — Properties of uranium salts — The Becquerel
rays — Radio-activity— Examination by electroscope — Researches
of the Curies — Madame Curie discovers /^olofimm and radium
in pitchblende — Experiments with radium — Separation by
magnetic field of the three kinds of rays emitted by radium —
Strutt's radium clock — Crookes's spinthariscope — Researches
of P. Curie on heat emitted by radium, and of Rutherford on
disintegration of radium atom . , . . . 2S1
CONTENTS xiii
LECTURE VIII
THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT
Primitive sources of light — Invention of gas-lighting — Invention of
electric -lighting — Cause of incandescence — Incandescence by
electricity — Luminescence — Luminous efficiency— Photometry
— The Photometer — Inequality of distribution of light from lamps
— Inequality of composition of lights — The teaching of the
spectrum — Spectra of incandescent solids and vapours — Sensi-
tiveness of the eye to radiations of particular wave-lengths —
Absorption and emission — Measurement of emission — Bad
economy of ordinary sources of light — Light of the fire-fly —
Temperature, and quality of radiation — Emissivity of the rare
earths — High-pressure incandescent gas-lighting — Efficiency of
glow-lamps — New kinds of glow-lamps — New kinds of arc-
lamps — Electric vapour-lamps — Cost of manufacture of light —
Cheapest form of light — Future progress — Sunlight after all
Page 302
INDEX 371
LECTURE I
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
How light-waves travel — Experiments with the ripple-tank — How
shadows are cast — How to make light -waves converge and
diverge — Measurement of brightness of lights — Reflexion of
light by mirrors — Formation of images — Regular and irregular
reflexion — Diff'use reflexion by paper and rough surfaces —
Multiple images — Refraction of light— Lenses — The eye as an
optical instrument — Some curious optical experiments — Inver-
sion of images — The magic mirror of Japan — English magic
mirrors.
Light, as is known both from astronomical observations
and from experiments made with optical apparatus, travels
at a speed far exceeding that of the swiftest motion of any
material thing. Try to think of the swiftest thing on the
face of the earth. An express train at full speed, per-
haps, occurs to you. How far will it go while you
count up to ten ? Counting distinctly I take just over
5J seconds. In that time an express train would have
travelled 500 feet ! Yet a rifle-bullet would have gone
farther. There is something that goes quicker than any
actual moving thing. A sound travels faster. In the
same time a sound would travel a mile. Do you say
that a sound is only a movement in the air, a mere aerial
B
2 LIGHT LECT.
wave ? That is quite true. Sound consists ' of waves,
or rather of successions of waves in the air. None of
you who may have listened to the delightful lectures of
Professor M'Kendrick in this theatre last Christmas will
have forgotten that ; or how he used the phonograph to
record the actual mechanical movements impressed by
those air-waves as they beat against the sensitive surface
of the tympanum.
But this Christmas we have to deal with waves of a
different kind — waves of light instead of waves of sound
— and though we are still dealing with waves, yet they
are waves of quite a different sort, as we shall see.
In the first place, they travel very much faster than
waves of sound in the air. During that 5|- seconds,
while an express train could go 500 feet, or while a
sound would travel a mile, light would travel a million
miles ! A million miles ! How shall I get you to think
of that distance ? An express train going 60 miles an
hour would take 16,666^ hours, which is the same thing
as 694 days 10 hours 40 minutes. Suppose you were
now — 29th December 1896, 3 o'clock — to jump into
an express train, and that it went on and on, not only
all day and all night, but all through next year, day after
day, and all through the year after next, month after
month, until November, and that it did not stop till
24th November 1898 at 20 minutes before 2 o'clock
in the morning; by that time — nearly two years — you
would have travelled just a million miles. But the
space that an express train takes a year and eleven
months to travel, light travels in 5 J seconds — just while
you count ten !
1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 3
And not only are the waves of light different from
those of sound in their speed — they are different in size.
As compared with sound-waves they are very minute
ripples. The invisible waves of sound are of various
sizes, their lengths differing with the pitch of the sound.
The middle c of the pianoforte has a wave-length of
about 4 feet 3 inches, while the shrill notes that you can
sing may be only a few inches long. A shrill whistle
makes invisible ripples about half an inch long in the air.
But the waves of light are far smaller. The very largest
waves of all amongst the different kinds of visible light
— the red waves — are so small that you could pack
39,000 of them side by side in the breadth of one inch !
And the waves of other colours are all smaller. How
am I to make you grasp the smallness of these wavelets ?
What is the shortest thing you can think of? The thick-
ness of a pin ? Well, if a pin is only a hundredth
part of an inch thick it is still 390 times as broad as a
ripple of red light. The thickness of a human hair?
Well, if a hair is only a thousandth part of an inch thick
it is still 39 times as big as the size of a wave of red
light.
Now, from the facts that waves of light travel so fast,
and are so very minute, there follow some very important
consequences. One consequence is that the to-and-fro
motions of these little ripples are so excessively rapid —
millions of millions of times in a second — that there is
no possible way of measuring their frequency : we can
only calculate it. Another consequence is that it is
very difficult to demonstrate that they really are waves.
While a third consequence of their being so small is
4 LIGHT LECT.
that, unlike big waves, they don't spread much round
the edges of obstacles.
You have doubtless all often watched the waves on
the sea, and the ripples on a pond, and know how when
the waves or the ripples in their travelling strike against
an obstacle, such as a rock or a post, they are parted by
it, pass by it, and run round to meet behind it. But
when waves of light meet an obstacle of any ordinary
size they don't run round and meet on the other side of
it — on the contrary, the obstacle casts a shadow behind
it. If the waves of light crept round into the space
behind the obstacle, that space would not be a dark
shadow.
Well, but that is a question after all of the relative
sizes of the obstacle and of the waves. Sea waves may
meet behind a rock or a post, because the rock or the
post may not be much larger than the wave-length.^
But if you think of a big stone breakwater — much bigger
in its length than the wave-length of the waves, — you
know that there may be quite still water behind it ; in
that sense it casts a shadow. So again with sound-waves;
ordinary objects are not infinitely bigger than the size of
ordinary sound-waves. The consequence is that the
sound-waves in passing them will spread into the space
behind the obstacle. Sounds don't usually cast sharp
acoustic shadows. If a band of musicians is playing in
front of a house, you don't find, if you go round to the
^ Note that the scientific term " wave-length " means the length
from the crest of one wave to the crest of the next. This, on the
sea, may be 50 feet or more. In the case of ripples on a pond, it
may be but an inch or two. Many people would call it the breadth
of the waves rather than the length.
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 5
back of the house, that all sound is cut off. The sounds
spread round into the space behind. But if you notice
carefully you will observe that while the house does not
cut off the big waves of the drum or the trombone, it
does perceptibly cut off the smaller waves of the flute or
the piccolo. And Lord Rayleigh has often shown in
this theatre how the still smaller sound-waves of ex-
cessively shrill whistles spread still less into the space
behind obstacles. You get sharp shadows when the waves
are very small compared with the size of the obstacle.
Perhaps you will then tell me that if this argument
is correct, you ought not, even with light-waves, to get
sharp shadows if you use as obstacles very narrow
obstacles, such as needles or hairs. Well, though per-
haps you never heard it, that is exactly what is found to
be the case. The shadow of a needle or a hair, when
light from a single point or a single narrow slit is allowed
to fall upon it, is found not to be a hard black shadow.
On the contrary, the edges of the shadow are found to
be curiously fringed, and there is light right in the very
middle of the shadow caused by the waves passing by
it, spreading into the space behind and meeting there.
However, all this is introductory to the subject of
shadows in general. If we don't take special precau-
tions, or use very minute objects to cast shadows, we
shall not observe any of these curious effects. The
ordinary shadows cast by a bright light proceeding
from any luminous point are sharp-edged ; in fact, the
waves, in ordinary cases, act as though they did not
spread into the shadows, but travelled simply in straight
lines.
6 LIGHT LECT.
Let me try to illustrate the general principle of the
<■/
Fig, I.
. 1
travelling of ripples by use of a shallow tank of water,
^ Ripple-tanks for illustrating the propagation of waves have long
been known. Small tanks were used at various times by Professor
Tyndall. See also Professor Poynting, F. R.S., in Nature^ 29th
May 1884, p. 1 19.
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 7
on the surface of which I can produce ripples at will.
An electric lamp placed underneath it throws up shadows
of the ripples upon a slanting translucent screen, and
you can see, for yourselves how the ripples spread from
the centre of disturbance in concentric circles, each circle
enlarging, and the ripples following one after another at
regular distances apart. That distance is what we call
the "wave-length."
If I use the tip of my finger to produce a disturbance,
the ripples travel outward in all directions at an equal
speed. Each wave-front is therefore a circle. If, however,
I use to produce the disturbance a straight wooden ruler,
it will set up straight wavelets that follow one another in
parallel ranks. These we may describe as plane waves,
as distinguished from curved .ones. Notice how they
march forward, each keeping its distance from that in
front of it.
Now, if you have ever watched with care the ripples
on a pond, you will know that though the ripples march
forward, the water of which these ripples are composed
does not — it merely rises up and down as each ripple
comes by. The proof is simple. Throw in a bit of
cork as a float. If the water were to flow along, it would
take the cork with it. But no ; see how the cork rides
the waves. It is the motion only that travels forward
across the surface — the water simply swings to -and -
fro, or rather up and down, in its place. Now that
this has once been brought to your attention, you
will be able to distinguish between the two kinds of
movement — the apparent motion of the waves as they
travel along the surface, and the actual motion of the
8
LIGHT
LECT.
particles in the waves, which is ahvays of an oscillatory
kind.
Here is a model of a wave-motion that will make the
difference still clearer. At the top a row of little white
Fig. 2.
balls (Fig. 2) is arranged upon stems to which, in
regular order one after the other, is given an oscillatory
motion up and down. Not one of these white particles
travels along, l^^ach simply oscillates in its own place.
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 9
Yet the effect is that of a travelling wave, or rather set
of waves. The direction in which the wave travels is
transverse to the displacements of the particles. The
length from crest to crest of the waves is about 4 inches.
Their velocity of travelling depends, of course, on the
speed with which I turn the handle of the apparatus.
The amplitude of the displacement of each of the balls
is not more than one inch up or down from the centre
line.
Perhaps now you will be able to think of the little
wavelets of light, marching in ranks so close that there
are 40,000 or 50,000 of them to the inch, and having a
velocity of propagation of 185,000 miles a second.
Now let me state to you two important principles of
wave-motion — all-important in the right understanding
of the behaviour of waves of light.
(i) The first is that waves always^ march at right
angles to their own front. This is how a rank of
soldiers march — straight forward in a direction square
to the line into which they have dressed. It was so
with the water-ripples that you have already seen.
(2) The second principle is that every point of any
wave-front may be regarded as a new source or centre
from which waves will start forward in circles. Look
at the sketch (Fig. 3). From P as a centre ripples
are travelling outward in circles, for there has been a
disturbance at P. Now if there is placed in the way of
^ Always, that is to say, in free media, in gases, liquids, and
non-crystalline solids. In crystals, where the structure is such that
the elasticity differs in different directions, it is possible to have
waves niEtrching obliquely to their own front.
lO
LIGHT
LECT.
these ripples a screen, S, or obstacle, with a hole in it,
all the wave-fronts that come that way will be stopped
or reflected back, except that bit of each wave-front
that comes to the gap in the screen. That particular
bit will go on into the space beyond, but will spread at
equal speed in all directions, giving rise to a new but
fainter set of ripples which will be again of circular form,
\ \
\ \
• •»» — >■ ' ^^ — > I
I >»^ — 5^ - »> > , ^ — > I
Fig. 3.
having their centre however not at P but at the gap in
the screen. This too I can readily illustrate to you in
my ripple-tank.
The first of these two principles is really a conse-
quence of the second, and of anpther principle (that
of " interference ") which concerns the overlapping of
waves. Of these we may now avail ourselves to find
how waves will march if we know at any moment the
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
II
Fm. 4.
shape of the wave -front. Suppose (Fig. 4) we knew
that at a certain moment the wave-front of a set of
ripples had got as far
as the curved hne FF,
and that we wanted to
know where it would
be an instant later. If
we know how fast the
wave travels we can
think of the time taken
to travel some short
space such as half an
inch. Take then a pair
of compasses and open
them out to half an
inch. Then put the
point of the compasses at some part — say a — of the curve
FF, and strike out the piece of circle as shown at a'.
That is where the disturbance would spread to in that
short interval of time if the bit of wave-front at a had
alone been allowed to spread forward. But the bit at b
is also spreading, so we must strike another arc, using b
as centre, and another at ^, and another at , and so on,
using the same radius for all of them. And now we see
that if all these bits, instead of acting each separately,
are acting at the same time, the wavelets from each will
overlap and give us one large enveloping curve at GG ;
the effect being the same as though the wave-front FF
had itself marched forward to GG. Those parts of the
wavelets that tend to spread cross-ways in the over-
lapping balance one another ; for instance, part of the
12 LIGHT LECT.
wavelet from a tends to cross downwards in front of r,
while a part of the wavelet from e tends to cross upwards
to an equal amount. These sideway effects cancel one
another, with the result that the effect is the same on
the whole as though the bit of wave at c had simply
marched straight forward to c.
Perhaps you will say that if this is true then when
light-waves meet an obstacle some light ought to spread
round into the shadow at the edges. And so it does as
has already been said. But, owing to the exceeding
smallness of the light-waves compared with the dimen-
sions of ordinary objects, the spreading is so slight as to
be unnoticed. In fact, except when we are dealing
with the shadows of very thin objects, like hairs and
pins, or with mere edges, the light behaves as though it
simply travelled in straight lines.^
Our next business is to show how ripples can be
made to diverge and converge. If we take a point as
our source of the ripples, then they will of themselves
spread or diverge from that point in all directions in
circles, each portion of each wave-front having a bulg-
ing form. If we take as the source a flat surface, so as
to get plane waves, they march forward as plane waves
^ This is all that is meant by the old statement that light travels
in "rays." There really are no rays. The harder one tries to
isolate a "ray" by itself, by letting light go first through a narrow
slit or pinhole, and then passing it through a second slit or pinhole,
the more do we find it impossible ; for then we notice the tend-
encies to spread more than ever. If the word "ray" is to be
retained at all in the science of optics, it must be understood to
mean nothing more than the geometrical line along which a piece
of the wave-front marches.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
13
Fig. 5.
without either diverging or converging. If, however, we
can in any way so manage our experiments as to get
ripples with a hollow front
instead of a bulging front,
then the succeeding ripples
will converge as they march.
This is shown in Fig. 5.
Suppose FF is a hollow wave-
front marching forward to-
ward the right. Think of the
bit of wave-front at a. After
a short interval of time it
would spread (were it alone)
to^^'. Similarly^ would spread
to b\ and so on, so that when
all these separate wavelets overlap, the effect is the same
as though there the wave-front FF had marched to GG,
closing in as it marches. After the lapse of another
equally short interval it will have closed in to HH. It is
clear that, on the principle that waves alw^ays march at
right angles to their own front, they tend all to march
inwards and meet at a new centre somewhere at Q.
Suppose you ranged a row of soldiers in a curve like
FF, and told each soldier to march straight forward be-
tween his comrades. If each soldier were to march at
right angles to the curved line, they would all be march-
ing toward a common centre, and would close in against
one another !
Now it is obviously easy to make waves of light
diverge — they do so of themselves if the source of light
be a point. We shall see later how to make them con-
14 LIGHT LECT.
verge ; but, meantime, we will use what we know about
divergence to help us to measure the relative brightness
of two lights.
Here is a little electric glow-lamp. The shopman
who sold it to me says that when it is supplied with
electric current at the proper pressure,^ it will give as
much light as sixteen candles. I switch on the current
and it shines. I light a standard candle,^ so that you
can compare the brightness for yourselves. Do you
think that the glow-lamp is really sixteen times as bright
as the candle? Your eye is really a very unreliable
judge ^ of the relative brightness. We must, therefore,
find some way of balancing the brighter and the less
bright lights against one another. The instrument for
doing this is called a photometer.
^ Electric pressure, or "voltage," is measured in terms of the
unit of electric pressure called the "volt." The usual electric pres-
sure of the conductors which branch from the supply-mains into a
house is lOO volts.
^ The standard candle prescribed by the regulations of the
Board of Trade as the legal standard of light in Great Britain is a
sperm candle burning 120 grains of spermaceti per hour.
^ This unreliability of the eye to form a numerically correct
judgment is partly dependent on the physiological fact that the sen-
sation is never numerically proportional to the stimulus. Though
the stimulus be 16 times as great, the sensation perceived by the
brain is not 16 times as great. The rule (Fechner's law) is that
the sensation is proportional to the natural logarithm of the
stimulus. The natural logarithm of 16 is 277 ; that is to say, the
light that is 16 times as bright as I ,candle only produces a sensa-
tion 277 times as great. A single light of 100 candle brilliancy
only produces a sensation 4*6 times as great as that of I candle.
Besides this the iris diaphragm of the eye automatically reduces the
size of the pupil when a brighter light shines into the eye, making
the eye less sensitive.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
15
But before we can understand the photometer we
must first think about the degree of illumination which
a light produces when it falls upon a white surface. I
take here a piece of white cardboard one inch square.
If I hold it close to my candle it catches a great
deal of the light, and is brightly illuminated. If I
hold it farther away it is less brightly illuminated.
We can, therefore, alter the illumination of the sur-
face by altering the distance. But we cannot use this
principle for calculations about brightness until we
know the rule that connects the distance with the
degree of illumination ; and that rule depends upon the
way in which light spreads when it starts from a point.
Fig. 6.
Suppose we think of the whole quantity of light that is
spreading all round from a point. Of all that amount
of light what fraction will be caught by this square inch
of cardboard when I hold it a foot away? Not very
much. But now think of that same amount of light as
as it goes on spreading. Fig. 6 shows you that by the
time that the light has travelled out from the centre to
double the distance it will have spread (according to the
law of rectilinear propagation discussed above) so that
the diverging beam is now twice as broad each way.
It will now cover a cardboard square that is 2 inches
each way, or that has 4 square inches of surface. So if
the same amount of light that formerly fell on i square
inch ^s now spread over 4 square inches of surface, it
i6 LIGHT LECT.
follows that each of those 4 square inches is only
illuminated one quarter as brightly as before. If you
had a bit of butter to spread upon a piece of bread —
and then you were told that you must spread the same
piece of butter over a piece of bread of four times the
surface, you know that the layer of butter would be
only the quarter as thick ! And so again, if I let the
light spread still farther, by the time it has gone three
times as far it will have spread over nine times the
surface, and the degree of illumination on any one square
inch at that treble distance will be only one-ninth part
as great as at first. This is the so-called law of "inverse
squares," and is simply the geometrical consequence^
of the circumstance that the light is spreading from a
point. Now we are ready to deal with the balancing of
two lights. By letting two lights shine on a piece of card-
board, or rather on two neighbouring pieces, and then
altering the distance of one of the lights until both
pieces of card are equally illuminated, we can get a
balance of effects, and then calculate from the squares
of the distances how bright the lights were. The eye,
which is a very bad judge of relative unequal bright-
nesses is really a very fair judge (and by practice can be
trained to be a very accurate judge) of the equality of
illumination of two neighbouring patches. But we must
make our arrangements so that only one light shines
^ The fact that a candle flame is not a mere point introduces a
measurable error in photometry. It cannot be too clearly under-
stood that the law of inverse - squares is never applicable strictly
except to effects spreading from points. This criticism applies also
to the use or misuse of the law of inverse-squares in magnetism and
electricity.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
17
upon each patch. One simple way of doing this is to
let each light cast a
shadow of a stick on
a white surface, so that
each light shines into
the shadow cast by
the other. If you alter
the distances till the
shadows are equally
dark, then you know
that the illumination
of each is equal. But
a better way is to
arrange matters that
the two illuminated
patches are actually
superposed. Here is
a very simple and
effective way of doing
it. Two pieces of
white cardboard, A
and B (Fig. 7), form-
ing a V-shape, are set
upon a stand, between
the two lights that are
to be compared. One
light shines upon the
surface of A, and the
other upon the surface
of B. Through A are
cut a number of slots or holes, so that the illuminated
G
i8 LIGHT LECT.
surface of B is seen through the slots in A. If the
illumination of A is duller than that of B the slots will
seem dark between the brighter bars of the front card ;
but if the illumination of A is brighter than that of B
then the slots will seem bright between dull bars.^ By
moving one of the lights nearer or farther away, the
respective illuminations can be altered until balance is
obtained ; and then the relative values are calculated
from the squares of the distances. With this photometer
let us now test our electric lamp to see if it is really
worth sixteen candles. I put it on the photometer
bench and move it backward and forward till the lights
balance. You see it balances when rather less than
four times as far away as the standard candle. It is,
therefore, of not quite sixteen candle-power.
Another very simple and accurate photometer is
made by taking two small slabs of paraffin wax (such as
candles are made of) and putting them back to back
^ This form of photometer is a modification by Mr. A. P.
Trotter, M.A. , of Cape Town, of the reHef photometer invented in
1883 by the author and Mr. C. C. Starling. To prevent error
arising from internal reflexion the back of the card A should be
blackened. By setting the support at a fixed distance from the
standard light on the left side, and altering, as needed to obtain
balance, the distance of the light of which the brightness is to be
measured, it is possible to make the instrument direct-reading ; the
scale to the right of the support being graduated so as to read not
the actual distances but their squares. For instance, if the distance
of the middle slot from the standard light be I metre, then on the
other side the graduation must read I at I metre ; 4 at 2 metres ;
9 at 3 metres, and so forth. Accuracy of reading is promoted by
the circumstance that when balance has been found for the middle
slot of A the slots to the left of the middle will look darker, and
those to the right brighter than the central one.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
19
with a sheet of tin-foil or black paper between them.
They are then placed (as in Fig. 8) on the graduated
bench between the lights whose
brightness- is to be compared to-
gether, and set in such a way that
one light shines on one paraffin
slab, and the other light on the
other slab, as in Fig. 9. If the
illuminations on the two sides
balance the edges of the slabs will seem equally bright.
But if the illumination on one face is stronger than
that on the other then that paraffin slab which is
more highly illuminated will seem brighter at its edge
than the other.^ This is because of the translucent or
Fig. 9.
^ This paraffin slab photometer is the invention of Dr. Joly,
F.R.S., of Dublin. It is an exceedingly satisfactory instrument.
^Iitll^?-J. > »>_._ ^1
7K
/ w \,
_^^ Light No. 2
Fig.
Either of these two forms of instrument here described is preferable
to the old-fashioned "grease-spot" photometer of Bunsen. But
both are surpassed in accuracy by the precision -photometer of
20 LIGHT LECT.
semi-opaque property of paraffin wax, which results in
a diffusion of the light laterally. With this photometer
it is very easy to balance the brightness of two lights,
even if their tint be not quite identical. In Germany,
they employ as standard, instead of a sperm candle, the
little Hefner lamp filled with a chemical liquid known
as amyl-acetate. But it has — as you see — the serious
disadvantage of giving out a light which is unfortunately
of a redder tint than most of our other lights. To be
quite suitable, the lamp that we choose as a standard of
light ought to be not only one that will give out a fixed
quantity of light, but one that is irreproachable in the
quality of its whiteness : it should be a standard of
white light. Perhaps now that acetylene gas is so
easily made it may serve as a standard, for as yet
none of the proposed electric standards seem quite
satisfactory.
Let us pass on to the operation of reflecting light by
means of mirrocs. A piece of polished metal such as
Brodhun and Lummer, which can, however, only be described here
very briefly. It gives determinations that can be reHed on to within
one-half of one per cent. The two lights to be compared are caused
to shine on the two opposite faces of a small opaque white screen, W
(Fig. lo). The eye views these two sides, as reflected in two small
mirrors, M^^ and M^, by means of a special prism-combination, con-
sisting, as shown, of two right-angled prisms of glass, A and B,
which are cemented together with balsam over only a small part of
their hypotenuse surfaces; the light from M^ can pass direct through
this central portion to the eye, but the uncemented portions of the
hypotenuse surface of B act by total internal reflexion and bring the
light from Mo to the eye. The eye, therefore, virtually sees a patch
of one surface of W surrounded by a patch of the other surface of
W, and hence can judge very accurately as to whether they are
equally illuminated or not.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
21
silver, or a silvered glass, will reflect the waves of light,
and so, though in an inferior degree, will any other
material if only its surface be sufficiently smooth. By
sufficiently smooth I mean that the ridges or scratches
or roughnesses of its surface are decidedly smaller than
the wave-length of the light. If the scratches or ridges
on a surface are in width less than a quarter of the wave-
length (in the case of light, therefore, less than about
2o"Fooo inch) they do not cause any breaking up of
the waves ; and such surfaces are, for optical purposes,
quite "smooth." Indeed that is the usual way of
polishing things. You scratch them all over with some
sort of very fine powder that makes scratches finer than
of an inch.
20^000
Now the rebound of waves when they beat against a
polished surface, whether that surface be a flat one or
a curved one, can be studied by applying the same
principles of wave-motion that we have already learned.
In Fig. II we have light starting from a point at P and
22 LIGHT LECT.
spreading. If a smooth obstacle, SS, is placed in the
path of these waves they will meet it, but some parts of
the wave-front will meet it before other parts. Think
of the bit of the wave-front that meets the mirror at a.
If it had not been stopped, it would after a brief
moment of time have got as far as a . But having
bounded back from the surface it will set up a wavelet
that will spread backwards at the same rate. Therefore,
draw with your compasses the wavelet d\ using as radius
the length a a. The next bit of the wave -front b
reaches the surface of the mirror a little later. The
length from thence to b' is therefore a little shorter than
a a. So take that shorter length as radius and strike
out the wavelet b" . Completing the set of wavelets in
the same way we get the final curve of the reflected
wave, which you see will now march backwards as
though it had come from some point Q on the other
side of the mirror. In fact, if the mirror is a flat one,
Q will be exactly as far behind the surface as P is in
front of it. We call the point Q tlie "image" of the
point P. This reflexion of ripples as though they had
come from a point behind the mirror I can show you
by aid of my ripple-tank. I put in a flat strip of lead to
serve as a reflector — see how the waves as they come up
to it march off with their curvature reversed, as though
they had started from some point behind the reflecting
surface.
Again I can show you the same thing with a candle
and a looking-glass. You know that we can test the
direction in which light is coming by looking at the
direction in which a shadow is cast by it. If I set up
1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 23
(Fig. 12) this little dagger on a whitened board I can
see which way its shadow falls. If now I place a candle
beside it on the board at P it casts a shadow of the
dagger on the side away from P. Next, set up a piece
of silvered mirror glass a little farther along the board.
We have now two shadows. One is the direct shadow
which was previously cast ; the other is the shadow cast
by the waves that have been reflected in the mirror, and
Fig.
you see by the direction in which this second shadow
falls that it falls just as if the light had come from a
second candle placed at Q, just as far behind the mirror
as P is in front. Let us put an actual second candle at
Q, and then take away the mirror, and you see the
second shadow in the same place and of the same shape
as before. So we have proved by direct experiment that
our reasoning about the waves was correct. Indeed,
24 LIGHT LECT.
you have only to look into a flat mirror, and examine
the images of things in it, to satisfy yourselves about
the rule. The images of objects are always exactly
opposite the objects, and are each as far behind the
mirror as the object is in front. Probably you have
all heard of the savage prince captured by sailors,
who, when he was taken on board ship and shown a
mirror hanging on a wall, wanted to run round to
see the other savage prince whom he saw on the other
side !
If instead of using flat mirrors we use curved ones,
w^e find different rules to be observed. That is because
the curved surfaces print new curvatures on the wave-
fronts, causing them to alter their lines of march. There
are, as you know, tw^o sorts of curvatures. The surface
may bulge out — ^in which case we call it convex ; or it
may be hollowed — in which case we call it a concave
surface.
In my ripple tank I now place a curved piece of
metal with its bulging side toward the place where I
make the ripples. Suppose now I send a lot of plane
ripples to beat against this surface ; the part of the
wave-front that strikes first against the bulging curve is
the earliest to be reflected back. The other parts strike
the surface later, and when reflected back have fallen
behind ; so that the ripples come back curved — the
curved mirror has, in fact, imprinted upon the ripples
a curvature twice as great as its own curvature. This
can be seen from Fig. 13, where we consider the straight
ripples marching to meet the bulging reflector. The
middle point M of the bulging surface meets the advan-
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
25
cing wave first and turns that bit back. If there had
been no obstacle the wave would, after a short interval
of time, have got as far as A. But where will it actually
go to ? The bit that strikes M will go back as far as
B ; the bit marked a will go on a little, and then be
reflected back. Take
C
your compasses again
and measure the dis-
tance it still has to go
to a ^ and then turn-
ing the compasses
strike out the arc a.
Do the same for the
bits marked b and c,
and you will find the
overlapping wavelets
Fig. 13.
to give you the new outline of the reflected wave,
which marches backwards as though it had started from
the point marked F. This point F is half-way between
M and the centre of curvature of the surface. The
centre is marked C in the drawing.
So, again, if I use as reflector a hollow or concave-
curved surface, it will imprint upon the waves a concave
form, the imprinted curvature being twice as great as
the curvature of the reflecting surface. But now we
come upon a new effect. See in my ripple-tank how,
when the straight ripples beat against the concave
surface, so that the middle part of the wave-front is the
last to rebound, all the other parts have already re-
bounded and are marching back, the returning ripples
being curved inwards. In fact, you see that, being
26
LIGHT
LECT.
themselves now curved ripples with hollow wave-fronts,
they converge inwards upon one another, and march back
toward the point F. A bit of the wave -front at P
marches straight until it strikes the mirror at R. Then
instead of going on to Q it is reflected inward and
travels to F, toward which point other parts of the wave
also travel. Here then we have found a real focus or
meeting point of the waves ; not, as in the preceding
cases, a virtual focus from which the waves seemed to
Fig. 14.
come. We have then learned that, for ripples at least,
a concave mirror may produce a real convergence to a
point.
Let us at once show that the same thing can be done
with light-waves by using a concave silvered mirror.
From my optical lantern, with its internal electric
lamp, my assistant causes a broad beam of light to
stream forth. The air is dusty, and each little particle
of dust catches a portion of the beam, and helps you
to see which way it is marching. Li this beam I hold a
eoSTON COLlf«E » >BKAK\
CHESTNUT HJLL. MASS.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
27
concave silvered mirror. At once you see how by print-
ing a curvature upon the waves it forces the beam to
converge (Fig, 15) upon a point here in mid-air. That
point is the focus. You will further notice that by
turning the mirror about I can shift the position of the
Fig. 15.
focus, and concentrate the waves in different places at
will.
If I replace the concave mirror by a convex one, I
shall cause a divergence of the waves. No longer is
there any real focus, but the waves now march away
as if they had come from a virtual focus behind the
mirror at F (Fig. 16), precisely as we saw for the ripples
in the ripple-tank.
We have now got as far as the making of real images
< r*
28
LIGHT
LECT.
by so changing the shapes of the wave-fronts and their
consequent Unes of march as to cause them to converge to
focal points. Let us try a few more experiments on the
formation of images. Removing from the optical lantern
all its lenses, let us simply leave inside it the electric
lamp. You know that in this lamp there are two pencils
of carbon, the tips of which do not quite touch, and
Fig. 16.
which are made white-hot by the flow of the electric
current between them. I cover up the opening in front
of the lantern by a piece of tin-foil, and in this I now
stab a small round hole with a pointed stiletto. At
once you see thrown on the screen an image (Fig. 17)
of the two white-hot tips of the carbon pencils. The
positive carbon has a flat end, the negative tip is pointed.
That image is inverted as a matter of fact, and its forma-
tion on the screen is a mere consequence of the rectilinear
JHUdTOi^ COLLEGE LIBJialtV
. CMMTOUT HaL, MAm
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 29
propagation of the light. If I stab another hole we shall
have another image. This time I have pierced a square
hole, but the second image is just the same as the first,
and does not depend on the shape of the hole. I pierce
again a three-cornered hole — still another image. If I
pierce a whole lot of holes I get just as many images,
and they are arranged in a sort of pattern, which exactly
corresponds to the pattern of holes I have pierced in
the tin-foil.
Now if I wanted to produce one single bright image
instead of a lot of little images scattered about, I must in
Fig.
17-
some way manage so to turn these various beams that
they shall all converge upon the same region of the screen.
In other words, the formation of bright images can be
effected by using some appliance which will imprint a
convergence upon the waves. You know that a concave
mirror will do this. . Very well, let me use a concave
mirror. See how, when we choose one of the proper
curvature to converge the light upon the screen, it blends
all the images together, and gives us one bright image.
We may remove our tin-foil cap altogether, so as to work
3© LIGHT LECT.
with the whole beam, and we get a still more brilliant
image of the carbon points.
Substituting for the arc-lamp a group of little coloured
electric glow-lamps, I cause their beams to be reflected
out into the room by my concave mirror, and here, by
trying with a hand -screen of thin translucent paper,
you see how I can find the real image of the group of
lamps. This image is inverted ; and being in this case
formed at a distance from the mirror greater than that
of the object, it is magnified. If the object is removed
to a greater distance the image comes still nearer in ;
and is then of diminished size, though still inverted.
So far we have been dealing with the regular reflexion
that takes place at properly polished surfaces. But if
the surfaces are not properly polished — that is, if their
ridges or scratches or roughnesses are not sensibly smaller
than the size of waves, then, though they may still
reflect, the reflexion is irregular. White paper reflects
in this diffuse way. You do not get any definite images,
because the slight roughnesses of the texture break
up the wave-fronts and scatter them in all directions.
That is why a white sheet of paper looks white from
whichever aspect you regard it. If the substance is one
which, like silk, has a definite fibre or grain that reflects
a little better in one direction than in another, then the
quantity of light reflected will depend partly upon the
direction in which the grain catches the light, and partly
upon the angle at which the light is inclined to the
surface. This is easily demonstrated by examining the
appearance of a piece of metal electrotyped in exact
facsimile of a piece of silk fabric. Here is such a
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 31
piece. It was deposited ^ in a gutta-percha mould cast
upon a piece of figured silk brocade ; it reproduces the
exact shimmer of silk, because it reproduces the grain
of the silk in its operation of partial reflexion. If silk
is woven with warp of one colour and weft of another,
the different colours are better reflected at certain angles
— hence the effect produced by "shot" silk.
To illustrate the property of diffuse reflexion let me
show you two simple experiments. Here is a piece of
mirror. Upon it I paint with Chinese white the word
LIGHT. The letters look white on a dark background.
But if I use it to reflect upon the wall a patch of light
from the electric lamp the letters come out black. The
light that fell on those parts was scattered in all direc-
tions — so those parts looked white to you, but they
have diffused the waves instead of directing them
straight to the wall as the other smooth parts of the
surface do.
Let me prove to you how much light is really reflected
from a piece of paper. I have merely to shine my
lamp upon this piece of white paper, and hold it near
the cheek of this white marble bust for you to see for
yourselves what an amount of light it actually reflects
upon the object. Exchanging the white paper for a
^ Made at the Technical College, Finsbury, by Mr. E. Rousseau,
instructor in electro-deposition. His process of casting, in a molten
compound of gutta-percha, the matrices, which are afterwards metal-
lised to receive the deposit in the electrotype bath, is distinctly superior
to the commercial process of taking moulds in a hydraulic press.
On one occasion he took for me a mould of a Rowland's diffraction
grating, having 14,400 parallel lines to the inch. Like the original
it showed most gorgeous diffraction colours.
32
LIGHT
LECT.
piece of red paper, — that is to say of paper that reflects
red waves better than waves of any other colour, — and
you see how the red light is thrown back upon the
bust, and brings an artificial blush to its cheek.
If light is reflected from one mirror to another one
standing at an angle with the first, two or more images
Fig. i8.
may be formed, according to the position of the mirrors.
Here (Fig. i8) are two flat mirrors hinged together
like the leaves of a book. If I open them out to an
angle equal to one-third of a circle — namely, 120° — and
then place a candle between them, each mirror will make
an image, so that, when you peep in between the mirrors,
there will seem to be three candles. If I fold the mirrors
a little nearer, so that they enclose a quadrant of a circle
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 33
— or are at right angles — then there will seem to be four
candles, one real one and three images. If I shut the
angle up to 72° — or one-fifth of a circle — then there will
seem to be five candles. Or to 60° — one-sixth of a circle
— then there appear six candles. This is the principle
of the toy called the Kaleidoscope^ with which some most
beautiful and curious combinations of patterns and
colours can be obtained by the multiplication of images.
Even with two such mirrors as these some quaint effects
are possible. When nearly shut up, a single light
between them seems to be drawn out into a whole
ring of images. Open them out to 72° or to a right
angle, and try the effect of putting your two. hands sud-
denly between the mirrors. Ten hands or eight hands
(according to the angle chosen) simultaneously appear
as if by magic. Place between the mirrors a wedge of
Christmas cake, and shut up the mirrors till they touch
the sides of the wedge, — you will see a whole cake
appear.
It is now time to pass on to another set . of optical
effects which depend upon the rate at which the waves
travel. I have told you how fast they travel in the air —
186,400 miles a second, or (if you will calculate it out
by a reduction sum) one foot in about the thousand-
millionth part of one second. Well, but light does not
go quite so fast through water as through air — only
about three-fourths as fast ; that is, it goes in water only
at the rate of about 138,000 miles a second, or only
about nine inches in the thousand-millionth part of a
second. And in common glass it goes still slower. On
the average — for glasses differ in their com.position, and
34
LIGHT
LECT.
therefore in the retardation they produce on light-waves
— Hght only goes about two-thirds as fast as in air. That
is, while light would travel one foot through air, it would
only travel about eight inches through glass.
Now as a consequence of this difference in speed
it follows quite simply that if the waves strike obliquely
against the surface of water or of glass that part of the
wave-front that enters first into the denser medium
goes more slowly, and the other part which is going on
for a little longer time though air gains on the part that
entered first, and so the direction of the wave-front is
changed, and the line of march is also changed. Let
us study it a little more precisely. If waves of light
I proceeding from a point
^% P strike against the top
; \\ surface of a block of
glass, as in Fig. 19, how
will the retardation that
they experience on enter-
ing affect their march ?
Suppose that at a certain
moment a ripple has got
as far as FF'. If it had
been going on through
air it would, after a very
short interval of time, have got as far as GG'. But
it has struck against the glass, and the part that goes
in first instead of going as far as G' will only get
two-thirds as far. So once more take your compasses,
and strike off a set of arcs for the various wavelets,
in each case taking as the arc two -thirds of the dis-
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 35
tance that the Ught would have had to go if after
passing the surface it could have gone on to GG'. The
overlapping wavelets build up the new wave-front HG',
which you notice is a flatter curve, and has its centre
somewhere farther back at Q. In fact, the effect of the
glass in retarding the wave is to flatten its curvature and
alter its march, so that in going on through the glass it
will progress as though it had come not from P, but
from Q, a point i|- times as far away. Consider the
bit of wave-front that has been marching down the line
PG'. When it enters the ' glass its line of march is
changed — instead of going on along G'A it goes more
steeply down G'B, as though it had come from Q. This
abrupt change of direction along a broken path, caused
by the entrance into a denser ^ medium, is known by the
term refraction. Glass refracts more than water does ;
heavy crystal glass (containing lead) refracts more than
the light sorts of glass used for window-panes and bottles;
while many other substances have a still higher refrac-
tivity.
Now, we can use this property of the refracting sub-
stances to produce convergence and divergence of light-
waves, because, as you see, when we want to imprint a
curvature on the wave-fronts, we can easily do this by
using the retardation of water or of glass. Suppose we
wanted to alter a plane-wave so as to make it converge
to a focus, what we have got to do is to retard the
middle part of the wave-front a little, so that the other
^ "Denser," in its optical sense, means the same thing as more
retarding. Compare with what is said on p. 62 in the Appendix to
this Lecture.
36
LIGHT
LECT.
parts shall gain on it. It will then be concave in shape,
and therefore will march to a focus. What sort of a
piece of glass will do this ? A mere window-pane wil^
not. A thick slab will not, seeing it is equally thick all
over. Clearly it must be a piece of glass that is thicker
at one part than another. Well, suppose w^e take a
piece of glass that is thicker in the middle than at the
edges, what will it do ? Suppose that, as in Fig. 20,
we have some plane-waves coming along, and that we
put in their path a piece of glass that is flat on one face
and bulging on the other face. Think of the time when
a wave-front has arrived at GG. A moment later where
will it be ? The middle part that strikes at M will be going
through glass to B. This distance MB we know will be
only two-thirds as great as the distance to which it would
go in air. Had it gone on in air it would have gone as
far as A, the length MA being drawn ij times as great
as MB. The edge parts of the wave-front go almost
wholly through air, and will gain on the middle part.
So the new wave-front, instead of being flat through
HAH, will be curved concavely in the shape HBH ;
1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 37
and as a result the wave will march on converging to
meet at F in a real focus.^ It would be the same if the
piece of glass were turrj^d round the other way, with its
bulging face toward the light ; it would still imprint a
concavity on the advancing wave and make it converge
to a focus. This is exactly how a burning-glass acts.
With my ripple -tank I am able to imitate these
effects, but not very accurately, because the only way I
have of slowing the ripples is to make the water shal-
lower where retardation is to be produced. This I do
by inserting a piece of plate glass cut to the proper shape.
Where the ripples pass over the edge of the submerged
piece of glass they travel more slowly. Where they meet*
the edge obliquely the direction of their march is changed
— they are refracted. Where they pass over a lens-
shaped piece they are converged toward a focus.
It is, however, more convincing to show these things
with light-waves themselves. Let me first show you
refraction upon the optical circle by the aid (Fig. 21) of
a special apparatus ^ for directing the beam toward the
centre at any desired angle. Placing a large optical
circle with its face toward you and its back to the lantern,
I can throw the light obliquely upon the top surface of
^ From Fig. 20 it is easy to see that the curvature of the im-
pressed HAH is just half (if MB = § MA) of the curvature of the
glass surface. Hence it follows that the focal length of the plano-
convex lens (if of glass having a refractivity of I J) is equal to twice
the radius of curvature of the lens-surface. In the case of double-
convex lenses, each face imprints a curvature upon the wave as it
passes through. See Appendix to Lecture I. p. 65.
^ This apparatus, which can be fitted to any ordinary lantern,
consists of three mirrors at 45° carried upon an arm affixed to a
38
LIGHT
LECT.
a piece of glass, the under surface of which has been
ground to a semi-cylinder
(jj^ig. 22). The refracted
beam emerges at a differ-
ent angle, its line of march
having been made more
steeply oblique by the
retardation of the glass.
If you measure the angles
not in degrees but by the
straight distances across
the circle, you will find
that, for the kind of glass
I am using, the proportion between the length CD (the
sleeve that fits the condenser-tube, as in Fig. 21. The beam after
three reflexions comes radially back across the axis of the con-
FlG. 22.
densers ; and by turning the arm around in the condenser-tube can
be used at any angle.
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
39
sine of refraction) and the length AB (the sine of inci-
dence) is ahvays just the proportion of 2 to 3, whatever
the obliquity of the incident beam. When the incident
beam falls at grazing incidence most of it is reflected
and never enters the glass, and the part that does enter
is refracted down at an angle known as the critical or
limiting angle.
With this same optical circle I am able to show you
another phenomenon,
that of total internal re-
flexion. If I send the
light upwards through the
glass hemisphere (Fig.
23), at an angle beyond
that of the critical angle,
none of it will come up
through the surface ; all
will be reflected inter-
nally at the under side,
the top surface acting as
a polished mirror. You can see the same effect with
a tumbler full of water with a spoon in it.
This same phenomenon of total reflexion can be
beautifully illustrated by the luminous cascade or fairy
fountain. I allow water to stream out of a nozzle, and
shine light in behind through a window into the cistern
from which the water flows. It falls in a parabolic curve,
the light following it internally down to the place where
the jet breaks (Fig. 24) into drops.
Total reflexion can also be illustrated by shining
light into one end of a solid glass rod, along whichp
Fig. 23.
40
LIGHT
LECT.
though it is of a bent and crooked shape, the light
travels until it comes to the other end.
Returning now to the use of lenses to cause the
waves to converge and diverge, we will adjust our lan-
tern to send out a straight beam, and then interpose in
Fig. 24.
the path a lens made of glass thicker in the middle
than at the edges. At once it is observed — thanks to
the dust in the air — to make these waves converge to a
focus at F (Fig. 25). This is again a real focus. A lens
that is thus thicker in the middle than at the edges is
called a convex k?is.
Had we taken a piece of glass that is thinner in the
1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 41
middle than at the edges — a concave lens — the effect
Fig. 25
would be the opposite. Since the thin middle retards
the mid parts of the wave-front less than the thick glass
Fig. 26.
edges retard the edge parts, the middle part of the
42 LIGHT LECT.
wave-front will gain on the outlying parts, and the wave
will emerge as a bulging wave, and will therefore march
as if diverging from some virtual focus.
You will not have failed to note that this property of
lenses to converge or diverge light depends on the fact
that light travels slower in glass than in air ; and you will
perhaps wonder what would be the effect if there were
no change in the speed of travelling. Well, that is a
very simple matter to test. If the action of the lens
depends upon the difference of speed of light in the
glass and in the surrounding medium, what ought to be
the result of surrounding the glass lens with some other
medium than air ? Suppose we try water. The speed
of light in water is less than in air — it is more nearly
like that in glass. And if the action depends on differ-
ence of speed, then a glass lens immersed in water ought
to have a less action than the same glass lens in air.
Try it, and you see at once that when immersed in
water a magnifying glass does not magnify as much as
it does in air. A burning-glass does not converge the
rays so much when immersed in water ; its focus is
farther away. Nay, I have here a lens which you see
unquestionably magnifies. I immerse it in this bath of
oil — and behold it acts as a minifying lens — it makes
the beam diverge instead of converge ! Carry the
argument on to its logical conclusion. If the effect of
the medium is so important, what would be the effect
of taking a lens of air (enclosed between two thin walls
of glass) and surrounding it by a bath of water or oil ?
If the reasoning is right, a concave air lens in oil ought
to act like a convex glass lens in air, and a convex air
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
43
^^^t£
--^^-
~_~_"
-——j^—
.__^™,^
"^-
---
^
~-J-
g
-'--t. >r-
Ls^^gs^r^; -:=^
h
Fig. 27.
lens in oil like a concave glass lens in air. Let us put
it to the test of experiment. Here is a concave air lens.
In air it neither converges nor diverges .the light — the
speed inside and outside the
lens is the same — therefore
there is no action. But plunge
it in oil (Fig. 27) and, see, it
brings the beam to a focus --_ i[-:-vJ-t".-:-."Ji-:::-i'"-^>p
(F) exactly as a convex glass
lens in air would do.
Let me sum up this part
of my subject by simply
saying that lenses and curved mirrors can change the
march of light-waves by imprinting new curvatures on
the wave-fronts. Indeed, speaking strictly, that is all
that any lens or mirror, or combination of lenses or of
mirrors, can do.
Now the human eye, that most wonderful of all
optical instruments, is a combination of lenses within a
cartilaginous ball, the back of which is covered on its
inner face with an exquisitely fine structure of sensitive
cells, through which are distributed ramifications of the
optic nerve. All that that nerve can do is to feel the
impressions that fall upon it and convey those impres-
sions to the brain. All else must be done on the one
hand by the lens-apparatus that focuses the waves of light
on the retina, or on the other hand by the brain that is
conscious of the impressions conveyed to it. With neither
the nerve-structures nor with the brain are these lectures
concerned. We have merely to treat of the eye as a
combination of lenses that focuses images on the retina.
44
LIGHT
LECT.
Consider a diagram (Fig. 28) of the structures of the
human eyeball. The greater part of the refractive
effect is accomplished by a beautiful piece of trans-
parent horny substance known as the crystalline lens
(L^), which is situated just behind the iris or coloured
diaphragm of the eye. The pupil, or hole through the
iris, leads straight toward the middle of this crystalline
C the cornea.
R the retina.
N the optic nerve.
Li aqueous humour.
L2 the crystalline lens.
L3 vitreous humour.
i the iris diaphragm.
b the blind spot.
y the yellow spot, or 7na-
cula lutea.
Fig. 28.
lens. But it is immersed in a medium, or rather between
two media, a watery medium (L ) in front and a gelatin-
ous one (L ) behind ; the latter filling up the rest of
the globe of the eyeball. The crystalline lens has
therefore a less magnifying power than it would have
if it were immersed in air. It acts very much as a
lens in water. But the watery liquid in front of it
also acts as a lens, since it occupies the space in front
of the crystalline lens and between it and the trans-
I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 45
parent cornea^ the bulging window of the eye. Taken
together these form a lens - combination adapted to
form images upon that back-screen or retina^ R, where
are spread out the sensitive nerve structures. All
that the eye can do as an optical instrument can be
imitated by optical combinations of lenses. An ordinary
photographic camera may be regarded as a sort of
artificial eye. In front is a combination of lenses the
function of which is to focus images upon a back screen,
or upon a plate which is made chemically sensitive.
To make the analogy more complete one ought to
think of the eye as a kind of camera in which the
hollow body is filled up with a thin transparent watery
jelly, and in which also the space between the front
lens and the one behind it is full of water.
Apart from the complication introduced by the
watery and gelatinous media, it is very easy to imitate
the optical arrangements of the eye by lenses. Any
photographic camera will serve indeed for the purpose.
Its lens combination throws upon the screen at the
back real images of the objects placed in front.
As in the camera, so in the eyeball, the images
thrown on the back are inverted images. If you have
not thought of this before it seems hard to believe it :
nevertheless it is true. You have all your lives had the
images inverted. Your brains, while you were yet
babies learned to associate the impression received on
the lower part of the retina with objects high above
you. However you may explain or doubt, the facts
are simply what they are : the images are upside-down
at the back of your eyeball.
46
LIGHT
I,ECT.
Beside the general proof afforded by camera-images,
there are two extremely simple proofs of this fact. The
first any of you can try at home ; all the apparatus it
needs being a common pin and a bit of card. It
depends upon the circumstance that if you hold a small
object close to a lens a shadow of it may be cast right
through the lens without being turned upside down.
Here is a lens — it will form inverted images of objects
if it focuses them on a screen. But hold a small object
close to the lens (Fig. 29) and shine light through it ; the
shadows are actually cast right side up on the screen.
Now take a visiting-card and prick
a pinhole through it with a large-
sized pin. Place this hole about
an inch from the eye and look
through it at a white cloud or a
white surface strongly illuminated.
Then hold the pin upright, as in
Fig. 30, between the eye and the
pinhole. It may require a little
patience to see it, as the pin must
be held exactly in the right place.
You know you are holding it with the head up, yet you
see it with its head down, looking as in Fig. 31. Now
if in the case where you know that its shadow is
being thrown upright on the back of your eye you
feel the shadow upside down, it follows that when you
feel any image right way up it must really be an in-
verted image that you are feeling.
The other proof has the merit of being direct and
objective, but does not succeed with every eye — some
Fig. 29.
i LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 47
persons have the cartilaginous walls of the eyeballs too
thick. Stand in front of a mirror, close one eye —
say the right — and hold a candle in the hand on the
same side. Hold the candle about
at the level of the closed eye so that
its light just falls across the bridge
of the nose into the open eye.
Then if you look very carefully you
will see, right in the extreme corner
of the eye, shining dimly through
the cartilaginous white wall, a small ^^'^' 2^-
image of the candle flame — and it is inverted. If you
48 LIGHT LECT.
raise the candle higher, the image goes down ; if you
lower the candle, the image rises.
Leaving lenses let me show you a couple of
interesting experiments depending on the property of
refraction that we have been discussing. In passing
through the earth's atmosphere obliquely, as they do
when the sun is low down near the horizon, the sun's
rays are refracted, and he seems to be a little higher up
in the sky than he really is. Indeed, under certain
circumstances, the sun can be seen above the horizon
at a time when it is absolutely certain that he has really
set ; his rays in that case come in a curved path over
the intervening portion of the globe. Now the circum-
stances in which this can occur are these — that the
successive strata of the air must be of different
densities ; the densest below, next the earth, and the
less dense above. To demonstrate this I will take a
glass tank into which there have been carefully poured
a number of solutions of chloride of calcium in water of
different densities — the
densest at the bottom.
You note that the beam
of light sent into the
' ^ ' trough takes a curved
path (Fig. 32). In fact, the light turns round a corner.
The difference of refractivity that accompanies
difference of density is well shown by a very simple
experiment upon heated air. You all know that when
air is heated it rises, becoming less dense. You all
know that, when cooled, air becomes more dense, and
tends to fall. But did you ever see the hot air rising
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
49
from your hand, or even from a hot poker? Or did
you ever see the cold air descending below a lump of
ice? This is exceedingly easy to show you. All I
require is a very small luminous point. We will take
the light of an arc-lamp, shining through a small hole
in a metal diaphragm close to it, and let it shine on the
white wall. Now I let this hot poker cast its shadow
on the screen, and you see torrents of hot air, which
rising, cast their shadows also. Here is a lump of ice.
The cold air streaming down from it casts its shadow.
Even from my hand you see the hot air rising. A
candle flame casts quite a dense shadow, and when I
open a bottle of ether you see the ether vapour — which
is ordinarily quite invisible — streaming out of the neck
and falling down. Even a jet of escaping gas reveals
itself when examined by this method.
Another curious experiment consists in using as a
lens a piece of glass which has been ground so as to be
curved only one way — say right and left — but not
curved in the other way. If this
lens is thicker in the middle part
from top to bottom, as in Fig. 33,
than it is at the two edges, it will
magnify things from right to left,
but not from top to bottom; hence
• Fig 'X'x
It produces a distortion. I throw
upon the screen the portrait of a well-known old gentle-
man. Then if I interpose in front of him one of these
"cylindrical " lenses, his face will be distorted. And if I
then turn the lens round the distortion will alternately
elongate his features and broaden them. There are
E
50 LIGHT LECT.
also cylindrical lenses of another kind, thinner in the
middle than at the edges. These produce a distortion
by minifying.
Finally, I return to the point which I endeavoured
to explain to you a few minutes ago, that all that any
lens or mirror can do is to impress a curvature upon the
wave-fronts of the waves.
The most striking proof of this is afforded by that
now rare curiosity the magic mirror of Japan. In old
Japan, before it was invaded and degraded by Western
customs, many things were different from what they
now are. The Japs never sat on chairs — there were
none to sit upon. They had no looking-glasses — their
mirrors were all of polished bronze ; and, indeed, those
interesting folk had carried the art of bronze-casting and
of mirror polishing to a pitch never reached in any
other nation before them. The young ladies in Japan
when they were going to do up their hair used to squat
down on a beautiful mat before a lovely mirror standing
on an elegant lacquered frame. Fig. 34 is photographed
from a fine Japanese drawing in my possession. You
may have seen pretty little Yum-yum in the "Mikado"
squat down exactly so before her toilet-table. Here (Fig.
35) is one of these beautiful Japanese mirrors, round,
heavy, and furnished with a metal handle. One face
has been polished with care and hard labour ; the other
has upon it in relief the ornament cast in the mould — in
this case the crest of the imperial family, the kiri leaf
(the leaf of the Paullonia imperialis) with the flower-buds
appearing over it. The polished face is very slightly
convex ; but on looking into it none of you young
A
Fig. 34 —Japanese Girls with Mirrors-
>.
^
,_^
a
,
is
X/***j*^ '
112 LIGHT LECT.
ether-waves. When any one particle gets a sudden jolt
it quivers, and gives out a vibration, which we may
represent by the curve (Fig.
68), with a lot of little wave-
lets each like its fellow, per-
haps several thousands ^ of
them before they die away.
^^°" ^^' Each such vibration would
die away like the note of a piano -string struck and
left to itself. But perhaps before the motion has died
away another jolt sets it off vibrating in a new direc-
tion, again to die away. Suppose millions of these
little particles, all jostling, and vibrating, and sending
out trains of wavelets. It is clear that one ought to
expect the utmost admixture of wave-sizes and directions
of vibration in the resultant light.
Then, you understand, that as natural light is not
polarised in any particular direction, if we want to get
polarised light we must do something to it to polarise it.
But how ?
^ According to the researches of Fizeau, at least 50,000, on the
average, in ordinary light. Prof. Michelson's more recent experi-
ments, in which he has obtained interference between two waves
the paths of which differed by more than 20 cm. or 1,000,000 wave-
lengths, prove that the average number of wavelets in each train
must be reckoned in millions.
[Table
in
POLARISATION OF LIGHT
113
Table III. — Polarisers
Principle.
Nature of Apparatus.
Reference.
By Reflexion . . -j
By Refraction . <
By Double Refraction <
By Double Refraction, \
with Absorption . /
By Double Refraction, \
with Internal Reflexion j
I.
IL
in.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Black glass at about 57°
Delezenne's Polariser .
Glass sheet at about 57°
Bundle of thin glass
sheets set obliquely
Rhomb of Iceland Spar
Double-image Prism .
Slice of Tourmaline .
Nicol's Prism and its
modei'n Varieties
(p. 153)-
(p. 123)-
(P- 154)-
(p. 154).
(p. 120).
(p. 125).
(p. 119).
(p. 121).
In Table IIL I have set down some eight different
ways of polarising, which we will presently consider in
their order. But before we deal with any of them, let
us go back to the vibrations of cords and see how they
can be polarised.
Here (Fig. 69) is an indiarubber cord passing through
a wooden box with vertical partitions. These partitions
limit the movements and only allow vertical vibrations
to pass through. If I vibrate the cord in any way, it is
only the vertical components of the vibration that suc-
ceed in getting through. The waves, after passing
through the box, come out polarised in a vertical plane.
If I turn the box over on its side (Fig. 70) it will now
transmit only horizontal components of vibration. What
will happen, then, if I pass the cord through a second
box, as in Fig, 70 ? That depends on the positions of
the boxes. If the first one P is set with its partitions
114
LIGHT
LECT.
vertical, it will polarise the waves vertically, and as these
waves travel on they will come to the second box marked
Ill POLARISATION OF LIGHT 115
A. If this also has its partitions vertical, the vertical
waves will get through it also. If both boxes are turned
over on their side, then the first one will polarise the
waves horizontally, and the horizontally polarised waves
will pass through both boxes. But if I have the first box
P set vertically and the second box A horizontally (Fig.
71), P will polarise the vibrations so that they will not
get through A, but will be cut off. However P is
placed it will polarise the waves ; if A is turned so as
to cross the waves they will be cut off.
Upon the lecture table is another model which illus-
trates the same set of facts more fully. If you under-
stand it you will have no difficulty in understanding the
optical apparatus that we are going to use. In this
apparatus the vibrations of a thin silk cord — best seen
by those in front of the table — are produced by attach-
ing one end to the prong of a tuning-fork, the vibrations
of which are maintained by an electromagnetic attach-
ment. To the distant end of the cord is attached a small
weight, which has been so adjusted that the cord is thrown
into stationary waves. In brief, the vibrations of the cord
are tuned to those of the fork. To polarise the vibrations,
the motions of the cord are confined by means of a pair
of glass plates mounted in wooden cylinders (Figs. 72,
73). At the first nodal point of the cord the first pair
of glass plates acts as a polariser, P ; the cord beyond
that point vibrating in the plane thus imposed upon it.
A pointer fixed upon the wooden cylinder shows the
direction of the plane of polarisation.^ The second
^ Concerning the term, "plane of polarisation," see remarks in
Appendix to this Lecture, p. 158.
ii6
LIGHT
LECT.
0."=
^^m
pair of glass plates is set at the second nodal point
to act as an analyser^ A. The vibrations of the cord
Ill POLARISATION OF LIGHT 117
are made vertical by the polariser P, and when the
plane of the analyser A is also vertical (as in Fig. 72)
the vibrations which pass through the polariser pass
through the analyser also. But, if (as in the previous
experiment with the boxes) the analyser is turned round
a quarter, so that the slit between the glass plates lies
across the vibrations (as in Fig. 73) the vibrations are
no longer transmitted. To recapitulate, the vibrations
are tra?ismitted when the polariser and analyser are
parallel to one another : but are cut off and extinguished
when polariser and analyser are crossed. Hence, by
turning round the analyser to such a position that it
cuts off the vibrations we can ascertain with accuracy ^
the direction of the vibrations proceeding from the
polariser.
But why should we linger longer upon mere models
when we can operate with light - waves themselves ?
My assistant throws upon the screen a beam of white
light from the electric lamp within the optical lantern.
He now places in the path of the beam a large polariser,
P (Fig. 74). What this polariser is, I will presently
explain. He now sets it so that it polarises the light,
allowing to fall upon the screen those waves only whose
vibrations are executed in a vertical plane. The white
disk of light on the screen consists, in fact, of up-and-
down light only. Your eye would not tell you whether
the light was vibrating up and down, or even that it was
^ The model will enable the orientation of the plane of the vibra-
tions to be determined to within about half a degree of angle. That
is, if the analyser is as much as half a degree out of the crossed
position, the vibrations are not completely extinguished.
ii8
LIGHT
LECT.
polarised at all. To ascertain that the waves are really
polarised we must have recourse to an analyser. This
analyser, A, is itself simply a smaller polariser. In
order that you may see it the better it is mounted
(see Fig. 75) by thin strings upon a ring - support,
the shadow of which you see on the screen. If this
is also set in the proper position to transmit up-and-
down vibrations, the polarised light will come through
Fig. 74.
it, both polariser and analyser being clear as glass. If
now the analyser A is turned round one quarter it will,
though clear as glass, entirely cut off the up-and-down
vibrations, with the result (Fig. 76) that no light gets
through it. This cutting off of the light by turning
the analyser one quarter round proves that the light was
polarised. When the planes of polariser and analyser
are parallel to one another — both vertical, or both
horizontal, — then we have the "bright field" of trans-
mitted light. When the planes of polariser and analyser
Ill
POLARISATION OF LIGHT
119
then
are crossed — one vertical, the other horizontal
the light is cut off, and we have the "dark field."
There is a gem called the tourmaline which, when
cut into thin slices, has the property of polarising light.
This gem^ is often found of a dark green colour, but
also of brown, dark blue, and even ruby tint. Into the
beam of ordinary white light now cast upon the screen
Fig. 75.
Fig. 76.
there is now introduced a thin slice of brown tourmaline
(Fig. 77). It looks dark, for it cuts off more than half
the light. But such light as succeeds in getting through
is polarised — the vibrations being parallel to the longer
dimension of the slice. A second thin slice of tourmaline
is now introduced, and superposed over the first. When
they are parallel to one another light comes through
both of them (Fig. 78). But if one of them is now
^ The dark green tourmaline is also sometimes called the Brazilian
emerald, though it is of entirely different composition from an
emerald. The bishops of the South American Catholic churches
wear tourmalines in their episcopal rings, instead of emeralds.
I20
LIGHT
LECT.
turned round, so that they are crossed, as in Fig. 79, no
light can get through the crossed crystals. The one cuts
off all horizontal vibrations and horizontal components
of vibration, the other cuts off all vertical vibrations and
vertical components of vibration. Hence, when crossed,
they produce a "dark field." One acts as polariser, the
other as analyser.
Let us return to the big polariser (Fig. 74) which we
used in the previous experiment, and which was as clear
as glass. It is made of Iceland spar, a natural crystal,
Fig.
n-
Fig. 78.
Fig. 79.
which once w^as common but now is rare and expensive.
As imported from the mine in Iceland this spar possesses
the peculiar property known as " double refraction " :
when you look through it you see everything double.
Here is a fine specimen mounted in a tube. Look at
your finger through it j you will see two fingers. It is a
substance which splits the waves of light into two parts,
giving two images ; and, moreover, polarises the light in
the act of splitting it, so that each part is polarised.
We do not, however, want both images ; .we want only
one. What do we do ? We adopt the method proposed
eighty years ago by William Nicol, a celebrated Scotch
Ill
POLARISATION OF LIGHT
121
philosopher, and construct out of a crystal of the spar
a "polarising prism," or Nicol prism. Here are several
Pircction
vs>» >
of Light
Direction
»>» >/-
of Light
Fig. 8o.
Nicol prisms of various sizes ; and also several modern
modifications ^ of the Nicol prism. Here also is a large
wooden model to illustrate Nicol's method.
^ In Foucault's modification, a film of air is interposed between
the two wedges of crystal. In Hartnack's prism a film of linseed
oil is interposed, and the ends of the wedges are squared off. I have
myself from time to time suggested several modifications which are
Fig. 8i
improvements upon the original Nicol prism. In one of these, the
natural end- faces of the prism are sliced away parallel to the
crystallographic axis so as to leave terminal faces that are " principal
planes" (Fig. 8i), and the crystal is then sliced with an oblique cut
122
LIGHT
LECT.
Selecting a piece of Iceland spar of suitable propor-
tions we slice it across (with a piece of copper wire,
used as a saw, and some emery powder) in an oblique
direction from one of its two blunt corners to the other ;
polish the surfaces, thus dividing the prism into two
wedges. These are then cemented together again
with Canada balsam (a resinous cement) ; and the
polarising prism is complete. Its operation upon light
is as follows. When the waves enter through one end-
face they are split into two parts which take slightly
different directions, and strike at different angles upon
the film of balsam. As a consequence one of the two
beams when it meets the film of balsam is reflected
off sideways, as from an oblique mirror, while the
other goes through the prism and emerges at the other
end-face. Consequently only one of the two beams
gets through the prism, the other being suppressed or
reflected out of the way. Prisms made in Nicol's way
that is also a principal plane, and these wedges are then reunited
with Canada balsam or linseed oil. In a
cheaper modification — a "reversed Nicol"
— the natural end-faces are cut off (Fig.
82) so as to reverse the shape, and the
oblique cut is then made along a re-
versed diagonal and is nearly in a
"principal plane." In a third modifica-
tion the end-faces are first trimmed off
obliquely as principal planes of section
through one of the natural edges of the
end -face; an oblique cut is then given
(as in Fig. 83) between two of the
terminal arretes, from FM to GN, and the two pieces are then
transposed ; and they are finally reunited by balsam along two of
their natural faces.
in
POLARISATION OF LIGHT
123
Fig. 84.
have usually oblique end-faces of diamond shape. The
vibrations which pass through are those
executed in the direction parallel to the
shorter diagonal (Fig. 84) ; while those
which are suppressed are those parallel to
the longer diagonal. The large polariser
used in front of the lantern (Fig. 74, p. 118) is simply
a large Nicol prism. ^
^ In consequence of the dearth of spar, large Nicol prisms can
only be procured at extravagant prices. In 1888 Mr. Ahrens con-
structed for me a large reflecting polariser, having a clear aperture
of 2| inches. For projection purposes it is quite equal to a Nicol
prism of equal aperture, and is much less costly. In this reflecting
polariser, which is constructed on a principle suggested by Delezenne,
the light is first turned to the proper polarising angle (about 57°) by
a large total-reflexion prism of glass cut to a special shape. It is
then reflected back parallel to its original path by impinging upon
a mirror of black glass covered by a single sheet of the thinnest
patent plate glass to increase
the intensity of the light.
Fig. 85 shows the design of
this prism. Compared with
a large Nicol prism it has
one disadvantage : it cannot
be conveniently rotated, so
that it polarises the light in
a fixed plane. To obviate
this defect, I devised an
"optical rotator" to place
on the end of the prism.
This consists simply of two
plates, l • • Fl*^' ^5^-
constituting ordinary light ims is
but a gross and rough illustration of Stokes's hypo-
thesis ; but it must suffice for the present.
But I cannot close this course of lectures without
one word as to the possibilities which this amazing dis-
covery of the Rontgen light has opened out to science.
It is clear that there are more things in heaven and
earth than are sometimes admitted to exist. There are
sounds that our ears have never heard : there is light
that our eyes will never see. And yet of these inaudible,
invisible things discoveries are made from time to time
by the patient labours of the pioneers in science. You
have seen how no scientific discovery ever stands alone :
it is based on those that went before. Behind Rontgen
stands Lenard; behind Lenard, Crookes; behind
Crookes the line of explorers from Boyle and Hauksbee
and Otto von Guericke downwards. We have had
Crookes 's tubes in use since 1878, and therefore for
nearly twenty years Rontgen' s rays have been in exist-
276 LIGHT LECT. VI
ence, though no one, until Rontgen observed them on
8th November, 1895, even suspected^ their presence
or surmised their qualities. And just as these rays
remained for twenty years undiscovered, so even now
there exist, beyond doubt, in the universe, other rays,
other vibrations, of which we have as yet no cognisance.
Yet, as year after year rolls by, one discovery leads to
another. The seemingly useless or trivial observation
made by one worker leads on to a useful observation by
another; and so science advances, ^'creeping on from
point to point." And so steadily year by year the sum
total of our knowledge increases, and our ignorance is
rolled a little further and further back ; and where now
there is darkness, there will be light.
^ It is but fair to Professor Eilhard Wiedemann to mention that
in August i8g5 he described some " discharge-rays " (Entladungs-
strahlen) inside a vacuum tube, which, though photographically
active, refused to pass through fluor-spar, and were incapable of
being deflected by a magnet. But their properties differ from
Rontgen rays in some other respects.
APPENDIX TO LECTURE VI
OTHER KINDS OF INVISIBLE LIGHT
Upon the discovery by Rontgen of the rays that bear his
name it was natural that the inquiry should be raised whether
there exist any other rays having penetrative properties in
any degree similar, Lenard's rays, discovered in 1894, to
which some reference is made on p. 258 above, have the
power of penetrating thin sheets of metal and of producing
photographic action as well as of discharging electrified
bodies. But they differ from Rontgen's rays in their pene-
trative power, for air is relatively opaque to them. Also
they are deflected in varying degrees by the magnet.
Wiedemann's " discharge-rays," briefly mentioned above,
are further described on p. 281.
Many persons have supposed Rontgen's rays to be
produced by electric sparks in the open air, simply because
such sparks will fog photographic plates and cause images
of coins and other metal objects in contact with the plates
to impress images upon them. These images are, however,
due to direct electric action. They are not produced when
a sheet of aluminium is so interposed as to screen off all
direct electrical action.
In sunlight there do not appear to be any Rontgen rays,
nor yet in the hght of the electric arc ; for neither of these
sources contains any rays that will affect a photographic
plate that is protected by an aluminium sheet.
There are, however, some kinds of light that, like Ront-
gen's rays, will pass through aluminium or through black
278 LIGHT LECT. VI
cardboard, and produce photographic effects. These are
worthy of some notice.
BecquereVs Rays. — Early in 1896 M. Henri Becquerel,
as mentioned on p. 272, and the author of this book in-
dependently, made the observation that some invisible radia-
tions are emitted from some of the salts of the metal
uranium, as, for example, the nitrate of uranyl and the
fluoride of uranium and ammonium. These and other salts
of uranium, whether in the dark or in the light, emit a sort
of invisible light, which can pass through aluminium and
produce on a photographic plate shadows of interposed
metal objects.
PhospJwrus Light. — The author has examined the pene-
trative effect of some other kinds of light. The pale light
emitted by phosphorus when oxidising in moist air is
accompanied by some invisible rays which will penetrate
through black paper or celluloid, but will not pass through
aluminium. So will some invisible rays that are emitted by
the flame of bisulphide of carbon.
Light of Glow-worms and Fireflies. — Dr. Dawson
Turner has found that the light emitted by glow-worms
contains photographic rays which will pass through alu-
minium.
In Japan, Dr. Muraoka has examined the rays emitted
by a firefly (" Johanniskafer "). He found that they emitted
rays which, after filtration through card or through copper
plates, would act photographically. These rays can be
reflected, and probably refracted and polarised. He used
about 1000 fireflies shut up in a shallow box over the
screened photographic plate.
IViedejnami's Rays. — Professor E. Wiedemann in 1891
described some rays (named by him Discharge-rays, or
E7itladiiiigsstrahle?i) which are produced in vacuum-tubes
by the influence of a rapidly-alternating electric discharge. '
They have the property of exciting in certain chemically
prepared substances, notably in calcium sulphate containing
a small percentage of manganese sulphate, the power of
thermo-luminescence. In other words, the substance after
exposure to these rays will emit light when subsequently
APP. OTHER KINDS OF INVISIBLE LIGHT 279
warmed. They are emitted at lower degrees of rarefaction
than are necessary for producing the kathode rays. They
are emitted from all parts of the path of the spark-discharge,
but more strongly near the kathode. They are propagated
in straight lines, but no reflexion of them by solid bodies
has yet been observed. They are readily absorbed by
certain gases, oxygen and carbonic dioxide, but their
production is promoted by hydrogen and nitrogen. Those
produced in hydrogen are partially transmitted by quartz
and fluor-spar. They are apparently not present in the
glow discharge. In vacuo these rays are produced by all
parts of the discharge. Under the influence of electric
oscillations they are emitted, even in some cases at half an
atmosphere of pressure, at the boundary of the rarefied gas
and the glass wall, even before any visible light is seen.
No deviation of them by the magnet has yet been observ-
able/ Those produced at relatively great pressures have in
general the power of penetrating bodies according to the
inverse ratio of their densities.
New kinds of Kathode Rays. — The author in 1896
found three new kinds of kathode rays. One of these,
termed parakathodic rays, is produced when ordinary
kathode rays strike upon an anti-kathode, as in the " focus "
tubes. If the vacuum is low, there are emitted from the anti-
kathode, in nearly equal intensity in all directions, some
rays that closely resemble ordinary kathode rays. They can
be deflected electrostatically and magnetically, and can cast
shadows of objects on the glass walls. If the vacuum is
high enough for the production of Rontgen's rays, some
parakathodic rays are also produced at the same time.
They cause the glass bulb to fluoresce over an obliquely
limited region as in Fig. 142, p. 265.
The second kind, termed diakathodic rays, is produced
by directing the ordinary kathode rays full upon a piece of
wire-gauze, or upon a spiral of wire which is itself negatively
electrifled. The ordinary kathode rays refuse to pass through
the meshes of the gauze, but instead there passes through
a beam of bluish rays, which differ from kathode rays in that
they are not directly affected by a magnet. These diakathodic
28o LIGHT LECT. VI
rays can also produce fluorescence of the glass where they
meet the walls of the tube, and can cast shadows of inter-
venmg objects ; but the fluorescence is of a different kind,
for ordinary soda glass gives a dark orange fluorescence
instead of its usual golden green tint. This orange fluor-
escence when examined by the spectroscope shows the
D-lines characteristic of sodium.
A third kind, termed isokathodic rays, are formed by
passing ordinary kathode rays along a vacuum tube
in which the discharge travels successively through a
number of small glass funnels, and is subjected at the same
time to a transverse magnetic field. After passing through
several of these the rays change their character so that
they no longer cause fluorescence of the glass wall of the
tube, and are no longer ordinary kathode rays.
Goldstein^ s Rays. — ^Herr Goldstein has also described
some rays apparently closely akin to the diakathodic rays.
If a perforated disk is used as a kathode there are produced
some blue rays which stream back behind the kathode
opposite the apertures. He calls these Canal-rays,
LECTURE VII
RADIUM AND ITS RAYS
Emission by certain substances of radiations that will penetrate
opaque screens — Properties of uranium salts — The Becquerel
rays — Radio-activity — Examination by electroscope — Researches
of the Curies — Madame Curie discovers polonhim and radium
in pitchblende — Experiments with radium — Separation by
magnetic field of the three kinds of rays emitted by radium —
Strutt's radium clock — Crookes's spinthariscope — Researches
of P. Curie on heat emitted by radium, and of Rutherford on
disintegration of radium atom.
Early in the year 1896, when all the scientific world
was astir over the then newly discovered Rontgen rays,
and the omniscient journalists were writing rubbish about
the "new photography," many a quiet worker was trying
over again the wonderful experiments by which Rontgen
had enabled us to see, by their shadows cast on a
fluorescent screen, the forms of hidden things. Let me
recapitulate briefly the sum and substance of Rontgen's
discovery. It had been known for many years that the
substances which are fluorescent — in particular the
crystalline powder called barium platinocyanide — shine
in the dark when there fall upon them the invisible waves
of ultra-violet light. Rontgen, using a Crookes' tube
X
282 LIGHT LECT.
excited by internal electric discharges from an induction
coil, had found that from the antikathode of the tube
there was emitted an invisible radiation — a new kind of
rays — which resembled ultra-violet light in possessing the
power of exciting fluorescence, but which differed from
ultra-violet light, and indeed from every known kind of
radiation, in being able to penetrate through black card-
board, wood, and even through thin sheets of metals
that are quite opaque to everything else. He was thus
able to cast upon a fluorescent screen the shadows of
the bones within the hand, or of the coins inside a purse.
Now every student of physics knows of the principle
of reversibility ; the principle which has led to so many
discoveries of converse phenomena. Chemical combina-
tion can create an electric current : the electric current
can in turn produce chemical decomposition. An electric
current can be used to magnetize a magnet : therefore,^
argued Faraday, it ought to be possible to generate an
electric current by means of a magnet — and the idea led
him to discover the principle of the dynamo. The cir-
cumstance that invisible rays when falling on a fluorescent
substance can make it shine in the dark naturally raised
the speculation whether it were not possible to make
a fluorescent body emit these invisible rays. The
possibility of reversing Rontgen's discovery must have
occurred to many minds. To two scientific workers, one
in London, one in Paris, this thought came with sufficient
force to cause them to make experiments to try whether
this possibility could be realized.
On February i6, 1896, I covered up a photographic
dry-plate in an opaque envelope of thin black paper, and
VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 283
laying it face upwards on a window-sill, I laid upon it a
number of patches of substances known to be fluorescent
or phosphorescent, fluor spar, sulphides of the alkaline
earths, nitrate of uranium, bits of uranium glass, quinine,
and some platinocyanides. Other plates were prepared,
some of them having metal foil above the sensitive plate,
and different materials were placed above them in various
dispositions. After they had been given time to act, the
photographic plates were to be developed in the dark-
room. If after development they showed any markings
in the parts where the fluorescent substances had been
laid, this would have been prima facie evidence that the
fluorescent body did emit some sort of radiation akin to
the Rontgen rays.
On the 27 th of February the plates were developed.
The plate on which the miscellaneous collection of sub-
stances had been exposed through black paper showed,
to my great joy, a number of darkened patches, proving
that some of them had indeed emitted a radiation of a
highly penetrating character.
The scientific consequences of a discovery of this kind
are so important that they cannot be published without
further corroboration or criticism. The result seemed
to contradict the law laid down by Sir George Stokes for
fluorescence many years before, that in any transformation
of rays there is always a degradation of the wave-length
to a slower frequency, whereas this seemed to be a
transformation to a higher kind. So at once I wrote to
Sir George Stokes to apprise him of my observations,
and to ask his opinion. Meantime I developed some of
the other plates and found that some of them showed
284 LIGHT LECT.
traces of action ; others none. None of the sulphides of
alkaUne earths or the platinpcyanides showed anything
through metal foil. In fact the only one that showed
anything through metal foil was a plate on which there
had been placed a number of crystalline fragments of
nitrate of uranium arranged in a circle over a sheet of
aluminium foil. Fig 159 is a reproduction of the identical
photograph obtained on February 27, 1896.
Then came Stokes's reply followed by a second letter.
He was most encouraging in saying that for some years
he had known observations that were exceptions to the law
he had laid down. But his second letter contained the
ominous remark: "I fear you have already been anticipated.
See Becquerel, Comptes rendus for Feb. 24, p. 420." And,
sure enough, there was announced in black and white the
discovery of the very same phenomenon by M. Henri
Becquerel, the third of the famous scientific dynasty of
Becquerels whose names are associated imperishably with
electricity and optics. He had found that crystals of the
double sulphate of uranium and potassium would act on
a photographic plate wrapped in black paper, and would
even traverse thin sheets of glass, aluminium, or copper.
The Becquerel rays — for, by the wholesome rule
established by Faraday, priority falls to him who first
publishes a discovery — are then a species of ray or emana-
tion which like the Rontgen rays can act on a photographic
plate, and can pass through opaque substances. During
the next few weeks I sought, as I had sought in the case
of Rontgen rays, to ascertain by experiment whether these
rays from uranium compounds could be polarized, or
refracted. To avoid all dogmatizing as to their nature
Fig. 159.— Photographic Plate acted on by Fragments of
Uranium Nitrate. Obtained by the Author, February
27, 1896.
Fig. i6o. — Henrt Becquerei., Discoverer of the
Becquerel Rays.
VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 285
I spoke of the phenomenon as hyperfiuorescence. M.
Becquerel, who had apparently set out from much the
same standpoint of searching for a possible inverse rela-
tion between fluorescence and radiation, announced that
the rays discovered by him could not only penetrate
opaque substances, but could be reflected and refracted,
whilst I could not find any such effects. In the course
of the next few months he had pushed his investigations
much farther, and had established several facts. These
rays were independent of any fluorescence, and were
emitted by all the various salts of uranium. They were
continuously emitted, without appreciable diminution,
month after month. The emitting substance required no
stimulus such as subjection to light, or to heat : indeed
its emission of the rays appeared to be altogether inde-
pendent of temperature or any other physical conditions.
Further, and of utmost importance, it was observed that
these new rays possessed the power of causing the dis-
charge of electrified bodies, situated at a distance, across
the intervening air. Brought near to a charged gold leaf
electroscope the leaves gradually collapsed, the rate at
which the discharge proceeded being a measure of the
efficiency of the specimen in emitting these rays. This
furnished a second and quantitative method of study,
which proved in the sequel most invaluable. In the first
place it enabled M. Becquerel to ascertain that metallic
uranium was about two and a half times as active as the
double sulphate of uranium and potassium at first used.
Then it was found that the air plays a distinct part in
the effect, and that a sphere of electrified uranium though
it spontaneously discharges itself in the air does not
286
LIGHT
LECT.
discharge itself in vacuo. Also that the air acted -upon
by uranium or its salts behaves just like air which has
been exposed to Rontgen rays, being more or less
ionized thereby. These results led M. Becquerel to
regard this property of emitting these radiations as a
specific atomic property of the metal uranium, and he
described the property itself by the name of radio-activity.
As soon as the radio-activity of uranium and its salts
became an established fact there
arose a search for other materials
which might possibly be radio-
active.
The fundamental experi-
ment is very easily demon-
strated. A convenient form of
electroscope is that depicted
in Fig 1 6 1. From a highly-
insulating support of fused
quartz or of amber there hangs,
Fig. i6i.— Electroscope suitable on a short metal stcui, a single
for Observation of Radio- . . , . .
Activity. gold leaf or a leai of alummmm,
beside a stiff metal strip. To
charge the apparatus a short crooked brass wire which
passes through the top of the apparatus is turned until
its lower end touches the stem of the electroscope, and
so a charge given to the crooked wire is conveyed to
the gold leaf, which instantly stands out at an angle
from the stiff strip by mutual repulsion. The crooked
wire is then turned away out of contact with the strip,
leaving the electroscope charged. Now if one brings
near to the electroscope a bottle containing a few frag-
VII
RADIUM AND ITS RAYS
287
ments of metallic uranium, the gold leaf is seen gently to
fall down toward the vertical position. The time
required for the deflexion of the leaf to be reduced to
half its initial value is, caeteris paribus^ a measure of the
discharging influence of the active substance.
Another and more accurate method of procedure is
to the
Electrometer
Bt
Layer of Radioactive Stuff
r\\
Battery_
'of Cell's
^\W^W^
» Switch
^
m
Fig. 162. — Madame Curie's Apparatus for detecting Radio- Activity.
shown by the arrangement of apparatus depicted in Fig.
162.
In this apparatus two metal plates are arrayed
parallel to one another. One of them can be highly
electrified by means of a battery consisting of a large
number of small accumulators, while the other is joined
by a wire to an electrometer, and by a switch to earth.
There is, therefore, an electric field between A and B,
the intensity of which can be varied by varying the
number of cells in the battery. If now the lower plate
is covered with a layer of some uranium compound (or
other active substance), the radiations which it emits
288
LIGHT
LECT.
cause the air above it to become conductive, and an
actual electric current, weak indeed, but sufficient to be
measured, passes across from the lower to the upper
plate ; the strength of this current depending on the
electromotive force of the battery, the amount of surface
of the plates, and the intensity of the activity of the
substance laid on the lower plate. So long as the switch
is closed so that plate A and the electrometer are put to
earth, nothing is observed. But on opening the switch
so as to insulate the electrometer, it is observed to
become charged, and the rate at which its index is
deflected is proportional to the current to be observed.
With this delicate means of observation, made still more
accurate by a method of balancing the deflexion, devised
by the late M. Pierre Curie, Madame Curie investigated
the various compounds of uranium, and minerals con-
taining uranium and thorium. The relative results were
as follow : —
Metallic uranium
. 2-3
Green oxide of uranium .
. 1-8
Nitrate of uranium .
. .07
Oxide of thorium
o-i to 1-4
Pitchblende from Joachimsthal .
. 7-0
Pitchblende from Cornwall
. 1-6
Orangite ....
2-0
Monazite . . . .
• 0-5
Carnotite ....
. 6-2
Chalcolite . , c . .
. 5-2
All the minerals which showed themselves active
contained either uranium or thorium ; but the surprising
fact appeared that some of them were more active than
pure uranium itself To clear up this anomaly Madame
VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 289
Curie prepared from pure nitrate of uranium and acid
phosphate of copper an artificial chalcolite which, how-
ever, showed only about 0*92, a figure about proportional
to the quantity of uranium in it. Thence it became
probable that since pitchblende and natural chalcoHte
showed so great an activity, it must be that they contain
also a small quantity of some much more highly active
substance different from either uranium or thorium.
Madame Curie and her husband therefore set to work
to extract, if possible, by processes of chemical analysis,
from the mineral pitchblende, the more active constituent,
the existence of which she had thus been led to suspect.
The research was extremely laborious ; for a large
quantity of pitchblende ore had to be first dissolved, and
all the various known constituents separated out by
precipitation and each result tested to find the presence
of the active substance. Two such substances were in
fact discovered. One which closely resembled bismuth
was found by Monsieur and Madame Curie and was
called polonium in honour of Madame Curie's native
land; the other, which was precipitated along with
barium, was separated by Madame Curie in collaboration
with M. Bremont and was called radium. Chemically
it resembled barium, from which it was finally separated
as chloride of radium by fractional crystallization, the
radium salt being slightly less soluble than that of
barium. A third active body was afterwards obtained
from pitchblende by M. Debierne and called actinium ;
it resembles thorium chemically.
Radium is now extracted from pitchblende, and
chiefly from the uranium residues of the pitchblende
290 LIGHT LECTo
mines at Joachimsthal in Bohemia. This mine has
been long worked for uranium, which is used in the
manufacture of canary-coloured glass. The mineral is
roasted with carbonate of soda, and the resulting mass is
treated with warm water and then with dilute sulphuric
acid. The solution contains the uranium. The insoluble
residues which contain the radio-active bodies used to bs
thrown away. Madame Curie obtained some tons of
these residues. They consist chiefly of sulphate of
lead, sulphate of lime, silica, alumina, and oxide of iron,
accompanied by small quantities of many other metals.
The process of extraction of the radium is tedious and
costly. One ton of residue yields from forty to fifty
pounds of crude sulphates, the activity of which is from
thirty to sixty times as great as that of metallic uranium.
Then begins the long process of fractionating the chlorides
or bromides to concentrate the least soluble part by '
crystallizing and redissolving many times. Each operation
reduces the quantity of material till at last a few grains
only remain, which may have, however, an activity a
million times greater than that of the original residue.
Radium is consequently very costly — in fact the most
costly substance known on earth. The price in 19 lo for
the purest radium bromide is about ;£i6 for one
milligramme. That is ^16,000 per gramme, or
;£"5, 25 7,600 per pound !
Pitchblende is also found in Cornwall. The Cornish
samples are less rich in radium than those from Bohemia,
but at the present price of the precious product the
Cornish ore should be well worth extracting. Several
mineral springs, such as the waters of Bath and those of
Fig. 163. — Madame Curie.
Fig. 164. — Righi's Skiagram.
Obtained by exposure to Radium Bromide.
VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 291
Buxton, are found to contain traces of radium. The
Hon. R. J. Strutt has indeed found that many soils and
rocks contain radio-active matter in small traces.
A small quantity of radium bromide, as large only as
a mustard seed, will suffice to show the characteristic
properties, so marvellously active it is. If a photographic
plate is covered with a sheet of aluminium foil, and
opaque metal objects are laid over it, then an exposure
for a few minutes to the radiations of radium will suffice
to produce on it the shadows of these objects. The
accompanying plate, Fig. 164, was thus produced by
Professor Righi, of Bologna, during a lecture. It is
easy similarly to show the radio-active properties of
thorium salts. If a piece of a common Welsbach mantle
(see p. 345 below) is flattened out and dried, and is then
laid down (in the dark) on an ordinary photographic
dry-plate and left there in the dark for a few days and
developed, a print will be found showing the structure of
the mantle.
The power of radium to ionize the air in its neigh-
bourhood is shown by its rendering the air conductive
as in the experiment illustrated in Fig. 162 ; but another
electrical experiment shows how it may facilitate the
passing of a spark between two metal conductors in air.
Let an ordinary small spark-coil be arranged with
wires from its secondary terminals SS to two spark-gaps
A and B, in parallel to one another. By adjusting the
brass balls at each of these gaps to equality it can be
arranged that the sparks shall pass equally frequently at
A or B. Now bring a small specimen of radium bromide
near either one. At once the sparks will disappear at
292
LIGHT
LECT.
Induction Coil
the other spark-gap, and will be redoubled at the spark-
gap that is near the radium.
When the Becquerel rays were first discovered the
question was keenly discussed whether they were the
same as Rontgen's rays or
not. Becquerel himself at
first thought that he had been
able to reflect, refract, and
polarize them, so that in spite
of their great penetrative power
they were essentially different.
But when other experimenters
Fig. 165. -Spark-gap Experiment, totally failed to find any trace
of these actions, the question
of similarity once more became important. Like the
Rontgen rays the Becquerel rays could be stopped,
absorbed, by using thick sheets of lead, though they"
would penetrate lighter metals, and thin sheets even
of lead. But the Rontgen rays differed amongst them-
selves. ■ Those generated in tubes that had been
carried to the highest degree of exhaustion (or "hard"
tubes) were more highly penetrative in their action
than those generated in less highly exhausted (or
" soft ") tubes. They were not deflected by a magnet as
the kathode streams were. Would the Becquerel rays
show similar peculiarities ? So soon as the isolation of
radium furnished a more powerful source of radio-activity
it became possible to answer such questions. The
Curies made careful experiments and showed that they
were not homogeneous, but consisted of several sorts with
distinct properties. A small quantity of radium salt was
VII
RADIUM AND ITS RAYS
293
placed in a hole bored into a small thick cylinder of
lead. From the mouth of the hole the rays of all sorts
emerged. Across the line of their path was directed a
very intense magnetic field. If the radium rays were
negatively electrified like the kathode rays they would
be deflected sideways. If they were positively electrified
like the parakathodic (or " canal ") rays they would be
Fig. 166. — Deflexion by a Magnetic Field of the Rays emitted by Radium.
deflected to the other side. If they were like Rontgen's
rays they would not be deflected at all
To test any such deflexion a photographic dry-plate
was placed parallel to, and just below, the emerging
stream of rays, and in a plane at right angles to the
magnetic field.
The experiment revealed a surprising fact. All three
kinds of rays were present. Fig. 166 shows the result.
Some rays were deflected slightly to the left at A and
Y
294 LIGHT LECT.
apparently unable to penetrate far into the air, and
the direction of their deflexion proved them to carry
positive charges of electricity. Others deflected to the
right, at B, showed beautifully curved trajectories, and
carried negative charges. A third series were shot out
almost straight, and carried no electric charges. Later
these three kinds of " rays " were denominated by
Professor Rutherford as a, ^, and 7 rays respectively.
CL. The aipha-r2iys resemble ca?tal-r^.ys, and are positive.
13. The beta-rsiys resemble kathode-xdcys^ and are negative.
y. The gamma-rdcy?> resemble Rontgen's rays or X-rays.
The a-rays have little penetrative power ; a sheet of
aluminium a few thousandths of an inch thick stops
them : they appear to consist of flights of single atoms
positively charged, moving at a high speed.
The ^-rays also behave like charged bodies ; but
they are negatively charged ; and their mass is much less
than that of ordinary atoms, being minute corpuscles —
— " electrons " — certainly not more than -y^^-q P^^^t as
heavy as hydrogen atoms.
The <
\)
800 ^K
'^
'• ^
^^\
y
-J
600
^.
y.
, •
104
4.00
./
^ c<
^-^..
200
^
r
^-'i
^"^o
100
^
^^--J
3-75 3-5 3-25 S'O 2-73 2-5 2-25 2-0
Efficiency in Watts per candle power
Fig. 194. — Curve of Relation between Efficiency and Life of Carbon
Filament Glow-lamps.
quickly disintegrates, and it breaks at the weakest point.
Fig. 194 gives, from the experience of the Robertson
Lamp Company, a diagram of the way in which, as we
raise the volts, we raise the efficiency, but also shorten
the life of the lamp. The life-factor may be conveniently
stated in the following form : —
Per Cent of Normal Voltage.
Percentage of Normal Life.
I03
100
JOI
80 -8
102
68-1
103
56-2
104
45-2
105
37-4
106
31-0
354 LTGHT lect.
Raising the voltage only 6 per cent reduces the average
life to less than one-third of the normal value.
New Kinds of Glow-lamps. — Several newer kinds of
glow-lamps are now in the market. A radical departure
was made some seven years ago, when Nernst proposed to
use a filament that looks like a thread of pipe-clay, but is
in reality made of zirconia and yttria, or similar materials
of special emissivity. Such a thread does not conduct
the electric-current unless first heated ; so the Nernst-
lamps. Fig. 195, contain a special heating device warmed
by the current itself, so that the filament lights up as soon
as it becomes conductive. Partly because of the specific
emissivity of the materials, also probably, in part, because
of the attainment of a higher temperature, the Nernst
filament works with a higher efficiency than the carbon
filament, requiring only about 2 to 2 J watts per candle.
The dominant wave-length of its light is 128 millionths-^
of a centimetre, which would correspond to a temperature
of 2300° (absolute), if it radiates as a black body does.
If the effect is due to a specific emissivity the actual
temperature may be lower.
More recently glow-lamps have been proposed having
metallic filaments. Platinum will not do for this purpose ;
its melting point (1775° C.) is too low. But the rare
metal osmium has been proposed by Auer von Welsbach,
tantalum by von Bolton and Feuerlein, zirconium by
Zerning, and tungsten by Kusel. The difficulty in pre-
paring fine wires, about -gJo inch thick, of these hard
and almost infusible metals is great but not insur-
mountable. Osmium-lamps have been on the market
since 1904, tantalum-lamps since the year 1905 only.
VIII
THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT
355
Tungsten -lamps came in only in 1906. Yet the
results have been most promising, and the tantalum-
lamp (Fig. 196) is already largely in use. With the
osmium-lamp the consumption of energy goes down to
176 watt per candle; with the tantalum-lamp to 1-5
Fig. 195. — Nernst Glow-lamp.
Fig. 196. — Tantalum-lamp.
watt per candle. The melting point of tantalum is
about 2520° or 2570° (absolute) ; hence the light is very
white. For the tungsten-lamp an efficiency of i candle
per watt is claimed. If this can be realized, the cost of
electric-lighting will be reduced to one-third of that of
our present carbon glow-lamps. Here, at least, is attain-
able a considerable economy in the manufacture of light.
356
LIGHT
LECT.
Since the delivery of this lecture tungsten-lamps have
been much developed. The leading sort is that put on
the market under the name of the " osram " lamp. The
metal tungsten is so ex-
cessively hard that it can-
not be drawn into wire
in the ordinary way. The
ingenuity of inventors has
therefore been exercised
in devising methods for
handling it, so that it can
be made into thin wires,
otherwise than by drawing
through dies. Fig. 197
represents an " osram "
lamp giving about 16
candle-power, and con--
suming only 17 watts. If
supplied at an electric pres-
sure of 105 volts, it takes
only about J of an ampere
of current, whereas a car-
bon glow-lamp of equal
brightness would take h an
ampere. Besides this, the
light is whiter than that of
a carbon glow-lamp, as the temperature of the tungsten
filament may be made higher. Moreover, metallic filament
lamps are less sensitive than carbon filament lamps to varia-
tions in the electric pressure. They are, however, rather
more fragile, owing to the extreme tenuity of the filament
Fig. 197. — An "Osram" Lamp with
Tungsten Filament.
VIII
THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT
357
New kinds of Arc -lamps. — Improvements in
electric arc-lamps are also to be noted. The ordinary
arc-lamp sheds its light mainly from the white-hot end
of the upper carbon rod ; but as the lower carbon comes
Fig. 198. — Curve of Distribution of Light of Ordinary Arc-lamp.
into the way, the maximum illumination is cast obliquely
downward, as the curve of distribution of light. Fig. 198,
shows. x\bout twelve years ago the fashion began of
enclosing the arc in a nearly air-tight inner globe. By
this device the rate of consumption of the carbon rods
was greatly reduced, thereby saving much of the cost
2 c
358
LIGHT
LECT.
and labour of renewals. But the loss in light by absorp-
tion due to the double globe was very considerable, and
the efficiency of the lamp reduced. More recently an
advance has been made in the introduction of impreg-
nated carbons. Salts of potash have long been known
to improve the quality of the light emitted ; and, more-
over, their introduction permits a wider separation of the
Fig. 199. — Curves of Distribution of Light of Arc-lamps.
carbons, so that the downward light is less intercepted.
Salts of strontium and calcium, particularly the fluoride
of calcium, are effective in increasing the quantity of light
emitted for a given consumption of energy. In these
cases the arc becomes a veritable flame of light, the
luminosity being mainly in the arc itself and no longer
in the incandescent tips. By using two inclined carbons
with arc deflected downward, an enormous increase in
light is obtained. The curves of Fig. 199 (due to Wed-
VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 359
ding) are instructive. That marked A is the distribution
curve of an ordinary "open" arc -lamp. When sur-
rounded by an interior globe as an " enclosed " arc, the
output is diminished to the value shown by B ; while,
when a " flaming " arc was produced, using only the same
amount of energy, the output of light was increased more
than fourfold, and the distribution curve takes the form
delineated in C. The introduction of salts of calcium
gives to the arc a fine orange hue, which appears to
possess special penetrative powers in a foggy atmosphere.
By the kindness of the Union Electric Company of
London, one of their " Excello " flaming arc-lamps is
here exhibited.
The Magnetite Arc-lamp. — The newest species of
arc-lamp is that of Dr. C. P. Steinmetz of Schenectady.
After careful study of incandescent materials, he selected
the oxide of iron, called juagnetife, for making the negative
electrode of the lamp. This material, mixed with the
oxide of chromium or of titanium, rammed into an iron
cartridge, is supported at the bottom of the lamp. The
upper or positive pole is a piece of solid copper. The
arc thus produced is an intensely white column of light
about I inch long. The copper pole is not consumed,
and the cartridge of magnetite is only slowly used up.
One feature of this lamp is that the maximum of the
light is thrown almost horizontally, so that it is admirably
adapted for the lighting of streets. This lamp, not being
yet in the market in this country, I am indebted to Dr.
Steinmetz for the specimen now shown. It is highly
efficient, giving about twice as much light as the ordinary
arc-lamp for equal consumption of energy. The spec-
36o LIGHT LECT.
trum of the light of the magnetite arc reveals the cause
of this high efficiency. It consists largely of brilliant
bands of light in the green and red regions ; in fact, it is
largely a gaseous spectrum.
The Electric Vapour-lamp. — The vapour of mer-
cury, traversed by an electric current, emits a brilliant
bluish-green light. Various lamps have been designed to
bring this into practical use. Of these the best known
is the Cooper-Hewitt. The British Westinghouse Com-
pany has kindly supplied two of these for this lecture.
-Posit we had
Negative lead-
Seal off
/ Condensing chamber
VaOLium tube
Platinum \ \/ron electrode '"^'""''y electrode
mire \ Platinum wire
Protective porcelain tip a j. 4- , ■ x-
'^ Protective porcelain tip
Fig. 200. — Cooper- Hewitt Mercury Vapour-lamp.
A glass tube, about i inch in diameter, and 3 or 4 feet
in length, according to the voltage of supply, is arranged
with suitable electrodes at the ends (Fig. 200), and con-
tains nothing else except mercury and mercury vapour.
To cause the current to flow it is sufficient to tilt the
lamp, causing the thread of mercury that is formed along
the bottom of the tube when horizontal to part. At once
the tube is filled with a soft but brilliant flood of green
light. It is found to be about the same efficiency as the
ordinary arc-lamp, giving about i'66 candle per watt,
and is therefore far above any of the glow-lamps in its
economy.
VIII
THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT
361
As already pointed out, it is the property of a vapour,
when incandescent, to throw its energy into a few
briUiant rays, producing in this case a predominance of
green and blue. The heat-rays are not absent : but there
is a higher proportion of luminous rays than would be
the case if the shining body were a solid. Vapour-lamps
may therefore be regarded as a step towards the lumin-
escence lamp of the future. If only one could devise a
plan of setting the atoms or electrons into vibration
without exciting the grosser vibrations of the molecules
the end would be attained, and the very freedom of the
molecules in the gaseous state seems to favour this
possibility. Yet in the phosphorescence of the fire-fly,
and in the luminescence produced by cathode discharges,
there appears to be a possibiHty of touching the atom
within the molecule, even in substances that are not
vapours.
Comparison of Electric - lamps. — The following
table exhibits in comparative form the efficiencies of the
Efficiencies of Electric-Lamps
Watts per
Candle
(horizontal).
Candles per
Watt.
Candles per
H.P.
Glow-lamp.
3' 3
0-3
246
Nernst-lamp
1-5
0-67
495
Osmium-lamp
1-5
o'6j
495
Tantalum-lamp .
I '4
07
532
Tungsten-lamp .
I'O
I"0
746
Arc-lamp .
0-67
1-5
IIIO
Vapour-lamp
0-6
1-66
1240
Magnetite-lamp .
0*25
4-0
2984
Flame Arc-lamp
0-17
5-8
4300
62 LIGHT LECT.
various kinds of electric lamps, and shows how great is
the advance made by the recent inventions. The great
economy of the flame arc is, however, not sustained
except for arcs of enormous power ; and a small lamp,
that is, one of from 5 to 20 candle-power, giving more
than I candle-power per watt, is a thing still awaiting
invention.
Cost of Manufacture of Light. — We come now to
the all- important question of the cost of the light as
manufactured in these different kinds of lamps. To
deal with this question we must adopt some figures for
the cost of the gas, the oil, and the electric-energy which
are respectively the supplies from which the light is
manufactured. Prices differ in different districts. Those
taken here for convenience are —
Gas (normal quality i6-candle gas at 5 cubic feet per
hour) taken at 2s. per 1000 cubic feet.
Paraffiit Oil (American kerosene, with flash-point at
110° F.) taken at 8d. per gallon.
Electric -Energy taken at 2-4d. per "unit" {i.e. per
kilowatt-hour).
One must also adopt a unit for quantity of light,
and for this we take the candle-hour^ meaning the total
quantity of light given out during i hour by a light of
I candle-power.
The following table gives a resume, according to
the measurements of Professor Wedding, translated into
British values, of a number of different sources of light
as measured by him. For these the figures of cost
given are calculated down into pence per candle-hour
VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGFIT 363
on the foregoing basis. In a city like York, where gas
costs IS. lod. instead of 2s. per 1000 cubic feet, the
cost of gas-lights will be reduced correspondingly.
In London, where the price is 2s. 9d., they will be
correspondingly raised.
[Table
4-'
CI
t^
00_^
lO
^
f^
^
00^
o
VO
be
ct
cf
rc
rT
u-i
CO
cf
tC
xj-i
o"
rC
C
>.
CJ -c
HH
«N
p-1
'^
biO
C
8 §;? S2
M
'^
M
'^
M
VO
00
o
o
a H^ 3
00
p
C^
Ov
.^
ON
P
p
,"*
y~t
^
6
O
U
i^ ^ ri o
00
ro
'«
b
vb
On
ro
V
0)
b
>
M
^
N
'^
„
N
VO
00
o
o
(^
r^
o u~ h
OO
ro
»— 1
o
VO
ON
fO
'^
M
O
«4_;
W
Sal S
o
O
o
o
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
p
p
p
p
O
P
P
p
P
P
^-1
c
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
,
^
u-l
ON
00
hM
ON
>-o
N
o
00
o
o y
hH
cs
hH
00
ON
ro
cs
lO
t-H
00
o
o
o
o
rn
VO
00
ro
o
"t;
o
o
o
o
O
O
o
O
v5S
p
p
p
p
p
P
p
p
P
o
H
>
u
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
^
hi
z
^ i .
M
N
N
)-H
00
o
w
r^
o
ii->
N
ro
{-^
{^
OO
y
H ago
o
VO
m
r^
b
lO
LO
vb
ro
b
>Iq
E
"^
^
N
H-t
t— (
4j
(b
• O"^
ro
t-H
fe
rt
H
pq ^
o
ir^
O
1/2 . l;
lo
T^
VO
CO
»j->
VO
C/3
i iJ'S
M
yo
vp
.'^d-
r^
f^
HH
r'
fv)
O
00
r^
ro
LO
'-
N
-'
b
p^
•-N
.^
'^
ro
ro
hH
M
On
LO
m
o
o
ON
ro
VO
p<
j ,
o
en
<
U1
K
.^ ,
a
•
>-,
•
'JP
o ^
^
.^
6
M
o'
Oh
a,
ri
6
<
Flame
LECT. viii THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 365
If we cast our eye upon the column of figures headed
British Thermal Units per Candle -hour we find there
how vastly the different sorts of lamps differ in the
amounts of heat-energy which has to be supplied to
them to generate equal total amounts of light. While
the batswing gas-jet needs 310 British thermal units ^
to give T candle-hour, an electric flaming arc needs
less than i B.T.U. per candle-hour. Again, an in-
candescent gas-light of ordinary Welsbach mantle type
requires 43 B.T.U. per candle-hour, whilst an ordinary
glow-lamp only requires from 10 to 15 B.T.U. per
candle-hour. Yet it is notorious that the incandescent
gas is cheaper than the glow-lamp for equal amounts of
Hght. The explanation lies in the difference in the cost
of the heat ; for the incandescent gas-light gets its heat
by burning gas, whereas the glow-lamp gets its heat
from the electric-energy supplied to- it. And (at the
prices taken) a B.T.U., if manufactured by burning gas,
costs 0*000042 pence, whilst if manufactured by expendi-
ture of electric-energy costs o "00064. That is to say, so
far as production of the mere heat in the lamp is con-
cerned, electricity (at the prices taken) costs fifteen times
as much as gas. But heat is precisely what we do not
want. And because the gas-lamps waste so much of
their energy in mere non-luminous heat, they are not,
when we come to examine the column of figures of costs
per candle-hour, so superior. How much light can we
^ The British thermal tinit is that amount of heat which would
warm i pound of water I degree of the Fahrenheit scale. It is
equal to 251 '98 gramme-calories^ or to 1048 joules, or to 0'000296
kilowatt-hour. One kilowatt-hour equals 3435 British thermal
units-
366 LIGHT lect.
buy for a florin? That question is answered in the
figures of the table. The dearest source, except a bad
glow-lamp (No. 2, which was obviously very inefficient
even for a glow-lamp), is the batswing gas-jet, which
gives for a florin only 2720 candle-hours. The best of
the gas-lights is the high-pressure incandescent, re-
presented in the Table by the Millennium, which gives
25,494, but it is surpassed by the Flame Arc, which
gives 47.619.
During the last two years much progress has been
made with inverted incandescent gas lamps. In this
pattern the Bunsen burner is turned upside down, and
the flame is directed into a mantle hanging like a bag
beneath it. Though this form is not more economical
in itself, it is effectively so, because more of its light is
advantageously downwards.
The Cheapest Form of Light. — Earlier our atten-
tion was drawn to the circumstance that the process
of manufacturing light by incandescence was indirect,
while the process of manufacture by liwiinescence was
direct, the energy being turned into light without the
production of extraneous heat. This is the secret of
the glow-worm and the fire-fly ; but it is also the secret
of the more brilliant phosphorescence of the cathode
rays, as shown you in Crookes' vacuum tubes. Somehow
these insects have found out the way, which man also
has found in the case of the Crookes' tubes, how to
excite the delicate vibrations of the atoms, or of the
electrons associated with them, without having to resort
to the coarser process of setting all the molecules of the
mass dancing with heat. In the possibility of chemical
VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 367
or cathodic means of exciting luminescence lie the
immense opportunities of the future. We in Great
Britain spend annually a gigantic sum, estimated at
from ;2^i 0,000,000 to ;^2o,ooo,ooo in manufacturing
for ourselves such artificial lights as our civilization
demands. Ninety-nine per cent at least of this colossal
sum is thrown away on mere heat. What a future
awaits the man who will invent a practicable luminescence
lamp giving light without heat !
Future Progress. — It is abundantly evident that there
is room for future developments. Progress comes about
in two ways. We may take the existing things and by
careful experiment and attention to detail improve them
bit by bit : that is one way. But every now and then
it happens that a man of genius working in the quiet
of his laboratory discovers some new fact, which is at
first apparently obscure and of no importance. He
publishes the observation by reading a paper to some
learned society : it is printed in its journal of proceedings
and promptly forgotten. Years afterwards, it may be,
some practical man comes along, gets hold of the obscure
fact, and works it up into a shape that has commercial
value. He gets hold of a financier who puts it on the
market, and the world hears of a new invention. Some-
body makes a fortune, but very seldom does it benefit the
original discoverer. The special incandescence of erbia
and thoria was known to the chemists forty years ago ;
but no one heard of incandescent gas-lighting till Auer
von Welsbach devised the mantle to utilize this remark-
able property. I have shown you the remarkable
luminescence of rubies and of willemite when stimulated
368 LIGHT lect,
by cathode discharges in a Crookes' tube ; but lumin-
escent-lamps on that plan are not yet practical.
The great economies effected by high-pressure gas
and by the flame arc are as yet only attained in big lamps.
The immediate want is the production of small lamps of
equal economy. Perhaps we shall have small electric
vapour-lamps before long. One step toward improve-
ment will be the cheapening of the sources of supply,
both of gas and of electric-energy. Gas ought now to
be evaluated not by its supposed candle-power, but by
its calorific power. A gas equal in heating-power to
that now supplied could be made for tenpence per
looo cubic feet if we did not require it to burn with
a bright flame -of its own, and were to use mantles to
get the light. -And electric-energy instead of costing
2*4 pence per unit can be manufactured at far less
than a halfpenny per unit, if manufactured on a large
enough scale. There are tremendous possibilities before
us : but the possibilities before us in the domain of
luminescence are far greater than those in the domain of
incandescence. I have no fear as to the ultimate
solution of the problem of the manufacture of light.
The lamp of the future giving light without extraneous
heat will be a luminescence lamp. It will therefore be
an electric-lamp, but not an incandescent one.
A Radium - lamp. — To the possibilities already
named, science has lately added a new one in the dis-
covery of radium. This surprising and perplexing metal
acts as though it were an inexhaustible source of invisible
radiations of singular power. A few milligrammes of
radium placed near a piece of phosphorescent material
VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 369
such as willemite, cause it to shine in the dark, making
thus a perpetual lamp. You may think that here we
have the promise of the very cheapest source of light.
Alas for such wishes, the laws of economy are not yet to
be over-ridden. Radium is excessively rare and expen-
sive. To produce by its phosphoric stimulus on willemite
a lamp of even i candle-power requires a few milligrammes
of radium, and those few milligrammes will cost at least
£']o. For a capital cost of ^70 one may perhaps get a
perpetual light of i candle-power ! And the mere interest
on the capital will run to something like one farthing
per hour for all the hours that the light would be of
service. Why, a tallow candle would be cheaper. The
dearest of all our sources of light by incandescence does
not run to more than y^o^th of a penny per candle-hour.
So that which seemed to be the cheapest source of
light, costing nothing but interest on capital, turns out
to be the dearest.
Sunlight after all. — No, the cheapest source of light
still remains to be the commonest and most universal,
the light of the sun, which shines alike on rich and poor,
and gives us — such is the admirable economy — a light of
which the dominant wave-length is 50 millionths of a
centimetre, just that wave-length to which our eyes have
become, in the long evolution of the ages, the most
sensitive. By no artificial process can we manufacture
light so cheaply that it would not be still cheaper to
adjust our social habits to the hours of sunlight, and do
our day's work while it is yet day.
INDEX
Abney, Sir William, on emulsion
films, i66
on colour- vision, 1^2 fi^^'^'^^^
on minimum visible luminosity,
211
his measurements of the relative
composition of light, 330
measurements on the absorbing
effect of the atmosphere, 331
Absorption of light by coloured
media, 88
and anomalous dispersion, 104
by black surfaces, 201, 332
of Rontgen rays, 243
effect on sunlight, 331
and emission, 331
Acetylene lamp, 20
Actinic waves, 162, 182
Actinium, 289
Ahrens's polariser, 123
Air-pump, the mercurial, 247, 251
thermometer, experiment with,
202
Aladdin, lamp of, 180
Alexandrite, colours of, 86
Aluminium, transparency of, to
Rontgen rays, 243
leaf, use of, in electroscopes,
269
Amethyst, optical properties of,
134
Ampere's construction, 69
Amplitude of wave-motion, 9
Analyser, 117
Analysis of light by prism or
grating, 79, 86
Animatograph, 97
Anomalous refraction, 100
Ansc^iitz's moving pictures, 97
Antikathode, the, 265
Antipyrin, optical properties of,
150
Arc-lamp, emission of light by,
III, 310
whiteness of light of, 211
magnetite, 359, 361
new kinds of, 357, 361
Artificial rainbow, 79, 80
Ayrton and Perry, on ratio of the
electric units, 233
Becquerel, Professor Henri, his
discovery of radiations from
uranium salts, 272, 278, 284
Becquerel rays, 278, 284
power of causing the discharge
of electrified bodies, 285
compared with Rontgen rays,
292
Benham's colour-top, 96
Bid well, Shelford, on fatigue of
retina, (^6 footnote
strange colour-effects, 99 foot-
note
Black, is mere absence of light, 72
cross, in polariscope, 134, 152
surfaces absorb waves and grow
warm, 202
371
372
LIGHT
Black surfaces radiate better than
bright, 203
radiation of black bodies at
different temperatures, 339
Blue and yellow make white, 89,
146, 188
Blue of the sky, theory of, 233
Bologna stone, 177
Bolometer, use of, 197, 334
Boltzmann, Professor Ludwig von,
on electro-optics, 234
Bose, Professor J. Chunder, his
apparatus for optical study of
electric waves, 226
on polarisation of electric
waves, 227
Boyle, Hon. Robert, on phosphor-
escence of diamonds, 177
Brdmont, M., 289
Bright field, 118, 212
Brightness of lights, 14
Brodhun and Lummer Photo-
meter, 1 9
Burning-glass, 37
mirror, 206
Calc-spar : see Iceland spar
Calorific waves, 162, 193, 197
Campbell -Swinton, A. A., his
photographs by Rontgen
rays, 270
Candle, standard, 14, 20, 314
Canton's phosphorus, 175
Casciarolo of Bologna, 177
Chalcolite, 289
Chemical effects of waves, 163, 166
Chemi-luminescence, 175, 176
Christiansen dn anomalous dis-
persion, 100
Cold, apparent radiation of, 205
"Colonia" gas compressor, 349,
350
Colour and wave-length, 71, 72
sensations, primarj', 183
top, Benham's, 97
vision, 183
Coloured stuffs viewed in coloured
light, 82
Colours that are not in the spec-
trum, 87
complementary, 91, 11 1, 136,
188
of polarised light, 136
of thin plates, 137
of soap bubbles, 138
supplementary, 149
Combination of colours, 84, 85,
142
to produce white light, 83, 146
Complementary colours, 91, 188
tints, 91, 93, III, 188
in bright and dark field, 136
in double-image prism, 149
Concave lens, diverges light, 41
mirror, reflexion by, 27
Contrast tints, 92, 93, 99
Convergence of light to focus by
reflexion, 26
by refraction, 35, 37, 41
Convex lens, converges the light,
40
mirror, reflexion by, 24, 28
Cooper-Hewitt mercury vapour
lamp, 360
Cornea of eye, 44
Corpuscular theory of light, 230
Critical angle, 39.
Crookes, Sir William, his radio-
meter, 199, 213, 252
tube used by Rontgen, 239,
241
improvements in vacuum pump,
250
on repulsion due to radiation,
252
on properties of kathode rays,
253
views on radiant matter, 253,
258
tube with shadow of cross, 255
invented focus tube, 256
his spinthariscope, 298
vacuum tubes, 366
Cryptoscope, 268
Crystalline lens of the eye, 44
Crystallo-luminescence, 175
INDEX
373
Crystals, elasticity of, 129
Curie, M. Pierre, 288, 289
experiments with radium, 292
on heat emitted by radium, 299
Curie, Madame, her apparatus
for detecting radio-activity,
287
results of her investigations of
the various compounds of
uranium, 288
discovers polonium and radium,
289
experiments with radium, 292
Curvature, printed on the wave-
front, 24
imprinted by lens or curved
mirror, 43, 56, 67
expansion of, 61
Cylindrical lens, 49, 83
Dark field, 119, 120
for polarised heat-waves, 212
Davy, Sir Humphry, on reflexion
of heat, 206
Debierne, M. , obtains actinium
from pitchblende, 289
Delezenne's polariser, 12,2) footnote
Den,ser medium, 35
Density and refractivity, 49
Detection of false gems by polar-
ised light, 133
by Rontgen rays, 272
Detectors of electric waves, 217,
223, 226
Dewar, Professor James, on phos-
phorescence of bodies cooled
in liquid air, 179
Diakathodic rays, 279
Diamond does not polarise light,
134
phosphorescence of, 177, 178
transparency of, to Rontgen
rays, 270
Dielectrics, 104, 232
Difference of phase, 136
Diffraction-grating, 31, -jj, 79
spectrum, 78
Diffuse reflexion, 30
Dioptrie, definition of, 59
Direction of the vibrations in
polarised light, 233
Diselectrification by ultra -viole,
light, 181
by Rontgen rays, 268
Dispersion of light by prism, 74
anomalous, 100
and frequency, 158
Divergence of light from focus by
reflexion, 24
by refraction, 41
Divergivity, 62
Double-image prism, 125
Double refraction, 120
refraction. Lord Rayleigh on
theory of, 233
Ebonite, transparency of, for
heat-waves, 213
optical and dielectric properties
of> 233
Effluvio-luminescence, 175
Elasticity in crystals, \2.<^ foot7iote
axes of, 131
Elastic-solid theory of light, 156
Electric oscillations, 219
waves, 214
waves, prediction of, by Clerk
Maxwell, 229
sparks in vacuo, luminosity due
to, 247
sparks, oscillatory, 218
lamps, table of efflciencies of,
361
lighting, invention of, 304
vapour lamp, 360, 361
Electricity discharged by ultra
violet light, 181
by Rontgen rays, 268
incandescence by, 309
Electro-luminescence, 175
Electromagnetic theory of anomal-
ous dispersion, 102
theory of light, 230
' ' Electrons," 294
Electroscope, used for photo-elec-
tric experiments, 181
D
374
LIGHT
Electroscope, as detector of electric
waves, 223
with aluminium leaves, 181, 269
use of, by Lenard, 259
use in observing diselectrifica-
tion, 269
for observation of radio-activity,
286, 287
Emission of light at different tem-
peratures, 174, 331
measurement of, 333
Emissivity of the rare earths, 344
Emulsion films in photography,
166
Energy curves, 334, 335
spectra of black body, 341, 343
of platinum, 343
Ether, the, 108, 230
Eye, the, sensitiveness of, 14, 328
as optical instrument, 43
images are inverted in, 45
unable to detect polarisation,
III
of codfish, in polarised light, 151
Fairy Fountain, 39
Faraday, Professor Michael, first
experiments in electro -optics,
229, 230
his electromagnetic theory of
light, 231
on the production of flame, 309
Fatigue, effects of, x-\foot7iote, 93,
96
Fechner's law of magnitude of sen-
sation, -L^ footnote
Filter-screens for invisible light,
164, 213
Fireflies, luminescence of, 176,
311. 337
rays emitted by, pass through
copper, 278
light of the American, 337
FitzGerald, Professor George F. ,
on electromagnetic theor}' of
reflexion and refraction, 233
on starting waves in the ether,
234
Fizeau, on number of waves in
train, 112, o.-j ^ foot?iote
Flame standards, 314
Flames, radiation of heat by, 203
Fleming, Professor J. A. , magnetic
action on kathode rays, 255
his electric lamp, 2,'^^ footnote
"Flicker" photometers, 2>'^i, foot-
note
Fluorescence, phenomejion of, 169
experiments in, 170, 283
table of, 175
Fluorescent screens, 268
use of, in ultra-violet light, 172
Fluoroscope, 268
Fluor-spar, transparency to ultra-
violet light, 164, 166
photo - luminescence (fluores -
cence) of, 169
thermo-luminescence of, 180
Focus, real, 26, 37
virtual, 26
tubes, Crookes's, 256
, , the author's, 265
,, Jackson's, 266
,, Bohm's, 267
Formulae for refraction, 61
for lenses, 65, 67
for reflexion, 67
Foucault's modification of Nicol's
prism, 121
Frequencies and wave-lengths,
table of, 190
Frequency of sound waves, 106
of different colours, 190
Fresnel's theory of light, 157
views as to direction of vibra-
tions, 233
GaUtzine, Prince, on alleged
polarisation of Rontgen rays,
2.61 footnote
Gases, optical and dielectric pro-
perties of, 233
glow in vacuum tubes, 248
Gas flame, temperatures in, 308
Gas-lighting, invention of, 304
high-pressure incandescent, 349
INDEX
375
Gas-lights, incandescent, 345
mantle, inverted, distribution
of luminous rays, 321
Geissler's tubes, 247
Gems, optical properties of, 86,
119, 120, 133, 134, 178, 254
Geometrical optics, methods of, 55
Germany, research in, 263
Gifford, J. W. , his photographs by
Rontgen rays, 270
Gladstone, Dr. J. Hall, on photo-
graphing the invisible, 168
Glass, velocity of light in, 35
polarising properties of un-
annealed, 151
strain in, 152
absorption of ultra-violet light
by, 164
opacity of, to ultra-violet light,
166, 174
opacity of, to heat-waves, 198
opacity of, to Rontgen rays,
271, 272
Glazebrook's Report on Optical
Theories, 158
Glovv^ lamps, 310, 361
electric, distribution of luminous
rays, 321
electric efficiency of, 351
test chart of twenty-four, 352
new kinds of, 354
Glow-worm light will pass through
aluminium, 278
Glow-worms, luminescence of, 176,
178, 311, 337
Goethe, his theory of colours, 76
Goldstein, Dr. Eugen, on rays
behind the kathode, 280
Granite, in polarised light, 134
Grating, diffraction produced by, 31
Green cannot be made by mixing
pure yellow and blue, 89
Haidinger's brushes, iii footjiote
Hartnack's modification of Nicol's
prism, 121
Hauksbee, Francis, on electric
luminosity, 245, 246
Heat-indicating point, 206
waves reflected to focus, 206
shadows, 209
spectrum, 162, 197
Heating effect of waves, 162
by absorption of waves, 201
Heaviside, Oliver, on propagation
of energy, 233
Hefner's standard lamp, 20, 314
footnote
Helium, 301, 327
Helmholtz, Hermann von, on
anomalous refraction, 102
on electromagnetic theory, 234
Herschel, Sir J. W. F. , on plane
of polarisation, 158
Sir William, on heat spectrum,
200
Hertz, Professor Heinrich, on dis-
electrification, 181
discovery of electric waves,
214
on oscillatory sparks, 214
his oscillators, 215, 221
on reflexion of waves, 217, 220
effect of his discoveries, 234
waves, model illustrating pro-
pagation of, 237
on transparency of metal films
to kathode rays, 258
Hittorf, Professor W. , on kathode
phenomena, 252
Hopkinson, Professor John, on
optical and electric proper-
ties, 233
Horn, optical properties of, 150
Home's luminescent stuff, 178
Huygens's principle of wave pro-
pagation, 9
construction, 69
Hydraulic compressor, automatic,
350
Hyperfluorescence, 285
Ice, apparent radiation of cold
by, 205
optical and dielectric properties
of, 233
376
LIGHT
Iceland spar, 120, 129, 174, 198
Illumination of a surface, 15
Image of a luminous point, 22
in mirror, position of, 23
Images, formation of, 28
inverted, 30
in eye are inverted, 45, 47
Incandescence, the process of,
210, 306
solid particles in, 307
by electricity, 309
Incandescent gas-lights, 345
high-pressure, 348
Incandescent solids and vapours,
spectra of, 326
Infra-red waves, 192
Interference of waves, 10
of light produces colours, 141
Internal reflexion, 39
Inverse squares, law of, 16
Invisible, the photography of the,
168
Invisible spectrum, ultra-violet
part, 160
infra-red part, 192
Iodine vapour, anomalous refrac-
tion of, 100
Irrationahty of dispersion, 78
Isokathodic rays, 280
Ives's method of registering colour
by photography, 185
photochromoscope, 187
Jackson, Professor Herbert, his
focus tube, 266
Japanese mirrors, 50
Jelly, vibrations transmitted by.
Kaleidoscope, principle of, 33
Karnojitzky on alleged polarisa-
tion of Rontgen rays, 261
footnote
Kathode irays, 253
focusing of, 256
name ihappropriate, 258
new varieties of, 266, 279
Kathode, phenomena at, 249
shadows, 252, 254
, , magnetic deflexion of,
255. 257
streams, 253, 256
Kathodo-luminescence, 175
Kearton, J. W. , his magic mirrors,
53
Kelvin, Lord, theory of the ether,
234
Kern burners, 347
Kerr, Dr. John, magneto -optic
discoveries, 234
Kromskop, 187
Kundt, August, on anomalous re-
fraction, loi, 103
Lamp, arc-, images of carbons
in, 29
Hefner's standard, 20
monochromatic, 82
Langley, Professor S. P. , on
longest waves, 190, 197
his bolometer, 197
his curves for one unit of heat,
335
on the production of light
without heat, 337
Law of Fechner, 1^ footnote
of inverse squares, 16
Le Roux on anomalous dispersion,
100
Lenard, Professor Philipp, his
researches, 258
diselectrifying effect of kathode
rays, 259
Length of wave : see wave-length
Lens, crystalline, principle of, 36,
40
of eye, 44
Lens, cylindrical, 49
measurer, 59
Light, velocity of, 2, 33, 129, 156
emission of, 332
manufacture of, 302-569
primitive sources of, 302
cold lights, 311
INDEX
377
Light, two different Ways of
manufacturing, 312
bad economy of ordinary sources ,
336
cost of, 362
cheapest form of, 366
future progress, 367
Lights, measurement of, 315
inequaUty of distribution, 317
inequality of composition, 323
relative composition of, 330
Limelight, 309
Lippmann, Professor Gabriel, on
photography in colour, 184
Lodge, Professor Oliver Joseph,
his oscillators, 222
his detector, 223
his apparatus for optical study
of electric waves, 224
illustrations of Maxwell's theory,
234
on electric oscillations, 235
London, University of, contrasted
with that of Wlirzburg, 262
Longest waves of infra-red, 190
Lumiere, the Brothers, their pro-
cess of colour-photography,
iS^ footnote
Luminescence, 174, 311
of radium compounds, 298
Luminescent screen in ultra-violet
light, 172, 241
used by Rontgen, 239, 241
best kind of, 268
Luminous efficiency, 312
Luminous paint, 177, 311
Lummer, Prof. Otto, his photo-
meter, 0.0 footnote
on the energy spectra of black
body and of platinum, 342
Lyo-luminescence, 175
MacCullagh's theory of light,
.157
views as to direction of vibra-
tions, 233
Magenta, absorption spectrum of,
87. 104
Magenta, anomalous refraction
of, 100, 104
Magnetite arc-lamp, 359, 361
Magneto -optic discoveries, 230,
234
Manufacture of light : see Light
Maxwell, Professor James Clerk,
on colour- vision, 183
predicted electric waves, 214
electromagnetic theory of light..
229
on Faraday's electromagnetic
theory, 231
Meldola, Professor, on the light
of the glow-worm, 337
Mendenhall, C. E. , on luminous
efficiency, ■^i'^^ footnote
Mercurial air-pump, 247, 251
phosphorus, 246
Mica, optical properties 01, 137,
146
Michelson, Professor, on number
of waves in train, wo. footnote
Millennium light, 349
distribution of luminous rsiys,
321
Miller's limit of shortest waves, 191
Mirage, experiment illustrating, 48
Mirror, magic, reflexion of lij ht
by, 21
of Japan, 50
English, 53
Mirrors, concave and convex, 24
paraboloidal, for reflecting heat-
waves, 206
parabolic, used by Hertz, 220
Model illustrating Stokes's theory
of Rontgen rays, 275
illustrating propagation of Hertz-
wave, 237
Models of wave-motions, 8, 109,
115, 124, 130, 236
Molecular bombardment, 253
Monochromatic lamp, 82
Monoyer on definition of dioptric,
59
Morton, President Henry, his
fluorescent dyes, 171
378
LIGHT
Mother-of-pearl, colours of, 79
Moving pictures, 97
Muraoka, Dr., on fire-fly light,
278
Muybridge, on movements of
animals, 97
Nernst lamp, 354, 361
distribution of luminous rays,
321
New kinds of kathode rays, 279
Newton's colour-whirler, 84
theory of nature of white light,
n, 83, 86, 323
tints, 137
rings, 138
table of, 140
explanation of, 142
Nichols, Edward Fox, on anomal-
ous refraction, 104
and Rubens's longest waves,
190
Nicol, William, his polarising
prism, 121
prism, modern varieties of, 121
Nodal points in reflected waves,
217
Opacity and electric conductivity,
relation between, 232, 234
of electric conductors, 232
Opacity of glass to invisible hght,
166, 174, 198, 271
of metals to Rontgen rays,
243
Optical circle, for demonstrating
refraction, 38
illusions, 92, 94, 96, 99
rotator, zt.-^ footnote
Orders of Newton's tints, 139
Ordinary and extraordinary waves,
125
Orthochromatic photography, 183
Oscillating sparks, 214, 218
Oscillator, Hertz's, 215, 221
Osmium lamp, 354, 355, 361
Osram lamp, 356
Paint, luminous, 177, 178, 311
heat-indicating, 208
Parabolic mirrors. Hertz's, 220
Paraboloidal mirrors for reflecting
heat, 206
Paraffin oil, fluorescence of, 169
lamp, unequal distribution of
flame, 318
Parakathodic rays, 279
Paschen's longest waves, 190
Pentadecylparatolylketone, 241
footnote
Permanganate of potash, absorp-
tion by, 88
Perrin, Jean, on refraction of
Rontgen rays, 2.6x footnote
Persistence of vision, 93, 97
Petroleum, fluorescence of, 169
Phase, difference of, 136
Phenakite, kathodo-luminescence
of, 254
Phosphorescence, 175, 311
Phosphorus, luminescence of, 176
Canton's artificial, 177
the mercurial, 246
nature of rays emitted by, 278
Photochemical effects of light, 163,
166
Photochromoscope, 187
Photo-electric effects of Hght, 181,
182, 268
Photographic waves, 162, 182
spectrum, 166
registration of Rontgen shadows,
245
Photography of the invisible, 168
in natural colours, 183, 184
the " new," 245
Photo-luminescence, 175, 176
Photometer, 14, 315
Thompson and Starling's, 18
Trotter's, 18
Brodhun and Lummer's, 19-20
footnote, '^ic^ footnote
Bunsen's, ig footnote
Joly's, 19
Rood's, -J,! c^ footnote
Simmance-Abady's, 315
INDEX
379
Photometry, 313
Pigments darken the light, 83
Pink not a spectrum colour, 87
Pitchblende, 288-290
Plane- waves, 7
Platinocyanides, their optical pro-
perties, 172, 281
Polarisation, 105
plane of, 158
of electric waves, 225, 227
of Rontgen rays, attempts at,
261
Polariscope, simple, 153
Polarisers, different kinds of, 113
Polonium, 289
Positive curvature, definition of,
59
lens, definition of, 59
Poynting, Professor J. H. , on
ripple-tanks, 6
on energy paths, 233
Primary colour sensations, 86, 89,
91, 183
tints, 86, 91
Prism, refracting, 74
direct-vision, 80
Foucault's, 121
Hartnack's, 121
Nicol's, 121
double-image, 125
Prismatic spectrum, 74
irrationality of, 78
Propagation of waves, 9
of light in glass, 35
of waves longitudinally, 106
of waves transversely, 107, 237
Purple not a spectrum colour, 87
analysis of, 87
Quarter- wave plate, 148
use of, 12.2, footnote, 148
Quartz, anomalous dispersion of,
104
rotatory optical properties of,
154
transparency of, to ultra-violet
light, 164
Quartz lenses and prisms, use of,
164, 170, 174
tribo-luminescence of, 181
transparency of, to heat-waves,
198
Quinine, fluorescent property of,
169, 171, 172
Radiant heat, 193, 299
matter, 253, 258
Radiation, t^O) faotjiote
from radium, 291, 298
temperature and quality of, 339
wave-length of the dominant,
340 _
Radio-activity, electroscope suit-
able for observation of, 286
Radiometer, Crookes's, 199, 213,
Radio-micrometer, 334
Radium, discovery of, 289
its cost, 290, 369
power to ionise the air, 291
experiments with, 292
deflexion of the rays, 293
the alpha, beta, and gamma
rays, 294-298
continually evolves heat, 299
disintegration of the radium
atom, 300
Radium clock, Hon. R. J. Strutt's,
297
lamp, 368
salt, temperature of, 299
Rainbow due to refraction, 73
artificial, 79, 80
Ray-filters for infra-red light, 213
for ultra-violet light, 164
Rayleigh, Lord, on shadows of
sounds, 5
on anomalous refraction, loi
Theory of Sound, 107
on electromagnetic theory of
light, 233
on blue of the sky, 233
on double-refraction, 233
Rays, non-existence of, 12 foot-
note
38o
LIGHT
Rays, kathode, use of term, 257
uranium, 278, 284
radium, 292
Real focus, 26
Reflexion by plane mirror, 21
by convex mirror, 24
by concave mirror, 26, 27
irregular or diffuse, 30
by multiple mirrors, 33
of heat-waves, 206, 209
alleged, of Rontgen rays, 260
Refraction of light, 35
anomalous, 100
double, 120
feeble, of Rontgen rays, 261
Resolution of vibrations, 126
Resonator, Hertz's, 216
Retina of the eye, 45
fatigue of, 93, 96, 99
Reversibility, the principle of, 282
Righi, Professor Augusto, his os-
cillators, 221
his apparatus for optical study
of electric waves, 225
Ripples, on water, 6
convergence and divergence of,
12
Ripple-tank, 6
Rock-salt lenses and prisms, use
of, 194
transparency to ultra-violet light,
166
transparency to infra-red light,
198
Rontgen, Professor Wilhelm Kon-
rad, 262
account of his discovery, 238
his form of tube, 260
his theory of the rays, 273
Rontgen rays, properties of, 240
penetrative power of, 243, 292
not deflected by magnet, 260,
292
are not kathode rays, 260
are not ordinary ultra-violet
light, 260
are not reflected, 260
point of origin of, 264
Rontgen rays, curious lateral
emission of, 265
shadows of bones made by, 269
speculations as to nature of, 273
compared with Becquerel rays,
292
Rosaniline, absorption spectrum
of, 87, 104
anomalous refraction of, 100,
104
Rotation of polarised light by
quartz and sugar, 154
in magnetic field, 230, 234
by reflexion at magnet pole, 234
Rotator, optical, yq.-^ footnote
Rowland's ruling machine, 77
Rubens, Professor, on the emis-
sivity of solid particles, 345
on the emissive power of the
Welsbach mantle, 347
Rubens's and Nichol's longest
waves, 190
Rubies, real and sham, 133
glow in kathode stream, 254
transparency of, to Rontgen
rays, 272
luminescence of, 367
Rumford, Count, on radiation of
heat, 206
Rupert's drops, optical properties
of, xt^x footnote
Rutherford, Professor, on the
disintegration of the radium
atom, 300
Salicine, optical properties of, 135
Schumann'slimit of shortest waves,
191
Scott-Snell burner, 350
Selenite, crystal films of, 133, 136,
145, 148
Sensitiveness of eye, 14
Shadows, light penetrates into, 4,
12
of sounds, 4
of heat, 209
cast by Rontgen rays, 242
kathodic, in Crookes's tubes, 255
INDEX
381
191
Shortest waves in ultra-violet,
Silk, shot, reflexion by, 31
Smithells, Professor, on tempera-
tures in gas flame, 308
Smoothness, optical definition of,
21
Soap-bubbles, colours of, 138
Sound-waves, size of, 3
frequency of, 106
Spar, calc : see spar, Iceland
Spar, Iceland, 120, 129, 174,
198
Spectrimi analysis, vii, 87
of colours, 74
produced by prism, 75, 100
produced by diffraction-grating,
77
visible part of, 161
invisible parts of, 161
the photographic, 166
the long, 173
teaching of the, 325
Speed of light : see Velocity
Spherometer, 59
Spinthariscope, Sir William
Crookes's, 298
Sprengel's vacuum-pump, 250
Crookes's improvements in, 250
Standard candle, 14, 20, 314
lamp, 20, 2^i\foot7iote
Stationary waves, 184, 217
Steinmetz, Dr. C. P. , his magnetite
arc-lamp, 359
Stokes, Sir George Gabriel, his
discoveries in fluorescence,
169, 172, 283
his theory of Rontgen rays,
273
shortest waves observed by,
191
Strain in imperfectly annealed
glass, 151
in compressed glass, 152
Strobic circles, 96
Strutt, Hon. R. J. , on radio-active
matter, 291
his radium clock, 297
Subjective colours, 92
Sugar, luminescence of, 180
rotatory properties of, 155
Supplementary tints, 149
Talbot on anomalous refraction,
100
Tantalum lamp, 354, 355, 361
Temperature in relation to emis-
sion of light, 174, 211
Thaumatrope, 94
Thermo-luminescence, 175, 180
Thermometer, to explore infra-red
spectrum, 193, 200
air, experiment with, 202
Thermopile, use of, 194, 196, 203,
207, 212, 334
Thomson, Professor Joseph John,
on ratio of units, 233
Thorium salts, radio-active proper-
ties of, 291
Three-colour method of photo-
graphy, 183
Tints of spectrum, 72
complementary, 91, 93, in,
136, 149, 188
Newton's, 137, 142
supplementary, 149
Total internal reflexion, 39
Tourmaline, optical properties of,
119, 120
opacity and conductivity of, 234
Trains of waves, 112, 219, 222, 273
Transition-tintj 139
Transparency of flesh, leather, and
paper, 243
Transverse waves, 108
Tribo-luminescence, 175, 180
Trichromic theory of colour-vision,
183
Tungsten lamp, 355, 361
Turner, Dr. Dawson, on glow-
worm hght, 278
Tyndall, Professor John, his use
of colour disks, 92
experiments on reflexion of
heat-waves, 209
On Sound, 107
lectures on light, 171
382
LIGHT
Tyndall, Professor John, his wave-
filter for infra-red, 213
on the spectrum of the arc-
lamp, 334
Ultra-violet light, 160, 162
chemical effects of, 167
reflexion, etc., of, 174
light, diselectrification by, 181
Universities of London and Wiirz-
burg, 262
Uranium, great density and opacity
of, 244
its radio-activity, 299, 301
Uranium glass, fluorescence of, 169
nitrate, tribo-luminescence of,
180
rays, 278, 284, 285
" Uranium X," 301
Vacuum-pump, the mercurial,
247, 251
Vapour lamp, electric, 360, 361
Velocity of light in air, 2, 33
in water, 33
in glass, 33
of heat-waves, 212
of propagation of electric dis-
turbances, 232
Velocity-constant, definition of, 60
Vernon Harcourt pentane lamp,
314
Virtual focus, 26, 27
Wave-length, 4, 7, 72
motion models, 8, 124, 236
front, motion of, 9
tables of, 72, 190
filters for infra-red waves, 213
Wave-length of electric waves, 214
Wave-lengths of different sources
of radiation, 340, 342
Wave-theory of hght, 230
Waves, travelling of, 7, 106, 237
propagation of, 9, 106, 156,
157. 233
Waves, trains of, 112, 219, 222,
273
Weber, Professor Wilhelm, on
ratio of electric units, 232
Webster, Rt. Hon. Sir Richard,
his hand, 270
Wedding, Professor W. , on
luminous efficiency, -^i-^ foot-
note, 336
his comparison of sources of
light, 362, 364
Welsbach mantle, 342, 345
its emissive power, 347
distribution of luminous rays,
319. 320
Wheatstone, Sir Charles, on
velocity of electric disturb-
ances, 232
Wheel of life, 97
White light, analysed, 79, 149
synthesis of, 83, 84, 90
Whiteness, no standard of, known,
211 foot7iote
Wiedemann, Professor Eilhard, on
luminescence, 174, 180 foot-
note
his "discharge-rays," 276, 278
Willemite, 298
luminescence of, 367
Winkelmann, Professor A., on re-
fraction of Rontgen rays, 261
footnote
Wiirzburg, University of, 262
X-luminescence, 175, 260
X-rays : see Rontgen rays
Yellow not a primary colour-
sensation, 89
Young, Dr. Thomas, on colour-
sensation, 183
Young, Professor, on the light of
the American fire-fly, 337
Zoetrope, 97
Printed hi Great Britain by R. & R. Ci.akk', Ltmiikd, Edinburgh.
OTHER WORKS BY
Prof. SILVANUS P. THOMPSON
LIFE OF WILLIAM THOMSON, BARON
KELVIN OF LARGS. Illustrated. Two vols.
8vo. 30s. net.
ELEMENTARY LESSONS IN ELECTRICITY
AND MAGNETISM. New Edition, completely
revised (191 5). Fcap. 8vo. 5s. 6d.
THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT. Crown 8vo.
IS. 3d. net.
CONTRIBUTIONS TO PHOTOGRAPHIC
OPTICS. By Otto Lummer. Translated and
augmented by Dr. SiLVANUS P. Thompson. 8vo.
7s. 6d. net.
TREATISE ON LIGHT. By Christiaan Huygens.
Rendered into English by Dr. SiLVANUS P.
Thompson. Fcap. 4to. los. net.
CALCULUS MADE EASY. Second Edition.
Globe 8vo. 3s.
MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd., LONDON.
WORKS ON PHYSICS.
THE THEORY OF LIGHT. By Thomas Preston,
F.R.S. Fifth Edition. Edited by Prof. A. W.
Porter, D.Sc. 25s. net.
TREATISE ON PRACTICAL LIGHT. By R. S.
Clay, D.Sc. 12s. 6d. net.
PRACTICAL EXERCISES IN LIGHT. By R. S.
Clay, D.Sc. 3s.
LIGHT FOR STUDENTS. By E. Edser, A.R.C.Sc.
78.
OPTICS: A Manual for Students. By A. S.
Percival, M.A., M.B. 12s. 6d. net.
ILLUMINATION : Its Distribution and Measure-
ment. By Alexander Pelham Trotter.
I OS. 6d. net.
PHYSICAL OPTICS. By Robert W. Wood, LL.D.
Second Edition. 21s. net.
MIRRORS, PRISMS AND LENSES: A Text-
book of Geometrical Optics. By Prof. James
P. C. SouTHALL. 2 IS. net.
RESEARCHES IN MAGNETO-OPTICS. By
Prof. P. Zeeman, Sc.D. 7s. 6d. net.
X-RAYS AND ELECTRONS. An Outline of
Recent X-Ray Theory. By 'Prof. Arthur H.
CoMPTON, Ph.D. 25s. net.
LENS COMPUTING BY TRIGONOMETRICAL
TRACE. By Col. J. W. Gifford, F.R.A.S.
With a Foreword by Prof. F. Cheshire, C.B.E.
7s. 6d. net.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON.
2
t
WORKS ON PHYSICS.
TEXT-BOOK OF PHYSICS. By J. Duncan,
Wh.Ex., MT.M.E., and S. G. Starling, B.Sc,
A.R.C.Sc. i8s. Also in parts: Dynamics. 6s.
Heat, Light and Sound. 7s. 6d. Magnetism
and Electricity. 5s. Heat. 4s. 6d. Light and
Sound. 4s. 6d. Heat and Light. 6s.
A TEXT-BOOK OF PRACTICAL PHYSICS.
By Prof. H. S. Allen, M.A., D.Sc, and H.
Moore, A.R.C.S., B.Sc. los. 6d. Part I.,
Properties of Matter. 4s. Parts II., HI., and
IV., Sound, Light and Heat. 4s. Parts I.
and IV. 5s. Part IV. is. gd. Parts V. and
VI., Magnetism and Electricity. 4s.
DICTIONARY OF APPLIED PHYSICS. By
Various Writers. Edited by Sir Richard
Glazebrook, K.C.B., Sc.D., F.R.S. Illustrated.
In 5 vols. 8vo. /^3 : 3s. net each. The set of
5 vols. ;{^i4 : 14s. net. Vol. I. Mechanics,
Engineering and Heat. Vol. II. Electricity.
Vol. HI. Metrology, Meteorology, and Measur-
ing Appliances. Vol. IV. Optics, Sound and
Radiology. Vol. V. Aeronautics, Metallurgy
and General Index.
GENERAL PHYSICS FOR STUDENTS. A
Text-Book on the Fundamental Properties of
Matter. Reprinted with additions. By E.
Edser, A.R.C.Sc. 8s. 6d.
EVERYDAY PHYSICS. By H. E. Hadley, B.Sc.
Complete. 6s. 6d. Section I. 2s. 6d. Sections
II.-IV. 2s. 6d. Section V. 2s. 6d.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON.
3
WORKS ON PHYSICS.
LECTURES ON THEORETICAL PHYSICS. By
Prof. H. A. LoRENTZ, For. Mem. R.S. Trans-
lated by Dr. L. Silberstein and A. P. H.
Trivelli. Vol. I. Aether Theories and Aether
Models. Edited by Dr. H. Bremekamp.
Kinetical Problems. Edited by Dr. E. D.
Bruins and Dr. J. Reudler. 12s. 6d. net.
'Vol. 11. Thermodynamics. Edited by T. C.
Clay-Jolles. Entropy and Probability. Edited
by C. A. Crommelin, Ph.D. The Theory of
Radiation. Edited by A. D. Fokker, Ph.D.
The Theory of Quanta. Edited by G. L. de
Haas-Lorentz, Ph.D. 21s. net.
PHYSICS FOR COLLEGES. By Profs. H. Horton
Sheldon, C. V. Kent, C. W. Miller and
R. F. Paton. I 6s. net.
INTRODUCTION TO CONTEMPORARY
PHYSICS. By. Dr. Karl K. Darrow. 25s.
net.
A HISTORY OF PHYSICS IN ITS ELEMENT-
ARY BRANCHES. By Prof F. Cajori, Ph.D.
I OS. 6d. net.
THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY. By L.
Silberstein, Ph.D. Second Edition. 25s. net.
THE ORIGIN, NATURE, AND INFLUENCE
OF RELATIVITY. By Prof George D.
BiRKHOFF. 8s. 6d. net.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON.
4
BOSTON COLLEGE
3 9031 01530693 9
^55893
BOSTON COLLEGE LIBRARY
UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS
CHESTNUT HILL, MASS.
Books may be kept for two weeks and may-
be renewed for the same period, unless re-
served.
Two cents a day is charged for each book
kept overtime.
If you cannot find what you want, ask the
Librarian who will be glad to help you.
The borrower is responsible for books drawn
on his card and for all fines accruing on the
same.
ii-iiz !r-,s;sss'
tiAim
'^WWBBMB^H^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^BB^^
ifB
'^flMMffi i t r?Jr!^^Sill^B^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^BP^^^ '
^^^^^^^^h^^^BHH^HHB^^^^^^^HbH^bb^^^^^^^^b^^^^
Iqi^
igiiifnmji«" • •''•'''•^'TiBBBBBBllll^^^^^^^^^^BBB^BIIlHBIininlMWlilliliB
'f'^f'^T'**' '^"i^^iS^^^ttSttmKsS^tituitS^^^^^^^^^^^
w
■«uc
'^'^^^^^^titnRiHmaaHRHnHnHBnaMHHnRna^