^^■^^■HUBhIH^^I^^^^H ^^^^^^^^^^^^HHHBiH^^^^^I ^^^^^M^nm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^1 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^■IH ^^^^^^^^^^Ibh ^■1 ^ggsmj; • 'A // / LIGHT, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited LONDON • BOMBAY • CALCUTTA • MADRAS MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO DALLAS • SAN FRANCISCO THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd. TORONTO LIGHT VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE A SERIES OF LECTURES DELIVERED AT THE ROYAL INSTITUTION OF GREAT BRITAIN, AT CHRISTMAS, 1896 WITH ADDITIONAL LECTURES BY SILVANUS P: THOMPSON, ^N D.Sc, F.R.S., M.R.I. PRINCIPAL OF, AND PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS IN, THE CITY AND GUILDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE, FINSBURY, LONDON SECOND EDITION, ENLARGED *«W COLLEGE UBHahY I CJMrrNUT HHJL, MASS. MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON 1928 ttOSTON COLL!»E tlBRAt^" CHESTNUT HILL, MASS. COPYRIGHT First Edition i8g7 Second Edition, enlarged^ 1910, 1912, 1919, 1921, 1928 255899 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN EY R. & R. CLARK, LIMITED, EDINBURGH INTRODUCTION Two things are expected of a lecturer who undertakes a course of Christmas lectures at the Royal Institution. In the first place his discourses must be illustrated to the utmost extent by experiments. In the second, however simple the language, in which scientific facts and principles are described, every discourse must sound at least some note of modernity, must reflect some wave of recent progress in science. So in undertaking a course of lectures in Optics in the year 1896 the lecturer ventured to proceed on certain lines which may, perhaps, seem strange to the sedate student whose knowledge of optics has been acquired on the narrower basis of the orthodox text- book. The ideas developed in the first lecture arose from the conviction that the time-honoured method of teaching geometrical optics — a method in which the wave-nature of light is steadily ignored — is funda- VI LIGHT mentally wrong. For the sake of students and teachers of optics he has added to Lecture I. an Appendix, in which the newer ideas are further developed. Other Appendices have been added to the later Lectures, with the aim of filling up some of the gaps left in the subjects as treated in the lecture theatre. Now that the electromagnetic nature of all light- waves has been fully demonstrated, no apology is needed for bringing into the fifth Lecture a few of the experi- mental points upon which that demonstration rests. That these fundamental points can be given without any great complication of either thought or language is in itself the strongest argument for making that demonstration an essential feature at an early stage in the teaching of the science. Many of the ideas which must be grasped, for example that of the polarisation of light, are popularly supposed to be extremely difficult; whereas the difficulty lies not in the ideas themselves so much as in the language in which they are generally set forth. In an experience lasting over a good many years, the author has found that the main points in the phenomena of polarisation are quite easily grasped by persons of ordinary intelligence — even by children — provided they are presented in a modern way devoid of pedantic INTRODUCTION vil terms, and illustrated by appropriate models. A similar remark would equally apply to other parts of optics, such as interference and diffraction, which are barely alluded to in the present lectures. Many branches are necessarily omitted altogether from so brief a course : amongst them the entire subject of spectrum analysis, the construction and theory of optical instruments, and the greater part of the subject of colour vision. No attempt was made to include these topics, and no apology is needed for their omission. Whatever value these discourses may possess must depend upon the things they include, not upon those which they do not. At the request of the Publishers the author has added a lecture on Radium which he has several times delivered in different places in 1903- 1904, together with the lecture On the Manufacture of Light which was given to a popular audience at the Meeting of the British Associa- tion in the city of York in 1906. London, May 19 10. CONTENTS LECTURE I LIGHT AND SHADOWS How light-waves travel — Experiments with the ripple-tank — How shadows are cast — How to make light -waves converge and diverge — Measurement of brightness of lights — Reflexion of light by mirrors — Formation of images — Regular and irregular reflexion — Diffuse reflexion by paper and rough surfaces — Multiple images — Refraction of light — Lenses — The eye as an optical instrument — Some curious optical experiments — Inver- sion of Images — The magic mirror of Japan — English magic mirrors ......... Page I Appendix — The general method of geometrical optics . . 55 LECTURE II THE VISIBLE SPECTRUM AND THE EYE Colour and wave-length — Rainbow tints — The spectrum of visible colours — Spectrum made by prism — Spectrum made by grat- ing—Composition of white light — Experiments on mixing X LIGHT colours — Analysis of colours — Blue and yellow mixed make white, not green — Complementary tints — Contrast tints pro- duced by fatigue of eye — Other effects of persistence of vision — Zoetrope — Animatograph o . . . . Page 71 Appendix — Anomalous refraction and dispersion . . . 100 LECTURE III POLARISATION OF LIGHT Meaning of polarisation — How to polarise waves of light — Illus- trative models — Polarisers made of glass, of calc-spar, and of slices of tourmaline — How any polariser will cut off polarised light — Properties of crystals — Use of polarised light to detect false gems — Rubies, sapphires, and amethysts — Polarisation by double-refraction — Curious coloured effects, in polarised light, produced by colourless slices of thin crystals when placed between polariser and analyser — Further study of comple- mentary and supplementary tints — Exhibition of slides by polarised light — Effects produced on glass by compression, and by heating ...... o . . 105 Appendix — The elastic-solid theory of light .... 156 LECTURE IV THE INVISIBLE SPECTRUM (ULTRA-VIOLET PART) The spectrum stretches invisibly in both directions beyond the visible part — Below the red end are the invisil)le longer waves that will warm bodies instead of illuminating them — These are called the calorific or infra-red waves. Beyond the violet end of the visible spectrum are the invisible shorter waves that / CONTENTS xi produce chemical efifects — These are called actinic or ultra- violet waves — How to sift out the invisible ultra-violet light from the visible light— How to make the invisible ultra-violet light visible — Use of fluorescent screens — Reflexion, refraction, and polarisation of the invisible ultra-violet light — Luminescence : the temporary kind called Fluorescence, and the persistent kind called Phosphorescence — How to make "luminous paint " — Experiments with phosphorescent bodies — Other pro- perties of invisible ultra-violet light — Its power to diselectrify electrified bodies — Photographic action of visible and of in- visible light — The photography of colours — Lippmann's dis> covery of true colour-photography — The reproduction of the colours of natural objects by trichroic photography — Ives's photochromoscope . ...... Page i6o Appendix — Table of wave-lengths and frequencies , . 190 LECTURE V THE INVISIBLE SPECTRUM (iNFRA-RED PART) How to sift out the invisible mfra-red light from the visible light — Experiments on the absorption and transmission of invisible infra-red light — It is cut off by transparent glass, but trans- mitted by opaque ebonite — Use of radiometer — Use of thermo- pile and bolometer — "Heat-indicating" paint — Experiments on the reflexion, refraction, and polarisation of invisible infra- red light — Discovery by Hertz of propagation of electric waves — Plertzian waves are really gigantic waves of invisible light — Experiments on the properties of Hertzian waves ; their reflexion, refraction, and polarisation — Inference that all light- waves, visible and invisible, are really electric waves of different sizes . . . . . . . . . . 192 Appendix — The electromagnetic theory of light . , . 230 xii LIGHT LECTURE VI RONTGEN LIGHT Rontgen's Discovery — Production of light in vacuum tubes by electric discharges — Exhaustion of air from a tube — Geissler- tube phenomena — The mercurial pump — Crookes's-tube pheno- mena — Properties of Kathode light — Crookes's shadows — De- flection of Kathode light by a magnet — Luminescent and mechanical effects — Lenard's researches on Kathode rays in air — Rontgen's researches — The discovery of X-rays by the lumin- escent effect — Shadows on the luminescent screen— Transpar- ency of aluminium — Opacity of heavy metals — Transparency of flesh and leather — Opacity of bones^ Absence of reflexion, re- fraction, and polarisation — Diselectrifying effects of Rontgen rays — Improvements in PvOntgen tubes — Speculations on the nature of Rontgen light — Seeing the invisible . . Page 238 Appendix — Other kinds of invisible Hght .... 277 LECTURE VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS Emission by certain substances of radiations that will penetrate opaque screens — Properties of uranium salts — The Becquerel rays — Radio-activity— Examination by electroscope — Researches of the Curies — Madame Curie discovers /^olofimm and radium in pitchblende — Experiments with radium — Separation by magnetic field of the three kinds of rays emitted by radium — Strutt's radium clock — Crookes's spinthariscope — Researches of P. Curie on heat emitted by radium, and of Rutherford on disintegration of radium atom . , . . . 2S1 CONTENTS xiii LECTURE VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT Primitive sources of light — Invention of gas-lighting — Invention of electric -lighting — Cause of incandescence — Incandescence by electricity — Luminescence — Luminous efficiency— Photometry — The Photometer — Inequality of distribution of light from lamps — Inequality of composition of lights — The teaching of the spectrum — Spectra of incandescent solids and vapours — Sensi- tiveness of the eye to radiations of particular wave-lengths — Absorption and emission — Measurement of emission — Bad economy of ordinary sources of light — Light of the fire-fly — Temperature, and quality of radiation — Emissivity of the rare earths — High-pressure incandescent gas-lighting — Efficiency of glow-lamps — New kinds of glow-lamps — New kinds of arc- lamps — Electric vapour-lamps — Cost of manufacture of light — Cheapest form of light — Future progress — Sunlight after all Page 302 INDEX 371 LECTURE I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS How light-waves travel — Experiments with the ripple-tank — How shadows are cast — How to make light -waves converge and diverge — Measurement of brightness of lights — Reflexion of light by mirrors — Formation of images — Regular and irregular reflexion — Diff'use reflexion by paper and rough surfaces — Multiple images — Refraction of light— Lenses — The eye as an optical instrument — Some curious optical experiments — Inver- sion of images — The magic mirror of Japan — English magic mirrors. Light, as is known both from astronomical observations and from experiments made with optical apparatus, travels at a speed far exceeding that of the swiftest motion of any material thing. Try to think of the swiftest thing on the face of the earth. An express train at full speed, per- haps, occurs to you. How far will it go while you count up to ten ? Counting distinctly I take just over 5J seconds. In that time an express train would have travelled 500 feet ! Yet a rifle-bullet would have gone farther. There is something that goes quicker than any actual moving thing. A sound travels faster. In the same time a sound would travel a mile. Do you say that a sound is only a movement in the air, a mere aerial B 2 LIGHT LECT. wave ? That is quite true. Sound consists ' of waves, or rather of successions of waves in the air. None of you who may have listened to the delightful lectures of Professor M'Kendrick in this theatre last Christmas will have forgotten that ; or how he used the phonograph to record the actual mechanical movements impressed by those air-waves as they beat against the sensitive surface of the tympanum. But this Christmas we have to deal with waves of a different kind — waves of light instead of waves of sound — and though we are still dealing with waves, yet they are waves of quite a different sort, as we shall see. In the first place, they travel very much faster than waves of sound in the air. During that 5|- seconds, while an express train could go 500 feet, or while a sound would travel a mile, light would travel a million miles ! A million miles ! How shall I get you to think of that distance ? An express train going 60 miles an hour would take 16,666^ hours, which is the same thing as 694 days 10 hours 40 minutes. Suppose you were now — 29th December 1896, 3 o'clock — to jump into an express train, and that it went on and on, not only all day and all night, but all through next year, day after day, and all through the year after next, month after month, until November, and that it did not stop till 24th November 1898 at 20 minutes before 2 o'clock in the morning; by that time — nearly two years — you would have travelled just a million miles. But the space that an express train takes a year and eleven months to travel, light travels in 5 J seconds — just while you count ten ! 1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 3 And not only are the waves of light different from those of sound in their speed — they are different in size. As compared with sound-waves they are very minute ripples. The invisible waves of sound are of various sizes, their lengths differing with the pitch of the sound. The middle c of the pianoforte has a wave-length of about 4 feet 3 inches, while the shrill notes that you can sing may be only a few inches long. A shrill whistle makes invisible ripples about half an inch long in the air. But the waves of light are far smaller. The very largest waves of all amongst the different kinds of visible light — the red waves — are so small that you could pack 39,000 of them side by side in the breadth of one inch ! And the waves of other colours are all smaller. How am I to make you grasp the smallness of these wavelets ? What is the shortest thing you can think of? The thick- ness of a pin ? Well, if a pin is only a hundredth part of an inch thick it is still 390 times as broad as a ripple of red light. The thickness of a human hair? Well, if a hair is only a thousandth part of an inch thick it is still 39 times as big as the size of a wave of red light. Now, from the facts that waves of light travel so fast, and are so very minute, there follow some very important consequences. One consequence is that the to-and-fro motions of these little ripples are so excessively rapid — millions of millions of times in a second — that there is no possible way of measuring their frequency : we can only calculate it. Another consequence is that it is very difficult to demonstrate that they really are waves. While a third consequence of their being so small is 4 LIGHT LECT. that, unlike big waves, they don't spread much round the edges of obstacles. You have doubtless all often watched the waves on the sea, and the ripples on a pond, and know how when the waves or the ripples in their travelling strike against an obstacle, such as a rock or a post, they are parted by it, pass by it, and run round to meet behind it. But when waves of light meet an obstacle of any ordinary size they don't run round and meet on the other side of it — on the contrary, the obstacle casts a shadow behind it. If the waves of light crept round into the space behind the obstacle, that space would not be a dark shadow. Well, but that is a question after all of the relative sizes of the obstacle and of the waves. Sea waves may meet behind a rock or a post, because the rock or the post may not be much larger than the wave-length.^ But if you think of a big stone breakwater — much bigger in its length than the wave-length of the waves, — you know that there may be quite still water behind it ; in that sense it casts a shadow. So again with sound-waves; ordinary objects are not infinitely bigger than the size of ordinary sound-waves. The consequence is that the sound-waves in passing them will spread into the space behind the obstacle. Sounds don't usually cast sharp acoustic shadows. If a band of musicians is playing in front of a house, you don't find, if you go round to the ^ Note that the scientific term " wave-length " means the length from the crest of one wave to the crest of the next. This, on the sea, may be 50 feet or more. In the case of ripples on a pond, it may be but an inch or two. Many people would call it the breadth of the waves rather than the length. I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 5 back of the house, that all sound is cut off. The sounds spread round into the space behind. But if you notice carefully you will observe that while the house does not cut off the big waves of the drum or the trombone, it does perceptibly cut off the smaller waves of the flute or the piccolo. And Lord Rayleigh has often shown in this theatre how the still smaller sound-waves of ex- cessively shrill whistles spread still less into the space behind obstacles. You get sharp shadows when the waves are very small compared with the size of the obstacle. Perhaps you will then tell me that if this argument is correct, you ought not, even with light-waves, to get sharp shadows if you use as obstacles very narrow obstacles, such as needles or hairs. Well, though per- haps you never heard it, that is exactly what is found to be the case. The shadow of a needle or a hair, when light from a single point or a single narrow slit is allowed to fall upon it, is found not to be a hard black shadow. On the contrary, the edges of the shadow are found to be curiously fringed, and there is light right in the very middle of the shadow caused by the waves passing by it, spreading into the space behind and meeting there. However, all this is introductory to the subject of shadows in general. If we don't take special precau- tions, or use very minute objects to cast shadows, we shall not observe any of these curious effects. The ordinary shadows cast by a bright light proceeding from any luminous point are sharp-edged ; in fact, the waves, in ordinary cases, act as though they did not spread into the shadows, but travelled simply in straight lines. 6 LIGHT LECT. Let me try to illustrate the general principle of the <■/ Fig, I. . 1 travelling of ripples by use of a shallow tank of water, ^ Ripple-tanks for illustrating the propagation of waves have long been known. Small tanks were used at various times by Professor Tyndall. See also Professor Poynting, F. R.S., in Nature^ 29th May 1884, p. 1 19. I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 7 on the surface of which I can produce ripples at will. An electric lamp placed underneath it throws up shadows of the ripples upon a slanting translucent screen, and you can see, for yourselves how the ripples spread from the centre of disturbance in concentric circles, each circle enlarging, and the ripples following one after another at regular distances apart. That distance is what we call the "wave-length." If I use the tip of my finger to produce a disturbance, the ripples travel outward in all directions at an equal speed. Each wave-front is therefore a circle. If, however, I use to produce the disturbance a straight wooden ruler, it will set up straight wavelets that follow one another in parallel ranks. These we may describe as plane waves, as distinguished from curved .ones. Notice how they march forward, each keeping its distance from that in front of it. Now, if you have ever watched with care the ripples on a pond, you will know that though the ripples march forward, the water of which these ripples are composed does not — it merely rises up and down as each ripple comes by. The proof is simple. Throw in a bit of cork as a float. If the water were to flow along, it would take the cork with it. But no ; see how the cork rides the waves. It is the motion only that travels forward across the surface — the water simply swings to -and - fro, or rather up and down, in its place. Now that this has once been brought to your attention, you will be able to distinguish between the two kinds of movement — the apparent motion of the waves as they travel along the surface, and the actual motion of the 8 LIGHT LECT. particles in the waves, which is ahvays of an oscillatory kind. Here is a model of a wave-motion that will make the difference still clearer. At the top a row of little white Fig. 2. balls (Fig. 2) is arranged upon stems to which, in regular order one after the other, is given an oscillatory motion up and down. Not one of these white particles travels along, l^^ach simply oscillates in its own place. I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 9 Yet the effect is that of a travelling wave, or rather set of waves. The direction in which the wave travels is transverse to the displacements of the particles. The length from crest to crest of the waves is about 4 inches. Their velocity of travelling depends, of course, on the speed with which I turn the handle of the apparatus. The amplitude of the displacement of each of the balls is not more than one inch up or down from the centre line. Perhaps now you will be able to think of the little wavelets of light, marching in ranks so close that there are 40,000 or 50,000 of them to the inch, and having a velocity of propagation of 185,000 miles a second. Now let me state to you two important principles of wave-motion — all-important in the right understanding of the behaviour of waves of light. (i) The first is that waves always^ march at right angles to their own front. This is how a rank of soldiers march — straight forward in a direction square to the line into which they have dressed. It was so with the water-ripples that you have already seen. (2) The second principle is that every point of any wave-front may be regarded as a new source or centre from which waves will start forward in circles. Look at the sketch (Fig. 3). From P as a centre ripples are travelling outward in circles, for there has been a disturbance at P. Now if there is placed in the way of ^ Always, that is to say, in free media, in gases, liquids, and non-crystalline solids. In crystals, where the structure is such that the elasticity differs in different directions, it is possible to have waves niEtrching obliquely to their own front. lO LIGHT LECT. these ripples a screen, S, or obstacle, with a hole in it, all the wave-fronts that come that way will be stopped or reflected back, except that bit of each wave-front that comes to the gap in the screen. That particular bit will go on into the space beyond, but will spread at equal speed in all directions, giving rise to a new but fainter set of ripples which will be again of circular form, \ \ \ \ • •»» — >■ ' ^^ — > I I >»^ — 5^ - »> > , ^ — > I Fig. 3. having their centre however not at P but at the gap in the screen. This too I can readily illustrate to you in my ripple-tank. The first of these two principles is really a conse- quence of the second, and of anpther principle (that of " interference ") which concerns the overlapping of waves. Of these we may now avail ourselves to find how waves will march if we know at any moment the LIGHTS AND SHADOWS II Fm. 4. shape of the wave -front. Suppose (Fig. 4) we knew that at a certain moment the wave-front of a set of ripples had got as far as the curved hne FF, and that we wanted to know where it would be an instant later. If we know how fast the wave travels we can think of the time taken to travel some short space such as half an inch. Take then a pair of compasses and open them out to half an inch. Then put the point of the compasses at some part — say a — of the curve FF, and strike out the piece of circle as shown at a'. That is where the disturbance would spread to in that short interval of time if the bit of wave-front at a had alone been allowed to spread forward. But the bit at b is also spreading, so we must strike another arc, using b as centre, and another at ^, and another at »>_._ ^1 7K / w \, _^^ Light No. 2 Fig. Either of these two forms of instrument here described is preferable to the old-fashioned "grease-spot" photometer of Bunsen. But both are surpassed in accuracy by the precision -photometer of 20 LIGHT LECT. semi-opaque property of paraffin wax, which results in a diffusion of the light laterally. With this photometer it is very easy to balance the brightness of two lights, even if their tint be not quite identical. In Germany, they employ as standard, instead of a sperm candle, the little Hefner lamp filled with a chemical liquid known as amyl-acetate. But it has — as you see — the serious disadvantage of giving out a light which is unfortunately of a redder tint than most of our other lights. To be quite suitable, the lamp that we choose as a standard of light ought to be not only one that will give out a fixed quantity of light, but one that is irreproachable in the quality of its whiteness : it should be a standard of white light. Perhaps now that acetylene gas is so easily made it may serve as a standard, for as yet none of the proposed electric standards seem quite satisfactory. Let us pass on to the operation of reflecting light by means of mirrocs. A piece of polished metal such as Brodhun and Lummer, which can, however, only be described here very briefly. It gives determinations that can be reHed on to within one-half of one per cent. The two lights to be compared are caused to shine on the two opposite faces of a small opaque white screen, W (Fig. lo). The eye views these two sides, as reflected in two small mirrors, M^^ and M^, by means of a special prism-combination, con- sisting, as shown, of two right-angled prisms of glass, A and B, which are cemented together with balsam over only a small part of their hypotenuse surfaces; the light from M^ can pass direct through this central portion to the eye, but the uncemented portions of the hypotenuse surface of B act by total internal reflexion and bring the light from Mo to the eye. The eye, therefore, virtually sees a patch of one surface of W surrounded by a patch of the other surface of W, and hence can judge very accurately as to whether they are equally illuminated or not. LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 21 silver, or a silvered glass, will reflect the waves of light, and so, though in an inferior degree, will any other material if only its surface be sufficiently smooth. By sufficiently smooth I mean that the ridges or scratches or roughnesses of its surface are decidedly smaller than the wave-length of the light. If the scratches or ridges on a surface are in width less than a quarter of the wave- length (in the case of light, therefore, less than about 2o"Fooo inch) they do not cause any breaking up of the waves ; and such surfaces are, for optical purposes, quite "smooth." Indeed that is the usual way of polishing things. You scratch them all over with some sort of very fine powder that makes scratches finer than of an inch. 20^000 Now the rebound of waves when they beat against a polished surface, whether that surface be a flat one or a curved one, can be studied by applying the same principles of wave-motion that we have already learned. In Fig. II we have light starting from a point at P and 22 LIGHT LECT. spreading. If a smooth obstacle, SS, is placed in the path of these waves they will meet it, but some parts of the wave-front will meet it before other parts. Think of the bit of the wave-front that meets the mirror at a. If it had not been stopped, it would after a brief moment of time have got as far as a . But having bounded back from the surface it will set up a wavelet that will spread backwards at the same rate. Therefore, draw with your compasses the wavelet d\ using as radius the length a a. The next bit of the wave -front b reaches the surface of the mirror a little later. The length from thence to b' is therefore a little shorter than a a. So take that shorter length as radius and strike out the wavelet b" . Completing the set of wavelets in the same way we get the final curve of the reflected wave, which you see will now march backwards as though it had come from some point Q on the other side of the mirror. In fact, if the mirror is a flat one, Q will be exactly as far behind the surface as P is in front of it. We call the point Q tlie "image" of the point P. This reflexion of ripples as though they had come from a point behind the mirror I can show you by aid of my ripple-tank. I put in a flat strip of lead to serve as a reflector — see how the waves as they come up to it march off with their curvature reversed, as though they had started from some point behind the reflecting surface. Again I can show you the same thing with a candle and a looking-glass. You know that we can test the direction in which light is coming by looking at the direction in which a shadow is cast by it. If I set up 1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 23 (Fig. 12) this little dagger on a whitened board I can see which way its shadow falls. If now I place a candle beside it on the board at P it casts a shadow of the dagger on the side away from P. Next, set up a piece of silvered mirror glass a little farther along the board. We have now two shadows. One is the direct shadow which was previously cast ; the other is the shadow cast by the waves that have been reflected in the mirror, and Fig. you see by the direction in which this second shadow falls that it falls just as if the light had come from a second candle placed at Q, just as far behind the mirror as P is in front. Let us put an actual second candle at Q, and then take away the mirror, and you see the second shadow in the same place and of the same shape as before. So we have proved by direct experiment that our reasoning about the waves was correct. Indeed, 24 LIGHT LECT. you have only to look into a flat mirror, and examine the images of things in it, to satisfy yourselves about the rule. The images of objects are always exactly opposite the objects, and are each as far behind the mirror as the object is in front. Probably you have all heard of the savage prince captured by sailors, who, when he was taken on board ship and shown a mirror hanging on a wall, wanted to run round to see the other savage prince whom he saw on the other side ! If instead of using flat mirrors we use curved ones, w^e find different rules to be observed. That is because the curved surfaces print new curvatures on the wave- fronts, causing them to alter their lines of march. There are, as you know, tw^o sorts of curvatures. The surface may bulge out — ^in which case we call it convex ; or it may be hollowed — in which case we call it a concave surface. In my ripple tank I now place a curved piece of metal with its bulging side toward the place where I make the ripples. Suppose now I send a lot of plane ripples to beat against this surface ; the part of the wave-front that strikes first against the bulging curve is the earliest to be reflected back. The other parts strike the surface later, and when reflected back have fallen behind ; so that the ripples come back curved — the curved mirror has, in fact, imprinted upon the ripples a curvature twice as great as its own curvature. This can be seen from Fig. 13, where we consider the straight ripples marching to meet the bulging reflector. The middle point M of the bulging surface meets the advan- LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 25 cing wave first and turns that bit back. If there had been no obstacle the wave would, after a short interval of time, have got as far as A. But where will it actually go to ? The bit that strikes M will go back as far as B ; the bit marked a will go on a little, and then be reflected back. Take C your compasses again and measure the dis- tance it still has to go to a ^ and then turn- ing the compasses strike out the arc a. Do the same for the bits marked b and c, and you will find the overlapping wavelets Fig. 13. to give you the new outline of the reflected wave, which marches backwards as though it had started from the point marked F. This point F is half-way between M and the centre of curvature of the surface. The centre is marked C in the drawing. So, again, if I use as reflector a hollow or concave- curved surface, it will imprint upon the waves a concave form, the imprinted curvature being twice as great as the curvature of the reflecting surface. But now we come upon a new effect. See in my ripple-tank how, when the straight ripples beat against the concave surface, so that the middle part of the wave-front is the last to rebound, all the other parts have already re- bounded and are marching back, the returning ripples being curved inwards. In fact, you see that, being 26 LIGHT LECT. themselves now curved ripples with hollow wave-fronts, they converge inwards upon one another, and march back toward the point F. A bit of the wave -front at P marches straight until it strikes the mirror at R. Then instead of going on to Q it is reflected inward and travels to F, toward which point other parts of the wave also travel. Here then we have found a real focus or meeting point of the waves ; not, as in the preceding cases, a virtual focus from which the waves seemed to Fig. 14. come. We have then learned that, for ripples at least, a concave mirror may produce a real convergence to a point. Let us at once show that the same thing can be done with light-waves by using a concave silvered mirror. From my optical lantern, with its internal electric lamp, my assistant causes a broad beam of light to stream forth. The air is dusty, and each little particle of dust catches a portion of the beam, and helps you to see which way it is marching. Li this beam I hold a eoSTON COLlf«E » >BKAK\ CHESTNUT HJLL. MASS. LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 27 concave silvered mirror. At once you see how by print- ing a curvature upon the waves it forces the beam to converge (Fig, 15) upon a point here in mid-air. That point is the focus. You will further notice that by turning the mirror about I can shift the position of the Fig. 15. focus, and concentrate the waves in different places at will. If I replace the concave mirror by a convex one, I shall cause a divergence of the waves. No longer is there any real focus, but the waves now march away as if they had come from a virtual focus behind the mirror at F (Fig. 16), precisely as we saw for the ripples in the ripple-tank. We have now got as far as the making of real images < r* 28 LIGHT LECT. by so changing the shapes of the wave-fronts and their consequent Unes of march as to cause them to converge to focal points. Let us try a few more experiments on the formation of images. Removing from the optical lantern all its lenses, let us simply leave inside it the electric lamp. You know that in this lamp there are two pencils of carbon, the tips of which do not quite touch, and Fig. 16. which are made white-hot by the flow of the electric current between them. I cover up the opening in front of the lantern by a piece of tin-foil, and in this I now stab a small round hole with a pointed stiletto. At once you see thrown on the screen an image (Fig. 17) of the two white-hot tips of the carbon pencils. The positive carbon has a flat end, the negative tip is pointed. That image is inverted as a matter of fact, and its forma- tion on the screen is a mere consequence of the rectilinear JHUdTOi^ COLLEGE LIBJialtV . CMMTOUT HaL, MAm I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 29 propagation of the light. If I stab another hole we shall have another image. This time I have pierced a square hole, but the second image is just the same as the first, and does not depend on the shape of the hole. I pierce again a three-cornered hole — still another image. If I pierce a whole lot of holes I get just as many images, and they are arranged in a sort of pattern, which exactly corresponds to the pattern of holes I have pierced in the tin-foil. Now if I wanted to produce one single bright image instead of a lot of little images scattered about, I must in Fig. 17- some way manage so to turn these various beams that they shall all converge upon the same region of the screen. In other words, the formation of bright images can be effected by using some appliance which will imprint a convergence upon the waves. You know that a concave mirror will do this. . Very well, let me use a concave mirror. See how, when we choose one of the proper curvature to converge the light upon the screen, it blends all the images together, and gives us one bright image. We may remove our tin-foil cap altogether, so as to work 3© LIGHT LECT. with the whole beam, and we get a still more brilliant image of the carbon points. Substituting for the arc-lamp a group of little coloured electric glow-lamps, I cause their beams to be reflected out into the room by my concave mirror, and here, by trying with a hand -screen of thin translucent paper, you see how I can find the real image of the group of lamps. This image is inverted ; and being in this case formed at a distance from the mirror greater than that of the object, it is magnified. If the object is removed to a greater distance the image comes still nearer in ; and is then of diminished size, though still inverted. So far we have been dealing with the regular reflexion that takes place at properly polished surfaces. But if the surfaces are not properly polished — that is, if their ridges or scratches or roughnesses are not sensibly smaller than the size of waves, then, though they may still reflect, the reflexion is irregular. White paper reflects in this diffuse way. You do not get any definite images, because the slight roughnesses of the texture break up the wave-fronts and scatter them in all directions. That is why a white sheet of paper looks white from whichever aspect you regard it. If the substance is one which, like silk, has a definite fibre or grain that reflects a little better in one direction than in another, then the quantity of light reflected will depend partly upon the direction in which the grain catches the light, and partly upon the angle at which the light is inclined to the surface. This is easily demonstrated by examining the appearance of a piece of metal electrotyped in exact facsimile of a piece of silk fabric. Here is such a I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 31 piece. It was deposited ^ in a gutta-percha mould cast upon a piece of figured silk brocade ; it reproduces the exact shimmer of silk, because it reproduces the grain of the silk in its operation of partial reflexion. If silk is woven with warp of one colour and weft of another, the different colours are better reflected at certain angles — hence the effect produced by "shot" silk. To illustrate the property of diffuse reflexion let me show you two simple experiments. Here is a piece of mirror. Upon it I paint with Chinese white the word LIGHT. The letters look white on a dark background. But if I use it to reflect upon the wall a patch of light from the electric lamp the letters come out black. The light that fell on those parts was scattered in all direc- tions — so those parts looked white to you, but they have diffused the waves instead of directing them straight to the wall as the other smooth parts of the surface do. Let me prove to you how much light is really reflected from a piece of paper. I have merely to shine my lamp upon this piece of white paper, and hold it near the cheek of this white marble bust for you to see for yourselves what an amount of light it actually reflects upon the object. Exchanging the white paper for a ^ Made at the Technical College, Finsbury, by Mr. E. Rousseau, instructor in electro-deposition. His process of casting, in a molten compound of gutta-percha, the matrices, which are afterwards metal- lised to receive the deposit in the electrotype bath, is distinctly superior to the commercial process of taking moulds in a hydraulic press. On one occasion he took for me a mould of a Rowland's diffraction grating, having 14,400 parallel lines to the inch. Like the original it showed most gorgeous diffraction colours. 32 LIGHT LECT. piece of red paper, — that is to say of paper that reflects red waves better than waves of any other colour, — and you see how the red light is thrown back upon the bust, and brings an artificial blush to its cheek. If light is reflected from one mirror to another one standing at an angle with the first, two or more images Fig. i8. may be formed, according to the position of the mirrors. Here (Fig. i8) are two flat mirrors hinged together like the leaves of a book. If I open them out to an angle equal to one-third of a circle — namely, 120° — and then place a candle between them, each mirror will make an image, so that, when you peep in between the mirrors, there will seem to be three candles. If I fold the mirrors a little nearer, so that they enclose a quadrant of a circle I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 33 — or are at right angles — then there will seem to be four candles, one real one and three images. If I shut the angle up to 72° — or one-fifth of a circle — then there will seem to be five candles. Or to 60° — one-sixth of a circle — then there appear six candles. This is the principle of the toy called the Kaleidoscope^ with which some most beautiful and curious combinations of patterns and colours can be obtained by the multiplication of images. Even with two such mirrors as these some quaint effects are possible. When nearly shut up, a single light between them seems to be drawn out into a whole ring of images. Open them out to 72° or to a right angle, and try the effect of putting your two. hands sud- denly between the mirrors. Ten hands or eight hands (according to the angle chosen) simultaneously appear as if by magic. Place between the mirrors a wedge of Christmas cake, and shut up the mirrors till they touch the sides of the wedge, — you will see a whole cake appear. It is now time to pass on to another set . of optical effects which depend upon the rate at which the waves travel. I have told you how fast they travel in the air — 186,400 miles a second, or (if you will calculate it out by a reduction sum) one foot in about the thousand- millionth part of one second. Well, but light does not go quite so fast through water as through air — only about three-fourths as fast ; that is, it goes in water only at the rate of about 138,000 miles a second, or only about nine inches in the thousand-millionth part of a second. And in common glass it goes still slower. On the average — for glasses differ in their com.position, and 34 LIGHT LECT. therefore in the retardation they produce on light-waves — Hght only goes about two-thirds as fast as in air. That is, while light would travel one foot through air, it would only travel about eight inches through glass. Now as a consequence of this difference in speed it follows quite simply that if the waves strike obliquely against the surface of water or of glass that part of the wave-front that enters first into the denser medium goes more slowly, and the other part which is going on for a little longer time though air gains on the part that entered first, and so the direction of the wave-front is changed, and the line of march is also changed. Let us study it a little more precisely. If waves of light I proceeding from a point ^% P strike against the top ; \\ surface of a block of glass, as in Fig. 19, how will the retardation that they experience on enter- ing affect their march ? Suppose that at a certain moment a ripple has got as far as FF'. If it had been going on through air it would, after a very short interval of time, have got as far as GG'. But it has struck against the glass, and the part that goes in first instead of going as far as G' will only get two-thirds as far. So once more take your compasses, and strike off a set of arcs for the various wavelets, in each case taking as the arc two -thirds of the dis- I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 35 tance that the Ught would have had to go if after passing the surface it could have gone on to GG'. The overlapping wavelets build up the new wave-front HG', which you notice is a flatter curve, and has its centre somewhere farther back at Q. In fact, the effect of the glass in retarding the wave is to flatten its curvature and alter its march, so that in going on through the glass it will progress as though it had come not from P, but from Q, a point i|- times as far away. Consider the bit of wave-front that has been marching down the line PG'. When it enters the ' glass its line of march is changed — instead of going on along G'A it goes more steeply down G'B, as though it had come from Q. This abrupt change of direction along a broken path, caused by the entrance into a denser ^ medium, is known by the term refraction. Glass refracts more than water does ; heavy crystal glass (containing lead) refracts more than the light sorts of glass used for window-panes and bottles; while many other substances have a still higher refrac- tivity. Now, we can use this property of the refracting sub- stances to produce convergence and divergence of light- waves, because, as you see, when we want to imprint a curvature on the wave-fronts, we can easily do this by using the retardation of water or of glass. Suppose we wanted to alter a plane-wave so as to make it converge to a focus, what we have got to do is to retard the middle part of the wave-front a little, so that the other ^ "Denser," in its optical sense, means the same thing as more retarding. Compare with what is said on p. 62 in the Appendix to this Lecture. 36 LIGHT LECT. parts shall gain on it. It will then be concave in shape, and therefore will march to a focus. What sort of a piece of glass will do this ? A mere window-pane wil^ not. A thick slab will not, seeing it is equally thick all over. Clearly it must be a piece of glass that is thicker at one part than another. Well, suppose w^e take a piece of glass that is thicker in the middle than at the edges, what will it do ? Suppose that, as in Fig. 20, we have some plane-waves coming along, and that we put in their path a piece of glass that is flat on one face and bulging on the other face. Think of the time when a wave-front has arrived at GG. A moment later where will it be ? The middle part that strikes at M will be going through glass to B. This distance MB we know will be only two-thirds as great as the distance to which it would go in air. Had it gone on in air it would have gone as far as A, the length MA being drawn ij times as great as MB. The edge parts of the wave-front go almost wholly through air, and will gain on the middle part. So the new wave-front, instead of being flat through HAH, will be curved concavely in the shape HBH ; 1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 37 and as a result the wave will march on converging to meet at F in a real focus.^ It would be the same if the piece of glass were turrj^d round the other way, with its bulging face toward the light ; it would still imprint a concavity on the advancing wave and make it converge to a focus. This is exactly how a burning-glass acts. With my ripple -tank I am able to imitate these effects, but not very accurately, because the only way I have of slowing the ripples is to make the water shal- lower where retardation is to be produced. This I do by inserting a piece of plate glass cut to the proper shape. Where the ripples pass over the edge of the submerged piece of glass they travel more slowly. Where they meet* the edge obliquely the direction of their march is changed — they are refracted. Where they pass over a lens- shaped piece they are converged toward a focus. It is, however, more convincing to show these things with light-waves themselves. Let me first show you refraction upon the optical circle by the aid (Fig. 21) of a special apparatus ^ for directing the beam toward the centre at any desired angle. Placing a large optical circle with its face toward you and its back to the lantern, I can throw the light obliquely upon the top surface of ^ From Fig. 20 it is easy to see that the curvature of the im- pressed HAH is just half (if MB = § MA) of the curvature of the glass surface. Hence it follows that the focal length of the plano- convex lens (if of glass having a refractivity of I J) is equal to twice the radius of curvature of the lens-surface. In the case of double- convex lenses, each face imprints a curvature upon the wave as it passes through. See Appendix to Lecture I. p. 65. ^ This apparatus, which can be fitted to any ordinary lantern, consists of three mirrors at 45° carried upon an arm affixed to a 38 LIGHT LECT. a piece of glass, the under surface of which has been ground to a semi-cylinder (jj^ig. 22). The refracted beam emerges at a differ- ent angle, its line of march having been made more steeply oblique by the retardation of the glass. If you measure the angles not in degrees but by the straight distances across the circle, you will find that, for the kind of glass I am using, the proportion between the length CD (the sleeve that fits the condenser-tube, as in Fig. 21. The beam after three reflexions comes radially back across the axis of the con- FlG. 22. densers ; and by turning the arm around in the condenser-tube can be used at any angle. LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 39 sine of refraction) and the length AB (the sine of inci- dence) is ahvays just the proportion of 2 to 3, whatever the obliquity of the incident beam. When the incident beam falls at grazing incidence most of it is reflected and never enters the glass, and the part that does enter is refracted down at an angle known as the critical or limiting angle. With this same optical circle I am able to show you another phenomenon, that of total internal re- flexion. If I send the light upwards through the glass hemisphere (Fig. 23), at an angle beyond that of the critical angle, none of it will come up through the surface ; all will be reflected inter- nally at the under side, the top surface acting as a polished mirror. You can see the same effect with a tumbler full of water with a spoon in it. This same phenomenon of total reflexion can be beautifully illustrated by the luminous cascade or fairy fountain. I allow water to stream out of a nozzle, and shine light in behind through a window into the cistern from which the water flows. It falls in a parabolic curve, the light following it internally down to the place where the jet breaks (Fig. 24) into drops. Total reflexion can also be illustrated by shining light into one end of a solid glass rod, along whichp Fig. 23. 40 LIGHT LECT. though it is of a bent and crooked shape, the light travels until it comes to the other end. Returning now to the use of lenses to cause the waves to converge and diverge, we will adjust our lan- tern to send out a straight beam, and then interpose in Fig. 24. the path a lens made of glass thicker in the middle than at the edges. At once it is observed — thanks to the dust in the air — to make these waves converge to a focus at F (Fig. 25). This is again a real focus. A lens that is thus thicker in the middle than at the edges is called a convex k?is. Had we taken a piece of glass that is thinner in the 1 LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 41 middle than at the edges — a concave lens — the effect Fig. 25 would be the opposite. Since the thin middle retards the mid parts of the wave-front less than the thick glass Fig. 26. edges retard the edge parts, the middle part of the 42 LIGHT LECT. wave-front will gain on the outlying parts, and the wave will emerge as a bulging wave, and will therefore march as if diverging from some virtual focus. You will not have failed to note that this property of lenses to converge or diverge light depends on the fact that light travels slower in glass than in air ; and you will perhaps wonder what would be the effect if there were no change in the speed of travelling. Well, that is a very simple matter to test. If the action of the lens depends upon the difference of speed of light in the glass and in the surrounding medium, what ought to be the result of surrounding the glass lens with some other medium than air ? Suppose we try water. The speed of light in water is less than in air — it is more nearly like that in glass. And if the action depends on differ- ence of speed, then a glass lens immersed in water ought to have a less action than the same glass lens in air. Try it, and you see at once that when immersed in water a magnifying glass does not magnify as much as it does in air. A burning-glass does not converge the rays so much when immersed in water ; its focus is farther away. Nay, I have here a lens which you see unquestionably magnifies. I immerse it in this bath of oil — and behold it acts as a minifying lens — it makes the beam diverge instead of converge ! Carry the argument on to its logical conclusion. If the effect of the medium is so important, what would be the effect of taking a lens of air (enclosed between two thin walls of glass) and surrounding it by a bath of water or oil ? If the reasoning is right, a concave air lens in oil ought to act like a convex glass lens in air, and a convex air LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 43 ^^^t£ --^^- ~_~_" -——j^— .__^™,^ "^- --- ^ ~-J- g -'--t. >r- Ls^^gs^r^; -:=^ h Fig. 27. lens in oil like a concave glass lens in air. Let us put it to the test of experiment. Here is a concave air lens. In air it neither converges nor diverges .the light — the speed inside and outside the lens is the same — therefore there is no action. But plunge it in oil (Fig. 27) and, see, it brings the beam to a focus --_ i[-:-vJ-t".-:-."Ji-:::-i'"-^>p (F) exactly as a convex glass lens in air would do. Let me sum up this part of my subject by simply saying that lenses and curved mirrors can change the march of light-waves by imprinting new curvatures on the wave-fronts. Indeed, speaking strictly, that is all that any lens or mirror, or combination of lenses or of mirrors, can do. Now the human eye, that most wonderful of all optical instruments, is a combination of lenses within a cartilaginous ball, the back of which is covered on its inner face with an exquisitely fine structure of sensitive cells, through which are distributed ramifications of the optic nerve. All that that nerve can do is to feel the impressions that fall upon it and convey those impres- sions to the brain. All else must be done on the one hand by the lens-apparatus that focuses the waves of light on the retina, or on the other hand by the brain that is conscious of the impressions conveyed to it. With neither the nerve-structures nor with the brain are these lectures concerned. We have merely to treat of the eye as a combination of lenses that focuses images on the retina. 44 LIGHT LECT. Consider a diagram (Fig. 28) of the structures of the human eyeball. The greater part of the refractive effect is accomplished by a beautiful piece of trans- parent horny substance known as the crystalline lens (L^), which is situated just behind the iris or coloured diaphragm of the eye. The pupil, or hole through the iris, leads straight toward the middle of this crystalline C the cornea. R the retina. N the optic nerve. Li aqueous humour. L2 the crystalline lens. L3 vitreous humour. i the iris diaphragm. b the blind spot. y the yellow spot, or 7na- cula lutea. Fig. 28. lens. But it is immersed in a medium, or rather between two media, a watery medium (L ) in front and a gelatin- ous one (L ) behind ; the latter filling up the rest of the globe of the eyeball. The crystalline lens has therefore a less magnifying power than it would have if it were immersed in air. It acts very much as a lens in water. But the watery liquid in front of it also acts as a lens, since it occupies the space in front of the crystalline lens and between it and the trans- I LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 45 parent cornea^ the bulging window of the eye. Taken together these form a lens - combination adapted to form images upon that back-screen or retina^ R, where are spread out the sensitive nerve structures. All that the eye can do as an optical instrument can be imitated by optical combinations of lenses. An ordinary photographic camera may be regarded as a sort of artificial eye. In front is a combination of lenses the function of which is to focus images upon a back screen, or upon a plate which is made chemically sensitive. To make the analogy more complete one ought to think of the eye as a kind of camera in which the hollow body is filled up with a thin transparent watery jelly, and in which also the space between the front lens and the one behind it is full of water. Apart from the complication introduced by the watery and gelatinous media, it is very easy to imitate the optical arrangements of the eye by lenses. Any photographic camera will serve indeed for the purpose. Its lens combination throws upon the screen at the back real images of the objects placed in front. As in the camera, so in the eyeball, the images thrown on the back are inverted images. If you have not thought of this before it seems hard to believe it : nevertheless it is true. You have all your lives had the images inverted. Your brains, while you were yet babies learned to associate the impression received on the lower part of the retina with objects high above you. However you may explain or doubt, the facts are simply what they are : the images are upside-down at the back of your eyeball. 46 LIGHT I,ECT. Beside the general proof afforded by camera-images, there are two extremely simple proofs of this fact. The first any of you can try at home ; all the apparatus it needs being a common pin and a bit of card. It depends upon the circumstance that if you hold a small object close to a lens a shadow of it may be cast right through the lens without being turned upside down. Here is a lens — it will form inverted images of objects if it focuses them on a screen. But hold a small object close to the lens (Fig. 29) and shine light through it ; the shadows are actually cast right side up on the screen. Now take a visiting-card and prick a pinhole through it with a large- sized pin. Place this hole about an inch from the eye and look through it at a white cloud or a white surface strongly illuminated. Then hold the pin upright, as in Fig. 30, between the eye and the pinhole. It may require a little patience to see it, as the pin must be held exactly in the right place. You know you are holding it with the head up, yet you see it with its head down, looking as in Fig. 31. Now if in the case where you know that its shadow is being thrown upright on the back of your eye you feel the shadow upside down, it follows that when you feel any image right way up it must really be an in- verted image that you are feeling. The other proof has the merit of being direct and objective, but does not succeed with every eye — some Fig. 29. i LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 47 persons have the cartilaginous walls of the eyeballs too thick. Stand in front of a mirror, close one eye — say the right — and hold a candle in the hand on the same side. Hold the candle about at the level of the closed eye so that its light just falls across the bridge of the nose into the open eye. Then if you look very carefully you will see, right in the extreme corner of the eye, shining dimly through the cartilaginous white wall, a small ^^'^' 2^- image of the candle flame — and it is inverted. If you 48 LIGHT LECT. raise the candle higher, the image goes down ; if you lower the candle, the image rises. Leaving lenses let me show you a couple of interesting experiments depending on the property of refraction that we have been discussing. In passing through the earth's atmosphere obliquely, as they do when the sun is low down near the horizon, the sun's rays are refracted, and he seems to be a little higher up in the sky than he really is. Indeed, under certain circumstances, the sun can be seen above the horizon at a time when it is absolutely certain that he has really set ; his rays in that case come in a curved path over the intervening portion of the globe. Now the circum- stances in which this can occur are these — that the successive strata of the air must be of different densities ; the densest below, next the earth, and the less dense above. To demonstrate this I will take a glass tank into which there have been carefully poured a number of solutions of chloride of calcium in water of different densities — the densest at the bottom. You note that the beam of light sent into the ' ^ ' trough takes a curved path (Fig. 32). In fact, the light turns round a corner. The difference of refractivity that accompanies difference of density is well shown by a very simple experiment upon heated air. You all know that when air is heated it rises, becoming less dense. You all know that, when cooled, air becomes more dense, and tends to fall. But did you ever see the hot air rising LIGHTS AND SHADOWS 49 from your hand, or even from a hot poker? Or did you ever see the cold air descending below a lump of ice? This is exceedingly easy to show you. All I require is a very small luminous point. We will take the light of an arc-lamp, shining through a small hole in a metal diaphragm close to it, and let it shine on the white wall. Now I let this hot poker cast its shadow on the screen, and you see torrents of hot air, which rising, cast their shadows also. Here is a lump of ice. The cold air streaming down from it casts its shadow. Even from my hand you see the hot air rising. A candle flame casts quite a dense shadow, and when I open a bottle of ether you see the ether vapour — which is ordinarily quite invisible — streaming out of the neck and falling down. Even a jet of escaping gas reveals itself when examined by this method. Another curious experiment consists in using as a lens a piece of glass which has been ground so as to be curved only one way — say right and left — but not curved in the other way. If this lens is thicker in the middle part from top to bottom, as in Fig. 33, than it is at the two edges, it will magnify things from right to left, but not from top to bottom; hence • Fig 'X'x It produces a distortion. I throw upon the screen the portrait of a well-known old gentle- man. Then if I interpose in front of him one of these "cylindrical " lenses, his face will be distorted. And if I then turn the lens round the distortion will alternately elongate his features and broaden them. There are E 50 LIGHT LECT. also cylindrical lenses of another kind, thinner in the middle than at the edges. These produce a distortion by minifying. Finally, I return to the point which I endeavoured to explain to you a few minutes ago, that all that any lens or mirror can do is to impress a curvature upon the wave-fronts of the waves. The most striking proof of this is afforded by that now rare curiosity the magic mirror of Japan. In old Japan, before it was invaded and degraded by Western customs, many things were different from what they now are. The Japs never sat on chairs — there were none to sit upon. They had no looking-glasses — their mirrors were all of polished bronze ; and, indeed, those interesting folk had carried the art of bronze-casting and of mirror polishing to a pitch never reached in any other nation before them. The young ladies in Japan when they were going to do up their hair used to squat down on a beautiful mat before a lovely mirror standing on an elegant lacquered frame. Fig. 34 is photographed from a fine Japanese drawing in my possession. You may have seen pretty little Yum-yum in the "Mikado" squat down exactly so before her toilet-table. Here (Fig. 35) is one of these beautiful Japanese mirrors, round, heavy, and furnished with a metal handle. One face has been polished with care and hard labour ; the other has upon it in relief the ornament cast in the mould — in this case the crest of the imperial family, the kiri leaf (the leaf of the Paullonia imperialis) with the flower-buds appearing over it. The polished face is very slightly convex ; but on looking into it none of you young A Fig. 34 —Japanese Girls with Mirrors- >. ^ ,_^ a , is X/***j*^ ' 112 LIGHT LECT. ether-waves. When any one particle gets a sudden jolt it quivers, and gives out a vibration, which we may represent by the curve (Fig. 68), with a lot of little wave- lets each like its fellow, per- haps several thousands ^ of them before they die away. ^^°" ^^' Each such vibration would die away like the note of a piano -string struck and left to itself. But perhaps before the motion has died away another jolt sets it off vibrating in a new direc- tion, again to die away. Suppose millions of these little particles, all jostling, and vibrating, and sending out trains of wavelets. It is clear that one ought to expect the utmost admixture of wave-sizes and directions of vibration in the resultant light. Then, you understand, that as natural light is not polarised in any particular direction, if we want to get polarised light we must do something to it to polarise it. But how ? ^ According to the researches of Fizeau, at least 50,000, on the average, in ordinary light. Prof. Michelson's more recent experi- ments, in which he has obtained interference between two waves the paths of which differed by more than 20 cm. or 1,000,000 wave- lengths, prove that the average number of wavelets in each train must be reckoned in millions. [Table in POLARISATION OF LIGHT 113 Table III. — Polarisers Principle. Nature of Apparatus. Reference. By Reflexion . . -j By Refraction . < By Double Refraction < By Double Refraction, \ with Absorption . / By Double Refraction, \ with Internal Reflexion j I. IL in. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Black glass at about 57° Delezenne's Polariser . Glass sheet at about 57° Bundle of thin glass sheets set obliquely Rhomb of Iceland Spar Double-image Prism . Slice of Tourmaline . Nicol's Prism and its modei'n Varieties (p. 153)- (p. 123)- (P- 154)- (p. 154). (p. 120). (p. 125). (p. 119). (p. 121). In Table IIL I have set down some eight different ways of polarising, which we will presently consider in their order. But before we deal with any of them, let us go back to the vibrations of cords and see how they can be polarised. Here (Fig. 69) is an indiarubber cord passing through a wooden box with vertical partitions. These partitions limit the movements and only allow vertical vibrations to pass through. If I vibrate the cord in any way, it is only the vertical components of the vibration that suc- ceed in getting through. The waves, after passing through the box, come out polarised in a vertical plane. If I turn the box over on its side (Fig. 70) it will now transmit only horizontal components of vibration. What will happen, then, if I pass the cord through a second box, as in Fig, 70 ? That depends on the positions of the boxes. If the first one P is set with its partitions 114 LIGHT LECT. vertical, it will polarise the waves vertically, and as these waves travel on they will come to the second box marked Ill POLARISATION OF LIGHT 115 A. If this also has its partitions vertical, the vertical waves will get through it also. If both boxes are turned over on their side, then the first one will polarise the waves horizontally, and the horizontally polarised waves will pass through both boxes. But if I have the first box P set vertically and the second box A horizontally (Fig. 71), P will polarise the vibrations so that they will not get through A, but will be cut off. However P is placed it will polarise the waves ; if A is turned so as to cross the waves they will be cut off. Upon the lecture table is another model which illus- trates the same set of facts more fully. If you under- stand it you will have no difficulty in understanding the optical apparatus that we are going to use. In this apparatus the vibrations of a thin silk cord — best seen by those in front of the table — are produced by attach- ing one end to the prong of a tuning-fork, the vibrations of which are maintained by an electromagnetic attach- ment. To the distant end of the cord is attached a small weight, which has been so adjusted that the cord is thrown into stationary waves. In brief, the vibrations of the cord are tuned to those of the fork. To polarise the vibrations, the motions of the cord are confined by means of a pair of glass plates mounted in wooden cylinders (Figs. 72, 73). At the first nodal point of the cord the first pair of glass plates acts as a polariser, P ; the cord beyond that point vibrating in the plane thus imposed upon it. A pointer fixed upon the wooden cylinder shows the direction of the plane of polarisation.^ The second ^ Concerning the term, "plane of polarisation," see remarks in Appendix to this Lecture, p. 158. ii6 LIGHT LECT. 0."= ^^m pair of glass plates is set at the second nodal point to act as an analyser^ A. The vibrations of the cord Ill POLARISATION OF LIGHT 117 are made vertical by the polariser P, and when the plane of the analyser A is also vertical (as in Fig. 72) the vibrations which pass through the polariser pass through the analyser also. But, if (as in the previous experiment with the boxes) the analyser is turned round a quarter, so that the slit between the glass plates lies across the vibrations (as in Fig. 73) the vibrations are no longer transmitted. To recapitulate, the vibrations are tra?ismitted when the polariser and analyser are parallel to one another : but are cut off and extinguished when polariser and analyser are crossed. Hence, by turning round the analyser to such a position that it cuts off the vibrations we can ascertain with accuracy ^ the direction of the vibrations proceeding from the polariser. But why should we linger longer upon mere models when we can operate with light - waves themselves ? My assistant throws upon the screen a beam of white light from the electric lamp within the optical lantern. He now places in the path of the beam a large polariser, P (Fig. 74). What this polariser is, I will presently explain. He now sets it so that it polarises the light, allowing to fall upon the screen those waves only whose vibrations are executed in a vertical plane. The white disk of light on the screen consists, in fact, of up-and- down light only. Your eye would not tell you whether the light was vibrating up and down, or even that it was ^ The model will enable the orientation of the plane of the vibra- tions to be determined to within about half a degree of angle. That is, if the analyser is as much as half a degree out of the crossed position, the vibrations are not completely extinguished. ii8 LIGHT LECT. polarised at all. To ascertain that the waves are really polarised we must have recourse to an analyser. This analyser, A, is itself simply a smaller polariser. In order that you may see it the better it is mounted (see Fig. 75) by thin strings upon a ring - support, the shadow of which you see on the screen. If this is also set in the proper position to transmit up-and- down vibrations, the polarised light will come through Fig. 74. it, both polariser and analyser being clear as glass. If now the analyser A is turned round one quarter it will, though clear as glass, entirely cut off the up-and-down vibrations, with the result (Fig. 76) that no light gets through it. This cutting off of the light by turning the analyser one quarter round proves that the light was polarised. When the planes of polariser and analyser are parallel to one another — both vertical, or both horizontal, — then we have the "bright field" of trans- mitted light. When the planes of polariser and analyser Ill POLARISATION OF LIGHT 119 then are crossed — one vertical, the other horizontal the light is cut off, and we have the "dark field." There is a gem called the tourmaline which, when cut into thin slices, has the property of polarising light. This gem^ is often found of a dark green colour, but also of brown, dark blue, and even ruby tint. Into the beam of ordinary white light now cast upon the screen Fig. 75. Fig. 76. there is now introduced a thin slice of brown tourmaline (Fig. 77). It looks dark, for it cuts off more than half the light. But such light as succeeds in getting through is polarised — the vibrations being parallel to the longer dimension of the slice. A second thin slice of tourmaline is now introduced, and superposed over the first. When they are parallel to one another light comes through both of them (Fig. 78). But if one of them is now ^ The dark green tourmaline is also sometimes called the Brazilian emerald, though it is of entirely different composition from an emerald. The bishops of the South American Catholic churches wear tourmalines in their episcopal rings, instead of emeralds. I20 LIGHT LECT. turned round, so that they are crossed, as in Fig. 79, no light can get through the crossed crystals. The one cuts off all horizontal vibrations and horizontal components of vibration, the other cuts off all vertical vibrations and vertical components of vibration. Hence, when crossed, they produce a "dark field." One acts as polariser, the other as analyser. Let us return to the big polariser (Fig. 74) which we used in the previous experiment, and which was as clear as glass. It is made of Iceland spar, a natural crystal, Fig. n- Fig. 78. Fig. 79. which once w^as common but now is rare and expensive. As imported from the mine in Iceland this spar possesses the peculiar property known as " double refraction " : when you look through it you see everything double. Here is a fine specimen mounted in a tube. Look at your finger through it j you will see two fingers. It is a substance which splits the waves of light into two parts, giving two images ; and, moreover, polarises the light in the act of splitting it, so that each part is polarised. We do not, however, want both images ; .we want only one. What do we do ? We adopt the method proposed eighty years ago by William Nicol, a celebrated Scotch Ill POLARISATION OF LIGHT 121 philosopher, and construct out of a crystal of the spar a "polarising prism," or Nicol prism. Here are several Pircction vs>» > of Light Direction »>» >/- of Light Fig. 8o. Nicol prisms of various sizes ; and also several modern modifications ^ of the Nicol prism. Here also is a large wooden model to illustrate Nicol's method. ^ In Foucault's modification, a film of air is interposed between the two wedges of crystal. In Hartnack's prism a film of linseed oil is interposed, and the ends of the wedges are squared off. I have myself from time to time suggested several modifications which are Fig. 8i improvements upon the original Nicol prism. In one of these, the natural end- faces of the prism are sliced away parallel to the crystallographic axis so as to leave terminal faces that are " principal planes" (Fig. 8i), and the crystal is then sliced with an oblique cut 122 LIGHT LECT. Selecting a piece of Iceland spar of suitable propor- tions we slice it across (with a piece of copper wire, used as a saw, and some emery powder) in an oblique direction from one of its two blunt corners to the other ; polish the surfaces, thus dividing the prism into two wedges. These are then cemented together again with Canada balsam (a resinous cement) ; and the polarising prism is complete. Its operation upon light is as follows. When the waves enter through one end- face they are split into two parts which take slightly different directions, and strike at different angles upon the film of balsam. As a consequence one of the two beams when it meets the film of balsam is reflected off sideways, as from an oblique mirror, while the other goes through the prism and emerges at the other end-face. Consequently only one of the two beams gets through the prism, the other being suppressed or reflected out of the way. Prisms made in Nicol's way that is also a principal plane, and these wedges are then reunited with Canada balsam or linseed oil. In a cheaper modification — a "reversed Nicol" — the natural end-faces are cut off (Fig. 82) so as to reverse the shape, and the oblique cut is then made along a re- versed diagonal and is nearly in a "principal plane." In a third modifica- tion the end-faces are first trimmed off obliquely as principal planes of section through one of the natural edges of the end -face; an oblique cut is then given (as in Fig. 83) between two of the terminal arretes, from FM to GN, and the two pieces are then transposed ; and they are finally reunited by balsam along two of their natural faces. in POLARISATION OF LIGHT 123 Fig. 84. have usually oblique end-faces of diamond shape. The vibrations which pass through are those executed in the direction parallel to the shorter diagonal (Fig. 84) ; while those which are suppressed are those parallel to the longer diagonal. The large polariser used in front of the lantern (Fig. 74, p. 118) is simply a large Nicol prism. ^ ^ In consequence of the dearth of spar, large Nicol prisms can only be procured at extravagant prices. In 1888 Mr. Ahrens con- structed for me a large reflecting polariser, having a clear aperture of 2| inches. For projection purposes it is quite equal to a Nicol prism of equal aperture, and is much less costly. In this reflecting polariser, which is constructed on a principle suggested by Delezenne, the light is first turned to the proper polarising angle (about 57°) by a large total-reflexion prism of glass cut to a special shape. It is then reflected back parallel to its original path by impinging upon a mirror of black glass covered by a single sheet of the thinnest patent plate glass to increase the intensity of the light. Fig. 85 shows the design of this prism. Compared with a large Nicol prism it has one disadvantage : it cannot be conveniently rotated, so that it polarises the light in a fixed plane. To obviate this defect, I devised an "optical rotator" to place on the end of the prism. This consists simply of two plates, l • • Fl*^' ^5^- constituting ordinary light ims is but a gross and rough illustration of Stokes's hypo- thesis ; but it must suffice for the present. But I cannot close this course of lectures without one word as to the possibilities which this amazing dis- covery of the Rontgen light has opened out to science. It is clear that there are more things in heaven and earth than are sometimes admitted to exist. There are sounds that our ears have never heard : there is light that our eyes will never see. And yet of these inaudible, invisible things discoveries are made from time to time by the patient labours of the pioneers in science. You have seen how no scientific discovery ever stands alone : it is based on those that went before. Behind Rontgen stands Lenard; behind Lenard, Crookes; behind Crookes the line of explorers from Boyle and Hauksbee and Otto von Guericke downwards. We have had Crookes 's tubes in use since 1878, and therefore for nearly twenty years Rontgen' s rays have been in exist- 276 LIGHT LECT. VI ence, though no one, until Rontgen observed them on 8th November, 1895, even suspected^ their presence or surmised their qualities. And just as these rays remained for twenty years undiscovered, so even now there exist, beyond doubt, in the universe, other rays, other vibrations, of which we have as yet no cognisance. Yet, as year after year rolls by, one discovery leads to another. The seemingly useless or trivial observation made by one worker leads on to a useful observation by another; and so science advances, ^'creeping on from point to point." And so steadily year by year the sum total of our knowledge increases, and our ignorance is rolled a little further and further back ; and where now there is darkness, there will be light. ^ It is but fair to Professor Eilhard Wiedemann to mention that in August i8g5 he described some " discharge-rays " (Entladungs- strahlen) inside a vacuum tube, which, though photographically active, refused to pass through fluor-spar, and were incapable of being deflected by a magnet. But their properties differ from Rontgen rays in some other respects. APPENDIX TO LECTURE VI OTHER KINDS OF INVISIBLE LIGHT Upon the discovery by Rontgen of the rays that bear his name it was natural that the inquiry should be raised whether there exist any other rays having penetrative properties in any degree similar, Lenard's rays, discovered in 1894, to which some reference is made on p. 258 above, have the power of penetrating thin sheets of metal and of producing photographic action as well as of discharging electrified bodies. But they differ from Rontgen's rays in their pene- trative power, for air is relatively opaque to them. Also they are deflected in varying degrees by the magnet. Wiedemann's " discharge-rays," briefly mentioned above, are further described on p. 281. Many persons have supposed Rontgen's rays to be produced by electric sparks in the open air, simply because such sparks will fog photographic plates and cause images of coins and other metal objects in contact with the plates to impress images upon them. These images are, however, due to direct electric action. They are not produced when a sheet of aluminium is so interposed as to screen off all direct electrical action. In sunlight there do not appear to be any Rontgen rays, nor yet in the hght of the electric arc ; for neither of these sources contains any rays that will affect a photographic plate that is protected by an aluminium sheet. There are, however, some kinds of light that, like Ront- gen's rays, will pass through aluminium or through black 278 LIGHT LECT. VI cardboard, and produce photographic effects. These are worthy of some notice. BecquereVs Rays. — Early in 1896 M. Henri Becquerel, as mentioned on p. 272, and the author of this book in- dependently, made the observation that some invisible radia- tions are emitted from some of the salts of the metal uranium, as, for example, the nitrate of uranyl and the fluoride of uranium and ammonium. These and other salts of uranium, whether in the dark or in the light, emit a sort of invisible light, which can pass through aluminium and produce on a photographic plate shadows of interposed metal objects. PhospJwrus Light. — The author has examined the pene- trative effect of some other kinds of light. The pale light emitted by phosphorus when oxidising in moist air is accompanied by some invisible rays which will penetrate through black paper or celluloid, but will not pass through aluminium. So will some invisible rays that are emitted by the flame of bisulphide of carbon. Light of Glow-worms and Fireflies. — Dr. Dawson Turner has found that the light emitted by glow-worms contains photographic rays which will pass through alu- minium. In Japan, Dr. Muraoka has examined the rays emitted by a firefly (" Johanniskafer "). He found that they emitted rays which, after filtration through card or through copper plates, would act photographically. These rays can be reflected, and probably refracted and polarised. He used about 1000 fireflies shut up in a shallow box over the screened photographic plate. IViedejnami's Rays. — Professor E. Wiedemann in 1891 described some rays (named by him Discharge-rays, or E7itladiiiigsstrahle?i) which are produced in vacuum-tubes by the influence of a rapidly-alternating electric discharge. ' They have the property of exciting in certain chemically prepared substances, notably in calcium sulphate containing a small percentage of manganese sulphate, the power of thermo-luminescence. In other words, the substance after exposure to these rays will emit light when subsequently APP. OTHER KINDS OF INVISIBLE LIGHT 279 warmed. They are emitted at lower degrees of rarefaction than are necessary for producing the kathode rays. They are emitted from all parts of the path of the spark-discharge, but more strongly near the kathode. They are propagated in straight lines, but no reflexion of them by solid bodies has yet been observed. They are readily absorbed by certain gases, oxygen and carbonic dioxide, but their production is promoted by hydrogen and nitrogen. Those produced in hydrogen are partially transmitted by quartz and fluor-spar. They are apparently not present in the glow discharge. In vacuo these rays are produced by all parts of the discharge. Under the influence of electric oscillations they are emitted, even in some cases at half an atmosphere of pressure, at the boundary of the rarefied gas and the glass wall, even before any visible light is seen. No deviation of them by the magnet has yet been observ- able/ Those produced at relatively great pressures have in general the power of penetrating bodies according to the inverse ratio of their densities. New kinds of Kathode Rays. — The author in 1896 found three new kinds of kathode rays. One of these, termed parakathodic rays, is produced when ordinary kathode rays strike upon an anti-kathode, as in the " focus " tubes. If the vacuum is low, there are emitted from the anti- kathode, in nearly equal intensity in all directions, some rays that closely resemble ordinary kathode rays. They can be deflected electrostatically and magnetically, and can cast shadows of objects on the glass walls. If the vacuum is high enough for the production of Rontgen's rays, some parakathodic rays are also produced at the same time. They cause the glass bulb to fluoresce over an obliquely limited region as in Fig. 142, p. 265. The second kind, termed diakathodic rays, is produced by directing the ordinary kathode rays full upon a piece of wire-gauze, or upon a spiral of wire which is itself negatively electrifled. The ordinary kathode rays refuse to pass through the meshes of the gauze, but instead there passes through a beam of bluish rays, which differ from kathode rays in that they are not directly affected by a magnet. These diakathodic 28o LIGHT LECT. VI rays can also produce fluorescence of the glass where they meet the walls of the tube, and can cast shadows of inter- venmg objects ; but the fluorescence is of a different kind, for ordinary soda glass gives a dark orange fluorescence instead of its usual golden green tint. This orange fluor- escence when examined by the spectroscope shows the D-lines characteristic of sodium. A third kind, termed isokathodic rays, are formed by passing ordinary kathode rays along a vacuum tube in which the discharge travels successively through a number of small glass funnels, and is subjected at the same time to a transverse magnetic field. After passing through several of these the rays change their character so that they no longer cause fluorescence of the glass wall of the tube, and are no longer ordinary kathode rays. Goldstein^ s Rays. — ^Herr Goldstein has also described some rays apparently closely akin to the diakathodic rays. If a perforated disk is used as a kathode there are produced some blue rays which stream back behind the kathode opposite the apertures. He calls these Canal-rays, LECTURE VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS Emission by certain substances of radiations that will penetrate opaque screens — Properties of uranium salts — The Becquerel rays — Radio-activity — Examination by electroscope — Researches of the Curies — Madame Curie discovers polonhim and radium in pitchblende — Experiments with radium — Separation by magnetic field of the three kinds of rays emitted by radium — Strutt's radium clock — Crookes's spinthariscope — Researches of P. Curie on heat emitted by radium, and of Rutherford on disintegration of radium atom. Early in the year 1896, when all the scientific world was astir over the then newly discovered Rontgen rays, and the omniscient journalists were writing rubbish about the "new photography," many a quiet worker was trying over again the wonderful experiments by which Rontgen had enabled us to see, by their shadows cast on a fluorescent screen, the forms of hidden things. Let me recapitulate briefly the sum and substance of Rontgen's discovery. It had been known for many years that the substances which are fluorescent — in particular the crystalline powder called barium platinocyanide — shine in the dark when there fall upon them the invisible waves of ultra-violet light. Rontgen, using a Crookes' tube X 282 LIGHT LECT. excited by internal electric discharges from an induction coil, had found that from the antikathode of the tube there was emitted an invisible radiation — a new kind of rays — which resembled ultra-violet light in possessing the power of exciting fluorescence, but which differed from ultra-violet light, and indeed from every known kind of radiation, in being able to penetrate through black card- board, wood, and even through thin sheets of metals that are quite opaque to everything else. He was thus able to cast upon a fluorescent screen the shadows of the bones within the hand, or of the coins inside a purse. Now every student of physics knows of the principle of reversibility ; the principle which has led to so many discoveries of converse phenomena. Chemical combina- tion can create an electric current : the electric current can in turn produce chemical decomposition. An electric current can be used to magnetize a magnet : therefore,^ argued Faraday, it ought to be possible to generate an electric current by means of a magnet — and the idea led him to discover the principle of the dynamo. The cir- cumstance that invisible rays when falling on a fluorescent substance can make it shine in the dark naturally raised the speculation whether it were not possible to make a fluorescent body emit these invisible rays. The possibility of reversing Rontgen's discovery must have occurred to many minds. To two scientific workers, one in London, one in Paris, this thought came with sufficient force to cause them to make experiments to try whether this possibility could be realized. On February i6, 1896, I covered up a photographic dry-plate in an opaque envelope of thin black paper, and VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 283 laying it face upwards on a window-sill, I laid upon it a number of patches of substances known to be fluorescent or phosphorescent, fluor spar, sulphides of the alkaline earths, nitrate of uranium, bits of uranium glass, quinine, and some platinocyanides. Other plates were prepared, some of them having metal foil above the sensitive plate, and different materials were placed above them in various dispositions. After they had been given time to act, the photographic plates were to be developed in the dark- room. If after development they showed any markings in the parts where the fluorescent substances had been laid, this would have been prima facie evidence that the fluorescent body did emit some sort of radiation akin to the Rontgen rays. On the 27 th of February the plates were developed. The plate on which the miscellaneous collection of sub- stances had been exposed through black paper showed, to my great joy, a number of darkened patches, proving that some of them had indeed emitted a radiation of a highly penetrating character. The scientific consequences of a discovery of this kind are so important that they cannot be published without further corroboration or criticism. The result seemed to contradict the law laid down by Sir George Stokes for fluorescence many years before, that in any transformation of rays there is always a degradation of the wave-length to a slower frequency, whereas this seemed to be a transformation to a higher kind. So at once I wrote to Sir George Stokes to apprise him of my observations, and to ask his opinion. Meantime I developed some of the other plates and found that some of them showed 284 LIGHT LECT. traces of action ; others none. None of the sulphides of alkaUne earths or the platinpcyanides showed anything through metal foil. In fact the only one that showed anything through metal foil was a plate on which there had been placed a number of crystalline fragments of nitrate of uranium arranged in a circle over a sheet of aluminium foil. Fig 159 is a reproduction of the identical photograph obtained on February 27, 1896. Then came Stokes's reply followed by a second letter. He was most encouraging in saying that for some years he had known observations that were exceptions to the law he had laid down. But his second letter contained the ominous remark: "I fear you have already been anticipated. See Becquerel, Comptes rendus for Feb. 24, p. 420." And, sure enough, there was announced in black and white the discovery of the very same phenomenon by M. Henri Becquerel, the third of the famous scientific dynasty of Becquerels whose names are associated imperishably with electricity and optics. He had found that crystals of the double sulphate of uranium and potassium would act on a photographic plate wrapped in black paper, and would even traverse thin sheets of glass, aluminium, or copper. The Becquerel rays — for, by the wholesome rule established by Faraday, priority falls to him who first publishes a discovery — are then a species of ray or emana- tion which like the Rontgen rays can act on a photographic plate, and can pass through opaque substances. During the next few weeks I sought, as I had sought in the case of Rontgen rays, to ascertain by experiment whether these rays from uranium compounds could be polarized, or refracted. To avoid all dogmatizing as to their nature Fig. 159.— Photographic Plate acted on by Fragments of Uranium Nitrate. Obtained by the Author, February 27, 1896. Fig. i6o. — Henrt Becquerei., Discoverer of the Becquerel Rays. VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 285 I spoke of the phenomenon as hyperfiuorescence. M. Becquerel, who had apparently set out from much the same standpoint of searching for a possible inverse rela- tion between fluorescence and radiation, announced that the rays discovered by him could not only penetrate opaque substances, but could be reflected and refracted, whilst I could not find any such effects. In the course of the next few months he had pushed his investigations much farther, and had established several facts. These rays were independent of any fluorescence, and were emitted by all the various salts of uranium. They were continuously emitted, without appreciable diminution, month after month. The emitting substance required no stimulus such as subjection to light, or to heat : indeed its emission of the rays appeared to be altogether inde- pendent of temperature or any other physical conditions. Further, and of utmost importance, it was observed that these new rays possessed the power of causing the dis- charge of electrified bodies, situated at a distance, across the intervening air. Brought near to a charged gold leaf electroscope the leaves gradually collapsed, the rate at which the discharge proceeded being a measure of the efficiency of the specimen in emitting these rays. This furnished a second and quantitative method of study, which proved in the sequel most invaluable. In the first place it enabled M. Becquerel to ascertain that metallic uranium was about two and a half times as active as the double sulphate of uranium and potassium at first used. Then it was found that the air plays a distinct part in the effect, and that a sphere of electrified uranium though it spontaneously discharges itself in the air does not 286 LIGHT LECT. discharge itself in vacuo. Also that the air acted -upon by uranium or its salts behaves just like air which has been exposed to Rontgen rays, being more or less ionized thereby. These results led M. Becquerel to regard this property of emitting these radiations as a specific atomic property of the metal uranium, and he described the property itself by the name of radio-activity. As soon as the radio-activity of uranium and its salts became an established fact there arose a search for other materials which might possibly be radio- active. The fundamental experi- ment is very easily demon- strated. A convenient form of electroscope is that depicted in Fig 1 6 1. From a highly- insulating support of fused quartz or of amber there hangs, Fig. i6i.— Electroscope suitable on a short metal stcui, a single for Observation of Radio- . . , . . Activity. gold leaf or a leai of alummmm, beside a stiff metal strip. To charge the apparatus a short crooked brass wire which passes through the top of the apparatus is turned until its lower end touches the stem of the electroscope, and so a charge given to the crooked wire is conveyed to the gold leaf, which instantly stands out at an angle from the stiff strip by mutual repulsion. The crooked wire is then turned away out of contact with the strip, leaving the electroscope charged. Now if one brings near to the electroscope a bottle containing a few frag- VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 287 ments of metallic uranium, the gold leaf is seen gently to fall down toward the vertical position. The time required for the deflexion of the leaf to be reduced to half its initial value is, caeteris paribus^ a measure of the discharging influence of the active substance. Another and more accurate method of procedure is to the Electrometer Bt Layer of Radioactive Stuff r\\ Battery_ 'of Cell's ^\W^W^ » Switch ^ m Fig. 162. — Madame Curie's Apparatus for detecting Radio- Activity. shown by the arrangement of apparatus depicted in Fig. 162. In this apparatus two metal plates are arrayed parallel to one another. One of them can be highly electrified by means of a battery consisting of a large number of small accumulators, while the other is joined by a wire to an electrometer, and by a switch to earth. There is, therefore, an electric field between A and B, the intensity of which can be varied by varying the number of cells in the battery. If now the lower plate is covered with a layer of some uranium compound (or other active substance), the radiations which it emits 288 LIGHT LECT. cause the air above it to become conductive, and an actual electric current, weak indeed, but sufficient to be measured, passes across from the lower to the upper plate ; the strength of this current depending on the electromotive force of the battery, the amount of surface of the plates, and the intensity of the activity of the substance laid on the lower plate. So long as the switch is closed so that plate A and the electrometer are put to earth, nothing is observed. But on opening the switch so as to insulate the electrometer, it is observed to become charged, and the rate at which its index is deflected is proportional to the current to be observed. With this delicate means of observation, made still more accurate by a method of balancing the deflexion, devised by the late M. Pierre Curie, Madame Curie investigated the various compounds of uranium, and minerals con- taining uranium and thorium. The relative results were as follow : — Metallic uranium . 2-3 Green oxide of uranium . . 1-8 Nitrate of uranium . . .07 Oxide of thorium o-i to 1-4 Pitchblende from Joachimsthal . . 7-0 Pitchblende from Cornwall . 1-6 Orangite .... 2-0 Monazite . . . . • 0-5 Carnotite .... . 6-2 Chalcolite . , c . . . 5-2 All the minerals which showed themselves active contained either uranium or thorium ; but the surprising fact appeared that some of them were more active than pure uranium itself To clear up this anomaly Madame VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 289 Curie prepared from pure nitrate of uranium and acid phosphate of copper an artificial chalcolite which, how- ever, showed only about 0*92, a figure about proportional to the quantity of uranium in it. Thence it became probable that since pitchblende and natural chalcoHte showed so great an activity, it must be that they contain also a small quantity of some much more highly active substance different from either uranium or thorium. Madame Curie and her husband therefore set to work to extract, if possible, by processes of chemical analysis, from the mineral pitchblende, the more active constituent, the existence of which she had thus been led to suspect. The research was extremely laborious ; for a large quantity of pitchblende ore had to be first dissolved, and all the various known constituents separated out by precipitation and each result tested to find the presence of the active substance. Two such substances were in fact discovered. One which closely resembled bismuth was found by Monsieur and Madame Curie and was called polonium in honour of Madame Curie's native land; the other, which was precipitated along with barium, was separated by Madame Curie in collaboration with M. Bremont and was called radium. Chemically it resembled barium, from which it was finally separated as chloride of radium by fractional crystallization, the radium salt being slightly less soluble than that of barium. A third active body was afterwards obtained from pitchblende by M. Debierne and called actinium ; it resembles thorium chemically. Radium is now extracted from pitchblende, and chiefly from the uranium residues of the pitchblende 290 LIGHT LECTo mines at Joachimsthal in Bohemia. This mine has been long worked for uranium, which is used in the manufacture of canary-coloured glass. The mineral is roasted with carbonate of soda, and the resulting mass is treated with warm water and then with dilute sulphuric acid. The solution contains the uranium. The insoluble residues which contain the radio-active bodies used to bs thrown away. Madame Curie obtained some tons of these residues. They consist chiefly of sulphate of lead, sulphate of lime, silica, alumina, and oxide of iron, accompanied by small quantities of many other metals. The process of extraction of the radium is tedious and costly. One ton of residue yields from forty to fifty pounds of crude sulphates, the activity of which is from thirty to sixty times as great as that of metallic uranium. Then begins the long process of fractionating the chlorides or bromides to concentrate the least soluble part by ' crystallizing and redissolving many times. Each operation reduces the quantity of material till at last a few grains only remain, which may have, however, an activity a million times greater than that of the original residue. Radium is consequently very costly — in fact the most costly substance known on earth. The price in 19 lo for the purest radium bromide is about ;£i6 for one milligramme. That is ^16,000 per gramme, or ;£"5, 25 7,600 per pound ! Pitchblende is also found in Cornwall. The Cornish samples are less rich in radium than those from Bohemia, but at the present price of the precious product the Cornish ore should be well worth extracting. Several mineral springs, such as the waters of Bath and those of Fig. 163. — Madame Curie. Fig. 164. — Righi's Skiagram. Obtained by exposure to Radium Bromide. VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 291 Buxton, are found to contain traces of radium. The Hon. R. J. Strutt has indeed found that many soils and rocks contain radio-active matter in small traces. A small quantity of radium bromide, as large only as a mustard seed, will suffice to show the characteristic properties, so marvellously active it is. If a photographic plate is covered with a sheet of aluminium foil, and opaque metal objects are laid over it, then an exposure for a few minutes to the radiations of radium will suffice to produce on it the shadows of these objects. The accompanying plate, Fig. 164, was thus produced by Professor Righi, of Bologna, during a lecture. It is easy similarly to show the radio-active properties of thorium salts. If a piece of a common Welsbach mantle (see p. 345 below) is flattened out and dried, and is then laid down (in the dark) on an ordinary photographic dry-plate and left there in the dark for a few days and developed, a print will be found showing the structure of the mantle. The power of radium to ionize the air in its neigh- bourhood is shown by its rendering the air conductive as in the experiment illustrated in Fig. 162 ; but another electrical experiment shows how it may facilitate the passing of a spark between two metal conductors in air. Let an ordinary small spark-coil be arranged with wires from its secondary terminals SS to two spark-gaps A and B, in parallel to one another. By adjusting the brass balls at each of these gaps to equality it can be arranged that the sparks shall pass equally frequently at A or B. Now bring a small specimen of radium bromide near either one. At once the sparks will disappear at 292 LIGHT LECT. Induction Coil the other spark-gap, and will be redoubled at the spark- gap that is near the radium. When the Becquerel rays were first discovered the question was keenly discussed whether they were the same as Rontgen's rays or not. Becquerel himself at first thought that he had been able to reflect, refract, and polarize them, so that in spite of their great penetrative power they were essentially different. But when other experimenters Fig. 165. -Spark-gap Experiment, totally failed to find any trace of these actions, the question of similarity once more became important. Like the Rontgen rays the Becquerel rays could be stopped, absorbed, by using thick sheets of lead, though they" would penetrate lighter metals, and thin sheets even of lead. But the Rontgen rays differed amongst them- selves. ■ Those generated in tubes that had been carried to the highest degree of exhaustion (or "hard" tubes) were more highly penetrative in their action than those generated in less highly exhausted (or " soft ") tubes. They were not deflected by a magnet as the kathode streams were. Would the Becquerel rays show similar peculiarities ? So soon as the isolation of radium furnished a more powerful source of radio-activity it became possible to answer such questions. The Curies made careful experiments and showed that they were not homogeneous, but consisted of several sorts with distinct properties. A small quantity of radium salt was VII RADIUM AND ITS RAYS 293 placed in a hole bored into a small thick cylinder of lead. From the mouth of the hole the rays of all sorts emerged. Across the line of their path was directed a very intense magnetic field. If the radium rays were negatively electrified like the kathode rays they would be deflected sideways. If they were positively electrified like the parakathodic (or " canal ") rays they would be Fig. 166. — Deflexion by a Magnetic Field of the Rays emitted by Radium. deflected to the other side. If they were like Rontgen's rays they would not be deflected at all To test any such deflexion a photographic dry-plate was placed parallel to, and just below, the emerging stream of rays, and in a plane at right angles to the magnetic field. The experiment revealed a surprising fact. All three kinds of rays were present. Fig. 166 shows the result. Some rays were deflected slightly to the left at A and Y 294 LIGHT LECT. apparently unable to penetrate far into the air, and the direction of their deflexion proved them to carry positive charges of electricity. Others deflected to the right, at B, showed beautifully curved trajectories, and carried negative charges. A third series were shot out almost straight, and carried no electric charges. Later these three kinds of " rays " were denominated by Professor Rutherford as a, ^, and 7 rays respectively. CL. The aipha-r2iys resemble ca?tal-r^.ys, and are positive. 13. The beta-rsiys resemble kathode-xdcys^ and are negative. y. The gamma-rdcy?> resemble Rontgen's rays or X-rays. The a-rays have little penetrative power ; a sheet of aluminium a few thousandths of an inch thick stops them : they appear to consist of flights of single atoms positively charged, moving at a high speed. The ^-rays also behave like charged bodies ; but they are negatively charged ; and their mass is much less than that of ordinary atoms, being minute corpuscles — — " electrons " — certainly not more than -y^^-q P^^^t as heavy as hydrogen atoms. The < \) 800 ^K '^ '• ^ ^^\ y -J 600 ^. y. , • 104 4.00 ./ ^ c< ^-^.. 200 ^ r ^-'i ^"^o 100 ^ ^^--J 3-75 3-5 3-25 S'O 2-73 2-5 2-25 2-0 Efficiency in Watts per candle power Fig. 194. — Curve of Relation between Efficiency and Life of Carbon Filament Glow-lamps. quickly disintegrates, and it breaks at the weakest point. Fig. 194 gives, from the experience of the Robertson Lamp Company, a diagram of the way in which, as we raise the volts, we raise the efficiency, but also shorten the life of the lamp. The life-factor may be conveniently stated in the following form : — Per Cent of Normal Voltage. Percentage of Normal Life. I03 100 JOI 80 -8 102 68-1 103 56-2 104 45-2 105 37-4 106 31-0 354 LTGHT lect. Raising the voltage only 6 per cent reduces the average life to less than one-third of the normal value. New Kinds of Glow-lamps. — Several newer kinds of glow-lamps are now in the market. A radical departure was made some seven years ago, when Nernst proposed to use a filament that looks like a thread of pipe-clay, but is in reality made of zirconia and yttria, or similar materials of special emissivity. Such a thread does not conduct the electric-current unless first heated ; so the Nernst- lamps. Fig. 195, contain a special heating device warmed by the current itself, so that the filament lights up as soon as it becomes conductive. Partly because of the specific emissivity of the materials, also probably, in part, because of the attainment of a higher temperature, the Nernst filament works with a higher efficiency than the carbon filament, requiring only about 2 to 2 J watts per candle. The dominant wave-length of its light is 128 millionths-^ of a centimetre, which would correspond to a temperature of 2300° (absolute), if it radiates as a black body does. If the effect is due to a specific emissivity the actual temperature may be lower. More recently glow-lamps have been proposed having metallic filaments. Platinum will not do for this purpose ; its melting point (1775° C.) is too low. But the rare metal osmium has been proposed by Auer von Welsbach, tantalum by von Bolton and Feuerlein, zirconium by Zerning, and tungsten by Kusel. The difficulty in pre- paring fine wires, about -gJo inch thick, of these hard and almost infusible metals is great but not insur- mountable. Osmium-lamps have been on the market since 1904, tantalum-lamps since the year 1905 only. VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 355 Tungsten -lamps came in only in 1906. Yet the results have been most promising, and the tantalum- lamp (Fig. 196) is already largely in use. With the osmium-lamp the consumption of energy goes down to 176 watt per candle; with the tantalum-lamp to 1-5 Fig. 195. — Nernst Glow-lamp. Fig. 196. — Tantalum-lamp. watt per candle. The melting point of tantalum is about 2520° or 2570° (absolute) ; hence the light is very white. For the tungsten-lamp an efficiency of i candle per watt is claimed. If this can be realized, the cost of electric-lighting will be reduced to one-third of that of our present carbon glow-lamps. Here, at least, is attain- able a considerable economy in the manufacture of light. 356 LIGHT LECT. Since the delivery of this lecture tungsten-lamps have been much developed. The leading sort is that put on the market under the name of the " osram " lamp. The metal tungsten is so ex- cessively hard that it can- not be drawn into wire in the ordinary way. The ingenuity of inventors has therefore been exercised in devising methods for handling it, so that it can be made into thin wires, otherwise than by drawing through dies. Fig. 197 represents an " osram " lamp giving about 16 candle-power, and con-- suming only 17 watts. If supplied at an electric pres- sure of 105 volts, it takes only about J of an ampere of current, whereas a car- bon glow-lamp of equal brightness would take h an ampere. Besides this, the light is whiter than that of a carbon glow-lamp, as the temperature of the tungsten filament may be made higher. Moreover, metallic filament lamps are less sensitive than carbon filament lamps to varia- tions in the electric pressure. They are, however, rather more fragile, owing to the extreme tenuity of the filament Fig. 197. — An "Osram" Lamp with Tungsten Filament. VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 357 New kinds of Arc -lamps. — Improvements in electric arc-lamps are also to be noted. The ordinary arc-lamp sheds its light mainly from the white-hot end of the upper carbon rod ; but as the lower carbon comes Fig. 198. — Curve of Distribution of Light of Ordinary Arc-lamp. into the way, the maximum illumination is cast obliquely downward, as the curve of distribution of light. Fig. 198, shows. x\bout twelve years ago the fashion began of enclosing the arc in a nearly air-tight inner globe. By this device the rate of consumption of the carbon rods was greatly reduced, thereby saving much of the cost 2 c 358 LIGHT LECT. and labour of renewals. But the loss in light by absorp- tion due to the double globe was very considerable, and the efficiency of the lamp reduced. More recently an advance has been made in the introduction of impreg- nated carbons. Salts of potash have long been known to improve the quality of the light emitted ; and, more- over, their introduction permits a wider separation of the Fig. 199. — Curves of Distribution of Light of Arc-lamps. carbons, so that the downward light is less intercepted. Salts of strontium and calcium, particularly the fluoride of calcium, are effective in increasing the quantity of light emitted for a given consumption of energy. In these cases the arc becomes a veritable flame of light, the luminosity being mainly in the arc itself and no longer in the incandescent tips. By using two inclined carbons with arc deflected downward, an enormous increase in light is obtained. The curves of Fig. 199 (due to Wed- VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 359 ding) are instructive. That marked A is the distribution curve of an ordinary "open" arc -lamp. When sur- rounded by an interior globe as an " enclosed " arc, the output is diminished to the value shown by B ; while, when a " flaming " arc was produced, using only the same amount of energy, the output of light was increased more than fourfold, and the distribution curve takes the form delineated in C. The introduction of salts of calcium gives to the arc a fine orange hue, which appears to possess special penetrative powers in a foggy atmosphere. By the kindness of the Union Electric Company of London, one of their " Excello " flaming arc-lamps is here exhibited. The Magnetite Arc-lamp. — The newest species of arc-lamp is that of Dr. C. P. Steinmetz of Schenectady. After careful study of incandescent materials, he selected the oxide of iron, called juagnetife, for making the negative electrode of the lamp. This material, mixed with the oxide of chromium or of titanium, rammed into an iron cartridge, is supported at the bottom of the lamp. The upper or positive pole is a piece of solid copper. The arc thus produced is an intensely white column of light about I inch long. The copper pole is not consumed, and the cartridge of magnetite is only slowly used up. One feature of this lamp is that the maximum of the light is thrown almost horizontally, so that it is admirably adapted for the lighting of streets. This lamp, not being yet in the market in this country, I am indebted to Dr. Steinmetz for the specimen now shown. It is highly efficient, giving about twice as much light as the ordinary arc-lamp for equal consumption of energy. The spec- 36o LIGHT LECT. trum of the light of the magnetite arc reveals the cause of this high efficiency. It consists largely of brilliant bands of light in the green and red regions ; in fact, it is largely a gaseous spectrum. The Electric Vapour-lamp. — The vapour of mer- cury, traversed by an electric current, emits a brilliant bluish-green light. Various lamps have been designed to bring this into practical use. Of these the best known is the Cooper-Hewitt. The British Westinghouse Com- pany has kindly supplied two of these for this lecture. -Posit we had Negative lead- Seal off / Condensing chamber VaOLium tube Platinum \ \/ron electrode '"^'""''y electrode mire \ Platinum wire Protective porcelain tip a j. 4- , ■ x- '^ Protective porcelain tip Fig. 200. — Cooper- Hewitt Mercury Vapour-lamp. A glass tube, about i inch in diameter, and 3 or 4 feet in length, according to the voltage of supply, is arranged with suitable electrodes at the ends (Fig. 200), and con- tains nothing else except mercury and mercury vapour. To cause the current to flow it is sufficient to tilt the lamp, causing the thread of mercury that is formed along the bottom of the tube when horizontal to part. At once the tube is filled with a soft but brilliant flood of green light. It is found to be about the same efficiency as the ordinary arc-lamp, giving about i'66 candle per watt, and is therefore far above any of the glow-lamps in its economy. VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 361 As already pointed out, it is the property of a vapour, when incandescent, to throw its energy into a few briUiant rays, producing in this case a predominance of green and blue. The heat-rays are not absent : but there is a higher proportion of luminous rays than would be the case if the shining body were a solid. Vapour-lamps may therefore be regarded as a step towards the lumin- escence lamp of the future. If only one could devise a plan of setting the atoms or electrons into vibration without exciting the grosser vibrations of the molecules the end would be attained, and the very freedom of the molecules in the gaseous state seems to favour this possibility. Yet in the phosphorescence of the fire-fly, and in the luminescence produced by cathode discharges, there appears to be a possibiHty of touching the atom within the molecule, even in substances that are not vapours. Comparison of Electric - lamps. — The following table exhibits in comparative form the efficiencies of the Efficiencies of Electric-Lamps Watts per Candle (horizontal). Candles per Watt. Candles per H.P. Glow-lamp. 3' 3 0-3 246 Nernst-lamp 1-5 0-67 495 Osmium-lamp 1-5 o'6j 495 Tantalum-lamp . I '4 07 532 Tungsten-lamp . I'O I"0 746 Arc-lamp . 0-67 1-5 IIIO Vapour-lamp 0-6 1-66 1240 Magnetite-lamp . 0*25 4-0 2984 Flame Arc-lamp 0-17 5-8 4300 62 LIGHT LECT. various kinds of electric lamps, and shows how great is the advance made by the recent inventions. The great economy of the flame arc is, however, not sustained except for arcs of enormous power ; and a small lamp, that is, one of from 5 to 20 candle-power, giving more than I candle-power per watt, is a thing still awaiting invention. Cost of Manufacture of Light. — We come now to the all- important question of the cost of the light as manufactured in these different kinds of lamps. To deal with this question we must adopt some figures for the cost of the gas, the oil, and the electric-energy which are respectively the supplies from which the light is manufactured. Prices differ in different districts. Those taken here for convenience are — Gas (normal quality i6-candle gas at 5 cubic feet per hour) taken at 2s. per 1000 cubic feet. Paraffiit Oil (American kerosene, with flash-point at 110° F.) taken at 8d. per gallon. Electric -Energy taken at 2-4d. per "unit" {i.e. per kilowatt-hour). One must also adopt a unit for quantity of light, and for this we take the candle-hour^ meaning the total quantity of light given out during i hour by a light of I candle-power. The following table gives a resume, according to the measurements of Professor Wedding, translated into British values, of a number of different sources of light as measured by him. For these the figures of cost given are calculated down into pence per candle-hour VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGFIT 363 on the foregoing basis. In a city like York, where gas costs IS. lod. instead of 2s. per 1000 cubic feet, the cost of gas-lights will be reduced correspondingly. In London, where the price is 2s. 9d., they will be correspondingly raised. [Table 4-' CI t^ 00_^ lO ^ f^ ^ 00^ o VO be ct cf rc rT u-i CO cf tC xj-i o" rC C >. CJ -c HH «N p-1 '^ biO C 8 §;? S2 M '^ M '^ M VO 00 o o a H^ 3 00 p C^ Ov .^ ON P p ,"* y~t ^ 6 O U i^ ^ ri o 00 ro '« b vb On ro V 0) b > M ^ N '^ „ N VO 00 o o (^ r^ o u~ h OO ro »— 1 o VO ON fO '^ M O «4_; W Sal S o O o o O O O o O O O p p p p O P P p P P ^-1 c b b b b b b b b b b , ^ u-l ON 00 hM ON >-o N o 00 o o y hH cs hH 00 ON ro cs lO t-H 00 o o o o rn VO 00 ro o "t; o o o o O O o O v5S p p p p p P p p P o H > u b b b b b b b b b b ^ hi z ^ i . M N N )-H 00 o w r^ o ii-> N ro {-^ {^ OO y H ago o VO m r^ b lO LO vb ro b >Iq E "^ ^ N H-t t— ( 4j (b • O"^ ro t-H fe rt H pq ^ o ir^ O 1/2 . l; lo T^ VO CO »j-> VO C/3 i iJ'S M yo vp .'^d- r^ f^ HH r' fv) O 00 r^ ro LO '- N -' b p^ •-N .^ '^ ro ro hH M On LO m o o ON ro VO p< j , o en < U1 K .^ , a • >-, • 'JP o ^ ^ .^ 6 M o' Oh a, ri 6 < Flame LECT. viii THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 365 If we cast our eye upon the column of figures headed British Thermal Units per Candle -hour we find there how vastly the different sorts of lamps differ in the amounts of heat-energy which has to be supplied to them to generate equal total amounts of light. While the batswing gas-jet needs 310 British thermal units ^ to give T candle-hour, an electric flaming arc needs less than i B.T.U. per candle-hour. Again, an in- candescent gas-light of ordinary Welsbach mantle type requires 43 B.T.U. per candle-hour, whilst an ordinary glow-lamp only requires from 10 to 15 B.T.U. per candle-hour. Yet it is notorious that the incandescent gas is cheaper than the glow-lamp for equal amounts of Hght. The explanation lies in the difference in the cost of the heat ; for the incandescent gas-light gets its heat by burning gas, whereas the glow-lamp gets its heat from the electric-energy supplied to- it. And (at the prices taken) a B.T.U., if manufactured by burning gas, costs 0*000042 pence, whilst if manufactured by expendi- ture of electric-energy costs o "00064. That is to say, so far as production of the mere heat in the lamp is con- cerned, electricity (at the prices taken) costs fifteen times as much as gas. But heat is precisely what we do not want. And because the gas-lamps waste so much of their energy in mere non-luminous heat, they are not, when we come to examine the column of figures of costs per candle-hour, so superior. How much light can we ^ The British thermal tinit is that amount of heat which would warm i pound of water I degree of the Fahrenheit scale. It is equal to 251 '98 gramme-calories^ or to 1048 joules, or to 0'000296 kilowatt-hour. One kilowatt-hour equals 3435 British thermal units- 366 LIGHT lect. buy for a florin? That question is answered in the figures of the table. The dearest source, except a bad glow-lamp (No. 2, which was obviously very inefficient even for a glow-lamp), is the batswing gas-jet, which gives for a florin only 2720 candle-hours. The best of the gas-lights is the high-pressure incandescent, re- presented in the Table by the Millennium, which gives 25,494, but it is surpassed by the Flame Arc, which gives 47.619. During the last two years much progress has been made with inverted incandescent gas lamps. In this pattern the Bunsen burner is turned upside down, and the flame is directed into a mantle hanging like a bag beneath it. Though this form is not more economical in itself, it is effectively so, because more of its light is advantageously downwards. The Cheapest Form of Light. — Earlier our atten- tion was drawn to the circumstance that the process of manufacturing light by incandescence was indirect, while the process of manufacture by liwiinescence was direct, the energy being turned into light without the production of extraneous heat. This is the secret of the glow-worm and the fire-fly ; but it is also the secret of the more brilliant phosphorescence of the cathode rays, as shown you in Crookes' vacuum tubes. Somehow these insects have found out the way, which man also has found in the case of the Crookes' tubes, how to excite the delicate vibrations of the atoms, or of the electrons associated with them, without having to resort to the coarser process of setting all the molecules of the mass dancing with heat. In the possibility of chemical VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 367 or cathodic means of exciting luminescence lie the immense opportunities of the future. We in Great Britain spend annually a gigantic sum, estimated at from ;2^i 0,000,000 to ;^2o,ooo,ooo in manufacturing for ourselves such artificial lights as our civilization demands. Ninety-nine per cent at least of this colossal sum is thrown away on mere heat. What a future awaits the man who will invent a practicable luminescence lamp giving light without heat ! Future Progress. — It is abundantly evident that there is room for future developments. Progress comes about in two ways. We may take the existing things and by careful experiment and attention to detail improve them bit by bit : that is one way. But every now and then it happens that a man of genius working in the quiet of his laboratory discovers some new fact, which is at first apparently obscure and of no importance. He publishes the observation by reading a paper to some learned society : it is printed in its journal of proceedings and promptly forgotten. Years afterwards, it may be, some practical man comes along, gets hold of the obscure fact, and works it up into a shape that has commercial value. He gets hold of a financier who puts it on the market, and the world hears of a new invention. Some- body makes a fortune, but very seldom does it benefit the original discoverer. The special incandescence of erbia and thoria was known to the chemists forty years ago ; but no one heard of incandescent gas-lighting till Auer von Welsbach devised the mantle to utilize this remark- able property. I have shown you the remarkable luminescence of rubies and of willemite when stimulated 368 LIGHT lect, by cathode discharges in a Crookes' tube ; but lumin- escent-lamps on that plan are not yet practical. The great economies effected by high-pressure gas and by the flame arc are as yet only attained in big lamps. The immediate want is the production of small lamps of equal economy. Perhaps we shall have small electric vapour-lamps before long. One step toward improve- ment will be the cheapening of the sources of supply, both of gas and of electric-energy. Gas ought now to be evaluated not by its supposed candle-power, but by its calorific power. A gas equal in heating-power to that now supplied could be made for tenpence per looo cubic feet if we did not require it to burn with a bright flame -of its own, and were to use mantles to get the light. -And electric-energy instead of costing 2*4 pence per unit can be manufactured at far less than a halfpenny per unit, if manufactured on a large enough scale. There are tremendous possibilities before us : but the possibilities before us in the domain of luminescence are far greater than those in the domain of incandescence. I have no fear as to the ultimate solution of the problem of the manufacture of light. The lamp of the future giving light without extraneous heat will be a luminescence lamp. It will therefore be an electric-lamp, but not an incandescent one. A Radium - lamp. — To the possibilities already named, science has lately added a new one in the dis- covery of radium. This surprising and perplexing metal acts as though it were an inexhaustible source of invisible radiations of singular power. A few milligrammes of radium placed near a piece of phosphorescent material VIII THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT 369 such as willemite, cause it to shine in the dark, making thus a perpetual lamp. You may think that here we have the promise of the very cheapest source of light. Alas for such wishes, the laws of economy are not yet to be over-ridden. Radium is excessively rare and expen- sive. To produce by its phosphoric stimulus on willemite a lamp of even i candle-power requires a few milligrammes of radium, and those few milligrammes will cost at least £']o. For a capital cost of ^70 one may perhaps get a perpetual light of i candle-power ! And the mere interest on the capital will run to something like one farthing per hour for all the hours that the light would be of service. Why, a tallow candle would be cheaper. The dearest of all our sources of light by incandescence does not run to more than y^o^th of a penny per candle-hour. So that which seemed to be the cheapest source of light, costing nothing but interest on capital, turns out to be the dearest. Sunlight after all. — No, the cheapest source of light still remains to be the commonest and most universal, the light of the sun, which shines alike on rich and poor, and gives us — such is the admirable economy — a light of which the dominant wave-length is 50 millionths of a centimetre, just that wave-length to which our eyes have become, in the long evolution of the ages, the most sensitive. By no artificial process can we manufacture light so cheaply that it would not be still cheaper to adjust our social habits to the hours of sunlight, and do our day's work while it is yet day. INDEX Abney, Sir William, on emulsion films, i66 on colour- vision, 1^2 fi^^'^'^^^ on minimum visible luminosity, 211 his measurements of the relative composition of light, 330 measurements on the absorbing effect of the atmosphere, 331 Absorption of light by coloured media, 88 and anomalous dispersion, 104 by black surfaces, 201, 332 of Rontgen rays, 243 effect on sunlight, 331 and emission, 331 Acetylene lamp, 20 Actinic waves, 162, 182 Actinium, 289 Ahrens's polariser, 123 Air-pump, the mercurial, 247, 251 thermometer, experiment with, 202 Aladdin, lamp of, 180 Alexandrite, colours of, 86 Aluminium, transparency of, to Rontgen rays, 243 leaf, use of, in electroscopes, 269 Amethyst, optical properties of, 134 Ampere's construction, 69 Amplitude of wave-motion, 9 Analyser, 117 Analysis of light by prism or grating, 79, 86 Animatograph, 97 Anomalous refraction, 100 Ansc^iitz's moving pictures, 97 Antikathode, the, 265 Antipyrin, optical properties of, 150 Arc-lamp, emission of light by, III, 310 whiteness of light of, 211 magnetite, 359, 361 new kinds of, 357, 361 Artificial rainbow, 79, 80 Ayrton and Perry, on ratio of the electric units, 233 Becquerel, Professor Henri, his discovery of radiations from uranium salts, 272, 278, 284 Becquerel rays, 278, 284 power of causing the discharge of electrified bodies, 285 compared with Rontgen rays, 292 Benham's colour-top, 96 Bid well, Shelford, on fatigue of retina, (^6 footnote strange colour-effects, 99 foot- note Black, is mere absence of light, 72 cross, in polariscope, 134, 152 surfaces absorb waves and grow warm, 202 371 372 LIGHT Black surfaces radiate better than bright, 203 radiation of black bodies at different temperatures, 339 Blue and yellow make white, 89, 146, 188 Blue of the sky, theory of, 233 Bologna stone, 177 Bolometer, use of, 197, 334 Boltzmann, Professor Ludwig von, on electro-optics, 234 Bose, Professor J. Chunder, his apparatus for optical study of electric waves, 226 on polarisation of electric waves, 227 Boyle, Hon. Robert, on phosphor- escence of diamonds, 177 Brdmont, M., 289 Bright field, 118, 212 Brightness of lights, 14 Brodhun and Lummer Photo- meter, 1 9 Burning-glass, 37 mirror, 206 Calc-spar : see Iceland spar Calorific waves, 162, 193, 197 Campbell -Swinton, A. A., his photographs by Rontgen rays, 270 Candle, standard, 14, 20, 314 Canton's phosphorus, 175 Casciarolo of Bologna, 177 Chalcolite, 289 Chemical effects of waves, 163, 166 Chemi-luminescence, 175, 176 Christiansen dn anomalous dis- persion, 100 Cold, apparent radiation of, 205 "Colonia" gas compressor, 349, 350 Colour and wave-length, 71, 72 sensations, primarj', 183 top, Benham's, 97 vision, 183 Coloured stuffs viewed in coloured light, 82 Colours that are not in the spec- trum, 87 complementary, 91, 11 1, 136, 188 of polarised light, 136 of thin plates, 137 of soap bubbles, 138 supplementary, 149 Combination of colours, 84, 85, 142 to produce white light, 83, 146 Complementary colours, 91, 188 tints, 91, 93, III, 188 in bright and dark field, 136 in double-image prism, 149 Concave lens, diverges light, 41 mirror, reflexion by, 27 Contrast tints, 92, 93, 99 Convergence of light to focus by reflexion, 26 by refraction, 35, 37, 41 Convex lens, converges the light, 40 mirror, reflexion by, 24, 28 Cooper-Hewitt mercury vapour lamp, 360 Cornea of eye, 44 Corpuscular theory of light, 230 Critical angle, 39. Crookes, Sir William, his radio- meter, 199, 213, 252 tube used by Rontgen, 239, 241 improvements in vacuum pump, 250 on repulsion due to radiation, 252 on properties of kathode rays, 253 views on radiant matter, 253, 258 tube with shadow of cross, 255 invented focus tube, 256 his spinthariscope, 298 vacuum tubes, 366 Cryptoscope, 268 Crystalline lens of the eye, 44 Crystallo-luminescence, 175 INDEX 373 Crystals, elasticity of, 129 Curie, M. Pierre, 288, 289 experiments with radium, 292 on heat emitted by radium, 299 Curie, Madame, her apparatus for detecting radio-activity, 287 results of her investigations of the various compounds of uranium, 288 discovers polonium and radium, 289 experiments with radium, 292 Curvature, printed on the wave- front, 24 imprinted by lens or curved mirror, 43, 56, 67 expansion of, 61 Cylindrical lens, 49, 83 Dark field, 119, 120 for polarised heat-waves, 212 Davy, Sir Humphry, on reflexion of heat, 206 Debierne, M. , obtains actinium from pitchblende, 289 Delezenne's polariser, 12,2) footnote Den,ser medium, 35 Density and refractivity, 49 Detection of false gems by polar- ised light, 133 by Rontgen rays, 272 Detectors of electric waves, 217, 223, 226 Dewar, Professor James, on phos- phorescence of bodies cooled in liquid air, 179 Diakathodic rays, 279 Diamond does not polarise light, 134 phosphorescence of, 177, 178 transparency of, to Rontgen rays, 270 Dielectrics, 104, 232 Difference of phase, 136 Diffraction-grating, 31, -jj, 79 spectrum, 78 Diffuse reflexion, 30 Dioptrie, definition of, 59 Direction of the vibrations in polarised light, 233 Diselectrification by ultra -viole, light, 181 by Rontgen rays, 268 Dispersion of light by prism, 74 anomalous, 100 and frequency, 158 Divergence of light from focus by reflexion, 24 by refraction, 41 Divergivity, 62 Double-image prism, 125 Double refraction, 120 refraction. Lord Rayleigh on theory of, 233 Ebonite, transparency of, for heat-waves, 213 optical and dielectric properties of> 233 Effluvio-luminescence, 175 Elasticity in crystals, \2.<^ foot7iote axes of, 131 Elastic-solid theory of light, 156 Electric oscillations, 219 waves, 214 waves, prediction of, by Clerk Maxwell, 229 sparks in vacuo, luminosity due to, 247 sparks, oscillatory, 218 lamps, table of efflciencies of, 361 lighting, invention of, 304 vapour lamp, 360, 361 Electricity discharged by ultra violet light, 181 by Rontgen rays, 268 incandescence by, 309 Electro-luminescence, 175 Electromagnetic theory of anomal- ous dispersion, 102 theory of light, 230 ' ' Electrons," 294 Electroscope, used for photo-elec- tric experiments, 181 D 374 LIGHT Electroscope, as detector of electric waves, 223 with aluminium leaves, 181, 269 use of, by Lenard, 259 use in observing diselectrifica- tion, 269 for observation of radio-activity, 286, 287 Emission of light at different tem- peratures, 174, 331 measurement of, 333 Emissivity of the rare earths, 344 Emulsion films in photography, 166 Energy curves, 334, 335 spectra of black body, 341, 343 of platinum, 343 Ether, the, 108, 230 Eye, the, sensitiveness of, 14, 328 as optical instrument, 43 images are inverted in, 45 unable to detect polarisation, III of codfish, in polarised light, 151 Fairy Fountain, 39 Faraday, Professor Michael, first experiments in electro -optics, 229, 230 his electromagnetic theory of light, 231 on the production of flame, 309 Fatigue, effects of, x-\foot7iote, 93, 96 Fechner's law of magnitude of sen- sation, -L^ footnote Filter-screens for invisible light, 164, 213 Fireflies, luminescence of, 176, 311. 337 rays emitted by, pass through copper, 278 light of the American, 337 FitzGerald, Professor George F. , on electromagnetic theor}' of reflexion and refraction, 233 on starting waves in the ether, 234 Fizeau, on number of waves in train, 112, o.-j ^ foot?iote Flame standards, 314 Flames, radiation of heat by, 203 Fleming, Professor J. A. , magnetic action on kathode rays, 255 his electric lamp, 2,'^^ footnote "Flicker" photometers, 2>'^i, foot- note Fluorescence, phenomejion of, 169 experiments in, 170, 283 table of, 175 Fluorescent screens, 268 use of, in ultra-violet light, 172 Fluoroscope, 268 Fluor-spar, transparency to ultra- violet light, 164, 166 photo - luminescence (fluores - cence) of, 169 thermo-luminescence of, 180 Focus, real, 26, 37 virtual, 26 tubes, Crookes's, 256 , , the author's, 265 ,, Jackson's, 266 ,, Bohm's, 267 Formulae for refraction, 61 for lenses, 65, 67 for reflexion, 67 Foucault's modification of Nicol's prism, 121 Frequencies and wave-lengths, table of, 190 Frequency of sound waves, 106 of different colours, 190 Fresnel's theory of light, 157 views as to direction of vibra- tions, 233 GaUtzine, Prince, on alleged polarisation of Rontgen rays, 2.61 footnote Gases, optical and dielectric pro- perties of, 233 glow in vacuum tubes, 248 Gas flame, temperatures in, 308 Gas-lighting, invention of, 304 high-pressure incandescent, 349 INDEX 375 Gas-lights, incandescent, 345 mantle, inverted, distribution of luminous rays, 321 Geissler's tubes, 247 Gems, optical properties of, 86, 119, 120, 133, 134, 178, 254 Geometrical optics, methods of, 55 Germany, research in, 263 Gifford, J. W. , his photographs by Rontgen rays, 270 Gladstone, Dr. J. Hall, on photo- graphing the invisible, 168 Glass, velocity of light in, 35 polarising properties of un- annealed, 151 strain in, 152 absorption of ultra-violet light by, 164 opacity of, to ultra-violet light, 166, 174 opacity of, to heat-waves, 198 opacity of, to Rontgen rays, 271, 272 Glazebrook's Report on Optical Theories, 158 Glovv^ lamps, 310, 361 electric, distribution of luminous rays, 321 electric efficiency of, 351 test chart of twenty-four, 352 new kinds of, 354 Glow-worm light will pass through aluminium, 278 Glow-worms, luminescence of, 176, 178, 311, 337 Goethe, his theory of colours, 76 Goldstein, Dr. Eugen, on rays behind the kathode, 280 Granite, in polarised light, 134 Grating, diffraction produced by, 31 Green cannot be made by mixing pure yellow and blue, 89 Haidinger's brushes, iii footjiote Hartnack's modification of Nicol's prism, 121 Hauksbee, Francis, on electric luminosity, 245, 246 Heat-indicating point, 206 waves reflected to focus, 206 shadows, 209 spectrum, 162, 197 Heating effect of waves, 162 by absorption of waves, 201 Heaviside, Oliver, on propagation of energy, 233 Hefner's standard lamp, 20, 314 footnote Helium, 301, 327 Helmholtz, Hermann von, on anomalous refraction, 102 on electromagnetic theory, 234 Herschel, Sir J. W. F. , on plane of polarisation, 158 Sir William, on heat spectrum, 200 Hertz, Professor Heinrich, on dis- electrification, 181 discovery of electric waves, 214 on oscillatory sparks, 214 his oscillators, 215, 221 on reflexion of waves, 217, 220 effect of his discoveries, 234 waves, model illustrating pro- pagation of, 237 on transparency of metal films to kathode rays, 258 Hittorf, Professor W. , on kathode phenomena, 252 Hopkinson, Professor John, on optical and electric proper- ties, 233 Horn, optical properties of, 150 Home's luminescent stuff, 178 Huygens's principle of wave pro- pagation, 9 construction, 69 Hydraulic compressor, automatic, 350 Hyperfluorescence, 285 Ice, apparent radiation of cold by, 205 optical and dielectric properties of, 233 376 LIGHT Iceland spar, 120, 129, 174, 198 Illumination of a surface, 15 Image of a luminous point, 22 in mirror, position of, 23 Images, formation of, 28 inverted, 30 in eye are inverted, 45, 47 Incandescence, the process of, 210, 306 solid particles in, 307 by electricity, 309 Incandescent gas-lights, 345 high-pressure, 348 Incandescent solids and vapours, spectra of, 326 Infra-red waves, 192 Interference of waves, 10 of light produces colours, 141 Internal reflexion, 39 Inverse squares, law of, 16 Invisible, the photography of the, 168 Invisible spectrum, ultra-violet part, 160 infra-red part, 192 Iodine vapour, anomalous refrac- tion of, 100 Irrationahty of dispersion, 78 Isokathodic rays, 280 Ives's method of registering colour by photography, 185 photochromoscope, 187 Jackson, Professor Herbert, his focus tube, 266 Japanese mirrors, 50 Jelly, vibrations transmitted by. Kaleidoscope, principle of, 33 Karnojitzky on alleged polarisa- tion of Rontgen rays, 261 footnote Kathode irays, 253 focusing of, 256 name ihappropriate, 258 new varieties of, 266, 279 Kathode, phenomena at, 249 shadows, 252, 254 , , magnetic deflexion of, 255. 257 streams, 253, 256 Kathodo-luminescence, 175 Kearton, J. W. , his magic mirrors, 53 Kelvin, Lord, theory of the ether, 234 Kern burners, 347 Kerr, Dr. John, magneto -optic discoveries, 234 Kromskop, 187 Kundt, August, on anomalous re- fraction, loi, 103 Lamp, arc-, images of carbons in, 29 Hefner's standard, 20 monochromatic, 82 Langley, Professor S. P. , on longest waves, 190, 197 his bolometer, 197 his curves for one unit of heat, 335 on the production of light without heat, 337 Law of Fechner, 1^ footnote of inverse squares, 16 Le Roux on anomalous dispersion, 100 Lenard, Professor Philipp, his researches, 258 diselectrifying effect of kathode rays, 259 Length of wave : see wave-length Lens, crystalline, principle of, 36, 40 of eye, 44 Lens, cylindrical, 49 measurer, 59 Light, velocity of, 2, 33, 129, 156 emission of, 332 manufacture of, 302-569 primitive sources of, 302 cold lights, 311 INDEX 377 Light, two different Ways of manufacturing, 312 bad economy of ordinary sources , 336 cost of, 362 cheapest form of, 366 future progress, 367 Lights, measurement of, 315 inequaUty of distribution, 317 inequality of composition, 323 relative composition of, 330 Limelight, 309 Lippmann, Professor Gabriel, on photography in colour, 184 Lodge, Professor Oliver Joseph, his oscillators, 222 his detector, 223 his apparatus for optical study of electric waves, 224 illustrations of Maxwell's theory, 234 on electric oscillations, 235 London, University of, contrasted with that of Wlirzburg, 262 Longest waves of infra-red, 190 Lumiere, the Brothers, their pro- cess of colour-photography, iS^ footnote Luminescence, 174, 311 of radium compounds, 298 Luminescent screen in ultra-violet light, 172, 241 used by Rontgen, 239, 241 best kind of, 268 Luminous efficiency, 312 Luminous paint, 177, 311 Lummer, Prof. Otto, his photo- meter, 0.0 footnote on the energy spectra of black body and of platinum, 342 Lyo-luminescence, 175 MacCullagh's theory of light, .157 views as to direction of vibra- tions, 233 Magenta, absorption spectrum of, 87. 104 Magenta, anomalous refraction of, 100, 104 Magnetite arc-lamp, 359, 361 Magneto -optic discoveries, 230, 234 Manufacture of light : see Light Maxwell, Professor James Clerk, on colour- vision, 183 predicted electric waves, 214 electromagnetic theory of light.. 229 on Faraday's electromagnetic theory, 231 Meldola, Professor, on the light of the glow-worm, 337 Mendenhall, C. E. , on luminous efficiency, ■^i'^^ footnote Mercurial air-pump, 247, 251 phosphorus, 246 Mica, optical properties 01, 137, 146 Michelson, Professor, on number of waves in train, wo. footnote Millennium light, 349 distribution of luminous rsiys, 321 Miller's limit of shortest waves, 191 Mirage, experiment illustrating, 48 Mirror, magic, reflexion of lij ht by, 21 of Japan, 50 English, 53 Mirrors, concave and convex, 24 paraboloidal, for reflecting heat- waves, 206 parabolic, used by Hertz, 220 Model illustrating Stokes's theory of Rontgen rays, 275 illustrating propagation of Hertz- wave, 237 Models of wave-motions, 8, 109, 115, 124, 130, 236 Molecular bombardment, 253 Monochromatic lamp, 82 Monoyer on definition of dioptric, 59 Morton, President Henry, his fluorescent dyes, 171 378 LIGHT Mother-of-pearl, colours of, 79 Moving pictures, 97 Muraoka, Dr., on fire-fly light, 278 Muybridge, on movements of animals, 97 Nernst lamp, 354, 361 distribution of luminous rays, 321 New kinds of kathode rays, 279 Newton's colour-whirler, 84 theory of nature of white light, n, 83, 86, 323 tints, 137 rings, 138 table of, 140 explanation of, 142 Nichols, Edward Fox, on anomal- ous refraction, 104 and Rubens's longest waves, 190 Nicol, William, his polarising prism, 121 prism, modern varieties of, 121 Nodal points in reflected waves, 217 Opacity and electric conductivity, relation between, 232, 234 of electric conductors, 232 Opacity of glass to invisible hght, 166, 174, 198, 271 of metals to Rontgen rays, 243 Optical circle, for demonstrating refraction, 38 illusions, 92, 94, 96, 99 rotator, zt.-^ footnote Orders of Newton's tints, 139 Ordinary and extraordinary waves, 125 Orthochromatic photography, 183 Oscillating sparks, 214, 218 Oscillator, Hertz's, 215, 221 Osmium lamp, 354, 355, 361 Osram lamp, 356 Paint, luminous, 177, 178, 311 heat-indicating, 208 Parabolic mirrors. Hertz's, 220 Paraboloidal mirrors for reflecting heat, 206 Paraffin oil, fluorescence of, 169 lamp, unequal distribution of flame, 318 Parakathodic rays, 279 Paschen's longest waves, 190 Pentadecylparatolylketone, 241 footnote Permanganate of potash, absorp- tion by, 88 Perrin, Jean, on refraction of Rontgen rays, 2.6x footnote Persistence of vision, 93, 97 Petroleum, fluorescence of, 169 Phase, difference of, 136 Phenakite, kathodo-luminescence of, 254 Phosphorescence, 175, 311 Phosphorus, luminescence of, 176 Canton's artificial, 177 the mercurial, 246 nature of rays emitted by, 278 Photochemical effects of light, 163, 166 Photochromoscope, 187 Photo-electric effects of Hght, 181, 182, 268 Photographic waves, 162, 182 spectrum, 166 registration of Rontgen shadows, 245 Photography of the invisible, 168 in natural colours, 183, 184 the " new," 245 Photo-luminescence, 175, 176 Photometer, 14, 315 Thompson and Starling's, 18 Trotter's, 18 Brodhun and Lummer's, 19-20 footnote, '^ic^ footnote Bunsen's, ig footnote Joly's, 19 Rood's, -J,! c^ footnote Simmance-Abady's, 315 INDEX 379 Photometry, 313 Pigments darken the light, 83 Pink not a spectrum colour, 87 Pitchblende, 288-290 Plane- waves, 7 Platinocyanides, their optical pro- perties, 172, 281 Polarisation, 105 plane of, 158 of electric waves, 225, 227 of Rontgen rays, attempts at, 261 Polariscope, simple, 153 Polarisers, different kinds of, 113 Polonium, 289 Positive curvature, definition of, 59 lens, definition of, 59 Poynting, Professor J. H. , on ripple-tanks, 6 on energy paths, 233 Primary colour sensations, 86, 89, 91, 183 tints, 86, 91 Prism, refracting, 74 direct-vision, 80 Foucault's, 121 Hartnack's, 121 Nicol's, 121 double-image, 125 Prismatic spectrum, 74 irrationality of, 78 Propagation of waves, 9 of light in glass, 35 of waves longitudinally, 106 of waves transversely, 107, 237 Purple not a spectrum colour, 87 analysis of, 87 Quarter- wave plate, 148 use of, 12.2, footnote, 148 Quartz, anomalous dispersion of, 104 rotatory optical properties of, 154 transparency of, to ultra-violet light, 164 Quartz lenses and prisms, use of, 164, 170, 174 tribo-luminescence of, 181 transparency of, to heat-waves, 198 Quinine, fluorescent property of, 169, 171, 172 Radiant heat, 193, 299 matter, 253, 258 Radiation, t^O) faotjiote from radium, 291, 298 temperature and quality of, 339 wave-length of the dominant, 340 _ Radio-activity, electroscope suit- able for observation of, 286 Radiometer, Crookes's, 199, 213, Radio-micrometer, 334 Radium, discovery of, 289 its cost, 290, 369 power to ionise the air, 291 experiments with, 292 deflexion of the rays, 293 the alpha, beta, and gamma rays, 294-298 continually evolves heat, 299 disintegration of the radium atom, 300 Radium clock, Hon. R. J. Strutt's, 297 lamp, 368 salt, temperature of, 299 Rainbow due to refraction, 73 artificial, 79, 80 Ray-filters for infra-red light, 213 for ultra-violet light, 164 Rayleigh, Lord, on shadows of sounds, 5 on anomalous refraction, loi Theory of Sound, 107 on electromagnetic theory of light, 233 on blue of the sky, 233 on double-refraction, 233 Rays, non-existence of, 12 foot- note 38o LIGHT Rays, kathode, use of term, 257 uranium, 278, 284 radium, 292 Real focus, 26 Reflexion by plane mirror, 21 by convex mirror, 24 by concave mirror, 26, 27 irregular or diffuse, 30 by multiple mirrors, 33 of heat-waves, 206, 209 alleged, of Rontgen rays, 260 Refraction of light, 35 anomalous, 100 double, 120 feeble, of Rontgen rays, 261 Resolution of vibrations, 126 Resonator, Hertz's, 216 Retina of the eye, 45 fatigue of, 93, 96, 99 Reversibility, the principle of, 282 Righi, Professor Augusto, his os- cillators, 221 his apparatus for optical study of electric waves, 225 Ripples, on water, 6 convergence and divergence of, 12 Ripple-tank, 6 Rock-salt lenses and prisms, use of, 194 transparency to ultra-violet light, 166 transparency to infra-red light, 198 Rontgen, Professor Wilhelm Kon- rad, 262 account of his discovery, 238 his form of tube, 260 his theory of the rays, 273 Rontgen rays, properties of, 240 penetrative power of, 243, 292 not deflected by magnet, 260, 292 are not kathode rays, 260 are not ordinary ultra-violet light, 260 are not reflected, 260 point of origin of, 264 Rontgen rays, curious lateral emission of, 265 shadows of bones made by, 269 speculations as to nature of, 273 compared with Becquerel rays, 292 Rosaniline, absorption spectrum of, 87, 104 anomalous refraction of, 100, 104 Rotation of polarised light by quartz and sugar, 154 in magnetic field, 230, 234 by reflexion at magnet pole, 234 Rotator, optical, yq.-^ footnote Rowland's ruling machine, 77 Rubens, Professor, on the emis- sivity of solid particles, 345 on the emissive power of the Welsbach mantle, 347 Rubens's and Nichol's longest waves, 190 Rubies, real and sham, 133 glow in kathode stream, 254 transparency of, to Rontgen rays, 272 luminescence of, 367 Rumford, Count, on radiation of heat, 206 Rupert's drops, optical properties of, xt^x footnote Rutherford, Professor, on the disintegration of the radium atom, 300 Salicine, optical properties of, 135 Schumann'slimit of shortest waves, 191 Scott-Snell burner, 350 Selenite, crystal films of, 133, 136, 145, 148 Sensitiveness of eye, 14 Shadows, light penetrates into, 4, 12 of sounds, 4 of heat, 209 cast by Rontgen rays, 242 kathodic, in Crookes's tubes, 255 INDEX 381 191 Shortest waves in ultra-violet, Silk, shot, reflexion by, 31 Smithells, Professor, on tempera- tures in gas flame, 308 Smoothness, optical definition of, 21 Soap-bubbles, colours of, 138 Sound-waves, size of, 3 frequency of, 106 Spar, calc : see spar, Iceland Spar, Iceland, 120, 129, 174, 198 Spectrimi analysis, vii, 87 of colours, 74 produced by prism, 75, 100 produced by diffraction-grating, 77 visible part of, 161 invisible parts of, 161 the photographic, 166 the long, 173 teaching of the, 325 Speed of light : see Velocity Spherometer, 59 Spinthariscope, Sir William Crookes's, 298 Sprengel's vacuum-pump, 250 Crookes's improvements in, 250 Standard candle, 14, 20, 314 lamp, 20, 2^i\foot7iote Stationary waves, 184, 217 Steinmetz, Dr. C. P. , his magnetite arc-lamp, 359 Stokes, Sir George Gabriel, his discoveries in fluorescence, 169, 172, 283 his theory of Rontgen rays, 273 shortest waves observed by, 191 Strain in imperfectly annealed glass, 151 in compressed glass, 152 Strobic circles, 96 Strutt, Hon. R. J. , on radio-active matter, 291 his radium clock, 297 Subjective colours, 92 Sugar, luminescence of, 180 rotatory properties of, 155 Supplementary tints, 149 Talbot on anomalous refraction, 100 Tantalum lamp, 354, 355, 361 Temperature in relation to emis- sion of light, 174, 211 Thaumatrope, 94 Thermo-luminescence, 175, 180 Thermometer, to explore infra-red spectrum, 193, 200 air, experiment with, 202 Thermopile, use of, 194, 196, 203, 207, 212, 334 Thomson, Professor Joseph John, on ratio of units, 233 Thorium salts, radio-active proper- ties of, 291 Three-colour method of photo- graphy, 183 Tints of spectrum, 72 complementary, 91, 93, in, 136, 149, 188 Newton's, 137, 142 supplementary, 149 Total internal reflexion, 39 Tourmaline, optical properties of, 119, 120 opacity and conductivity of, 234 Trains of waves, 112, 219, 222, 273 Transition-tintj 139 Transparency of flesh, leather, and paper, 243 Transverse waves, 108 Tribo-luminescence, 175, 180 Trichromic theory of colour-vision, 183 Tungsten lamp, 355, 361 Turner, Dr. Dawson, on glow- worm hght, 278 Tyndall, Professor John, his use of colour disks, 92 experiments on reflexion of heat-waves, 209 On Sound, 107 lectures on light, 171 382 LIGHT Tyndall, Professor John, his wave- filter for infra-red, 213 on the spectrum of the arc- lamp, 334 Ultra-violet light, 160, 162 chemical effects of, 167 reflexion, etc., of, 174 light, diselectrification by, 181 Universities of London and Wiirz- burg, 262 Uranium, great density and opacity of, 244 its radio-activity, 299, 301 Uranium glass, fluorescence of, 169 nitrate, tribo-luminescence of, 180 rays, 278, 284, 285 " Uranium X," 301 Vacuum-pump, the mercurial, 247, 251 Vapour lamp, electric, 360, 361 Velocity of light in air, 2, 33 in water, 33 in glass, 33 of heat-waves, 212 of propagation of electric dis- turbances, 232 Velocity-constant, definition of, 60 Vernon Harcourt pentane lamp, 314 Virtual focus, 26, 27 Wave-length, 4, 7, 72 motion models, 8, 124, 236 front, motion of, 9 tables of, 72, 190 filters for infra-red waves, 213 Wave-length of electric waves, 214 Wave-lengths of different sources of radiation, 340, 342 Wave-theory of hght, 230 Waves, travelling of, 7, 106, 237 propagation of, 9, 106, 156, 157. 233 Waves, trains of, 112, 219, 222, 273 Weber, Professor Wilhelm, on ratio of electric units, 232 Webster, Rt. Hon. Sir Richard, his hand, 270 Wedding, Professor W. , on luminous efficiency, -^i-^ foot- note, 336 his comparison of sources of light, 362, 364 Welsbach mantle, 342, 345 its emissive power, 347 distribution of luminous rays, 319. 320 Wheatstone, Sir Charles, on velocity of electric disturb- ances, 232 Wheel of life, 97 White light, analysed, 79, 149 synthesis of, 83, 84, 90 Whiteness, no standard of, known, 211 foot7iote Wiedemann, Professor Eilhard, on luminescence, 174, 180 foot- note his "discharge-rays," 276, 278 Willemite, 298 luminescence of, 367 Winkelmann, Professor A., on re- fraction of Rontgen rays, 261 footnote Wiirzburg, University of, 262 X-luminescence, 175, 260 X-rays : see Rontgen rays Yellow not a primary colour- sensation, 89 Young, Dr. Thomas, on colour- sensation, 183 Young, Professor, on the light of the American fire-fly, 337 Zoetrope, 97 Printed hi Great Britain by R. & R. Ci.akk', Ltmiikd, Edinburgh. OTHER WORKS BY Prof. SILVANUS P. THOMPSON LIFE OF WILLIAM THOMSON, BARON KELVIN OF LARGS. Illustrated. Two vols. 8vo. 30s. net. ELEMENTARY LESSONS IN ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM. New Edition, completely revised (191 5). Fcap. 8vo. 5s. 6d. THE MANUFACTURE OF LIGHT. Crown 8vo. IS. 3d. net. CONTRIBUTIONS TO PHOTOGRAPHIC OPTICS. By Otto Lummer. Translated and augmented by Dr. SiLVANUS P. Thompson. 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. TREATISE ON LIGHT. By Christiaan Huygens. Rendered into English by Dr. SiLVANUS P. Thompson. Fcap. 4to. los. net. CALCULUS MADE EASY. Second Edition. Globe 8vo. 3s. MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd., LONDON. WORKS ON PHYSICS. THE THEORY OF LIGHT. By Thomas Preston, F.R.S. Fifth Edition. Edited by Prof. A. W. Porter, D.Sc. 25s. net. TREATISE ON PRACTICAL LIGHT. By R. S. Clay, D.Sc. 12s. 6d. net. PRACTICAL EXERCISES IN LIGHT. By R. S. Clay, D.Sc. 3s. LIGHT FOR STUDENTS. By E. Edser, A.R.C.Sc. 78. OPTICS: A Manual for Students. By A. S. Percival, M.A., M.B. 12s. 6d. net. ILLUMINATION : Its Distribution and Measure- ment. By Alexander Pelham Trotter. I OS. 6d. net. PHYSICAL OPTICS. By Robert W. Wood, LL.D. Second Edition. 21s. net. MIRRORS, PRISMS AND LENSES: A Text- book of Geometrical Optics. By Prof. James P. C. SouTHALL. 2 IS. net. RESEARCHES IN MAGNETO-OPTICS. By Prof. P. Zeeman, Sc.D. 7s. 6d. net. X-RAYS AND ELECTRONS. An Outline of Recent X-Ray Theory. By 'Prof. Arthur H. CoMPTON, Ph.D. 25s. net. LENS COMPUTING BY TRIGONOMETRICAL TRACE. By Col. J. W. Gifford, F.R.A.S. With a Foreword by Prof. F. Cheshire, C.B.E. 7s. 6d. net. MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. 2 t WORKS ON PHYSICS. TEXT-BOOK OF PHYSICS. By J. Duncan, Wh.Ex., MT.M.E., and S. G. Starling, B.Sc, A.R.C.Sc. i8s. Also in parts: Dynamics. 6s. Heat, Light and Sound. 7s. 6d. Magnetism and Electricity. 5s. Heat. 4s. 6d. Light and Sound. 4s. 6d. Heat and Light. 6s. A TEXT-BOOK OF PRACTICAL PHYSICS. By Prof. H. S. Allen, M.A., D.Sc, and H. Moore, A.R.C.S., B.Sc. los. 6d. Part I., Properties of Matter. 4s. Parts II., HI., and IV., Sound, Light and Heat. 4s. Parts I. and IV. 5s. Part IV. is. gd. Parts V. and VI., Magnetism and Electricity. 4s. DICTIONARY OF APPLIED PHYSICS. By Various Writers. Edited by Sir Richard Glazebrook, K.C.B., Sc.D., F.R.S. Illustrated. In 5 vols. 8vo. /^3 : 3s. net each. The set of 5 vols. ;{^i4 : 14s. net. Vol. I. Mechanics, Engineering and Heat. Vol. II. Electricity. Vol. HI. Metrology, Meteorology, and Measur- ing Appliances. Vol. IV. Optics, Sound and Radiology. Vol. V. Aeronautics, Metallurgy and General Index. GENERAL PHYSICS FOR STUDENTS. A Text-Book on the Fundamental Properties of Matter. Reprinted with additions. By E. Edser, A.R.C.Sc. 8s. 6d. EVERYDAY PHYSICS. By H. E. Hadley, B.Sc. Complete. 6s. 6d. Section I. 2s. 6d. Sections II.-IV. 2s. 6d. Section V. 2s. 6d. MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. 3 WORKS ON PHYSICS. LECTURES ON THEORETICAL PHYSICS. By Prof. H. A. LoRENTZ, For. Mem. R.S. Trans- lated by Dr. L. Silberstein and A. P. H. Trivelli. Vol. I. Aether Theories and Aether Models. Edited by Dr. H. Bremekamp. Kinetical Problems. Edited by Dr. E. D. Bruins and Dr. J. Reudler. 12s. 6d. net. 'Vol. 11. Thermodynamics. Edited by T. C. Clay-Jolles. Entropy and Probability. Edited by C. A. Crommelin, Ph.D. The Theory of Radiation. Edited by A. D. Fokker, Ph.D. The Theory of Quanta. Edited by G. L. de Haas-Lorentz, Ph.D. 21s. net. PHYSICS FOR COLLEGES. By Profs. H. Horton Sheldon, C. V. Kent, C. W. Miller and R. F. Paton. I 6s. net. INTRODUCTION TO CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS. By. Dr. Karl K. Darrow. 25s. net. A HISTORY OF PHYSICS IN ITS ELEMENT- ARY BRANCHES. By Prof F. Cajori, Ph.D. I OS. 6d. net. THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY. By L. Silberstein, Ph.D. Second Edition. 25s. net. THE ORIGIN, NATURE, AND INFLUENCE OF RELATIVITY. By Prof George D. BiRKHOFF. 8s. 6d. net. MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. 4 BOSTON COLLEGE 3 9031 01530693 9 ^55893 BOSTON COLLEGE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CHESTNUT HILL, MASS. Books may be kept for two weeks and may- be renewed for the same period, unless re- served. Two cents a day is charged for each book kept overtime. If you cannot find what you want, ask the Librarian who will be glad to help you. The borrower is responsible for books drawn on his card and for all fines accruing on the same. ii-iiz !r-,s;sss' tiAim '^WWBBMB^H^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^BB^^ ifB '^flMMffi i t r?Jr!^^Sill^B^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^BP^^^ ' ^^^^^^^^h^^^BHH^HHB^^^^^^^HbH^bb^^^^^^^^b^^^^ Iqi^ igiiifnmji«" • •''•'''•^'TiBBBBBBllll^^^^^^^^^^BBB^BIIlHBIininlMWlilliliB 'f'^f'^T'**' '^"i^^iS^^^ttSttmKsS^tituitS^^^^^^^^^^^ w ■«uc '^'^^^^^^titnRiHmaaHRHnHnHBnaMHHnRna^